道德经验主义

Shaun Nichols
{"title":"道德经验主义","authors":"Shaun Nichols","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198869153.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Is morality prewired into our minds? The idea that morality is built into us is an old one in philosophy, and it has seen a resurgence of late. Indeed, the prevailing systematic account of how we acquire complex moral representations is a nativist view inspired by arguments in Chomskyan linguistics. If the statistical learning accounts I’ve defended in Part II of this book are right, we have the beginnings of an empiricist account of important aspects of human morality. This chapter offers a sustained defense of a moral empiricist view in the face of the Chomskyan challenge.","PeriodicalId":383766,"journal":{"name":"Rational Rules","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moral Empiricism\",\"authors\":\"Shaun Nichols\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198869153.003.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Is morality prewired into our minds? The idea that morality is built into us is an old one in philosophy, and it has seen a resurgence of late. Indeed, the prevailing systematic account of how we acquire complex moral representations is a nativist view inspired by arguments in Chomskyan linguistics. If the statistical learning accounts I’ve defended in Part II of this book are right, we have the beginnings of an empiricist account of important aspects of human morality. This chapter offers a sustained defense of a moral empiricist view in the face of the Chomskyan challenge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rational Rules\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rational Rules\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198869153.003.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rational Rules","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198869153.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

道德是否已经根植于我们的头脑中?道德是与生俱来的这一观点在哲学中是一个古老的观点,最近又出现了复苏。事实上,关于我们如何获得复杂的道德表征的主流系统描述是一种受乔姆斯基语言学论点启发的本土主义观点。如果我在本书第二部分中捍卫的统计学习理论是正确的,那么我们就有了一个关于人类道德重要方面的经验主义解释的开端。面对乔姆斯基的挑战,本章为道德经验主义观点提供了持续的辩护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moral Empiricism
Is morality prewired into our minds? The idea that morality is built into us is an old one in philosophy, and it has seen a resurgence of late. Indeed, the prevailing systematic account of how we acquire complex moral representations is a nativist view inspired by arguments in Chomskyan linguistics. If the statistical learning accounts I’ve defended in Part II of this book are right, we have the beginnings of an empiricist account of important aspects of human morality. This chapter offers a sustained defense of a moral empiricist view in the face of the Chomskyan challenge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信