考虑壁面传热的氢气-空气旋转爆震发动机应力混合涡模拟

H. Elasrag, T. Gallagher, B. Rankin, S. Schumaker
{"title":"考虑壁面传热的氢气-空气旋转爆震发动机应力混合涡模拟","authors":"H. Elasrag, T. Gallagher, B. Rankin, S. Schumaker","doi":"10.1115/gt2022-81152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hybrid stress blended eddy simulations (SBESs) are performed for the AFRL rotating detonation engine burner with detailed finite rate chemistry. The near wall boundary layer flow is modeled using URANS k-ω-SST model and the turbulent internal flow is modeled using Large Eddy Simulation (LES) dynamic Smagorinsky model. Using one-dimensional (1D) detonation tubes, the chemical mechanism and the chemistry integration algorithm are validated against the Chapman Jouguet (CJ) conditions and the Zel’dovich-von Neumann-DÖring (ZND) calculations with reasonably good accuracy. The impact of spatial and temporal resolutions on the wave propagation speed (WPS) and the von Neumann (VN) peak is studied using 1D detonation tube simulations. Using second order (SO) spatial accuracy, the SO temporal scheme over-predicts the VN peak with numerical dispersion near the pressure’s peak, while the first order (FO) temporal scheme is found to add the correct numerical dissipation. The SO and FO profiles show identical wave structure at different resolutions in the expansion region downstream of the compression shock’s peak. With FO temporal scheme, the VN peak was found to vary within 2%–6% band within a spatial resolution range of 0.5–0.001 mm and within 2%–20% band within a temporal resolution range of 1E−7 s – 1E−8 s. The spatial and temporal resolutions, however, are found to have a smaller impact on the WPS (varies within 2%–5%). For three-dimensional (3D) simulations the SO and FO comparisons with data were overall comparable. The results show very good agreement with the measurements mean static pressure data, WPS, specific thrust and specific impulse. The SO temporal scheme predicted a WPS with a mean error of approximately 11%–10% while the FO temporal scheme mean error is 6%. Back-flow due to the detonation wave in the air and fuel plenums are quantified to be 10% and 15%, respectively. The impact of wall heat transfer modeling on the detonation wave is studied. As the wall temperature increases more deflagration burning in the refill zone occurs ahead of the detonation wave. The fraction of heat released by deflagration and detonation is quantified for each case using cut-off values of 5 atm and 10 atm. Although the impact of wall heat transfer on WPS is found to be small, the fraction of heat released by deflagration increased by 10% for 600 K isothermal wall temperature compared to the 300 K isothermal wall temperature. For local static temperatures > 300 K, the fraction of heat released in the deflagration mode was 75%, 53%, and 40%, for the adiabatic walls, 600 K, and 300 K isothermal walls, respectively. The current numerical study shows that accurate wall heat transfer modeling is important for rotating detonation engine (RDE) numerical simulations.","PeriodicalId":121836,"journal":{"name":"Volume 3A: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stress Blended Eddy Simulations for Hydrogen-Air Rotating Detonation Engine With Wall Heat Transfer\",\"authors\":\"H. Elasrag, T. Gallagher, B. Rankin, S. Schumaker\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/gt2022-81152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hybrid stress blended eddy simulations (SBESs) are performed for the AFRL rotating detonation engine burner with detailed finite rate chemistry. The near wall boundary layer flow is modeled using URANS k-ω-SST model and the turbulent internal flow is modeled using Large Eddy Simulation (LES) dynamic Smagorinsky model. Using one-dimensional (1D) detonation tubes, the chemical mechanism and the chemistry integration algorithm are validated against the Chapman Jouguet (CJ) conditions and the Zel’dovich-von Neumann-DÖring (ZND) calculations with reasonably good accuracy. The impact of spatial and temporal resolutions on the wave propagation speed (WPS) and the von Neumann (VN) peak is studied using 1D detonation tube simulations. Using second order (SO) spatial accuracy, the SO temporal scheme over-predicts the VN peak with numerical dispersion near the pressure’s peak, while the first order (FO) temporal scheme is found to add the correct numerical dissipation. The SO and FO profiles show identical wave structure at different resolutions in the expansion region downstream of the compression shock’s peak. With FO temporal scheme, the VN peak was found to vary within 2%–6% band within a spatial resolution range of 0.5–0.001 mm and within 2%–20% band within a temporal resolution range of 1E−7 s – 1E−8 s. The spatial and temporal resolutions, however, are found to have a smaller impact on the WPS (varies within 2%–5%). For three-dimensional (3D) simulations the SO and FO comparisons with data were overall comparable. The results show very good agreement with the measurements mean static pressure data, WPS, specific thrust and specific impulse. The SO temporal scheme predicted a WPS with a mean error of approximately 11%–10% while the FO temporal scheme mean error is 6%. Back-flow due to the detonation wave in the air and fuel plenums are quantified to be 10% and 15%, respectively. The impact of wall heat transfer modeling on the detonation wave is studied. As the wall temperature increases more deflagration burning in the refill zone occurs ahead of the detonation wave. The fraction of heat released by deflagration and detonation is quantified for each case using cut-off values of 5 atm and 10 atm. Although the impact of wall heat transfer on WPS is found to be small, the fraction of heat released by deflagration increased by 10% for 600 K isothermal wall temperature compared to the 300 K isothermal wall temperature. For local static temperatures > 300 K, the fraction of heat released in the deflagration mode was 75%, 53%, and 40%, for the adiabatic walls, 600 K, and 300 K isothermal walls, respectively. The current numerical study shows that accurate wall heat transfer modeling is important for rotating detonation engine (RDE) numerical simulations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":121836,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 3A: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 3A: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2022-81152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 3A: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2022-81152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对AFRL旋转爆震发动机燃烧器进行了混合应力混合涡模拟(sess),并进行了详细的有限速率化学模拟。近壁面边界层流动采用URANS k-ω-SST模型,湍流内部流动采用大涡模拟(LES)动态Smagorinsky模型。利用一维(1D)爆轰管,针对Chapman Jouguet (CJ)条件和Zel ' ovich-von Neumann-DÖring (ZND)计算验证了化学机理和化学积分算法,并获得了相当好的精度。利用一维爆轰管模拟研究了时空分辨率对波传播速度(WPS)和冯诺依曼峰(VN)的影响。利用二阶(SO)空间精度,发现SO时间格式在压力峰值附近过度预测了VN峰值,而一阶(FO)时间格式增加了正确的数值耗散。在压缩激波峰值下游的膨胀区,SO和FO剖面在不同分辨率下显示出相同的波结构。在FO时间方案下,在0.5 ~ 0.001 mm的空间分辨率范围内,VN峰在2% ~ 6%的频带内变化;在1E−7 s ~ 1E−8 s的时间分辨率范围内,VN峰在2% ~ 20%的频带内变化。然而,空间和时间分辨率对WPS的影响较小(变化在2%-5%之间)。对于三维(3D)模拟,SO和FO与数据的比较总体上具有可比性。计算结果与实测的平均静压、WPS、比推力和比冲数据吻合较好。SO时间方案预测WPS的平均误差约为11% ~ 10%,而FO时间方案预测WPS的平均误差为6%。爆震波在空气和燃料中引起的回流分别量化为10%和15%。研究了壁面传热模型对爆震波的影响。随着壁面温度的升高,再燃区爆燃在爆震波前发生较多。使用5 atm和10 atm的临界值对每种情况下爆燃和爆轰释放的热量比例进行量化。虽然壁面换热对WPS的影响较小,但与300 K等温壁面温度相比,600 K等温壁面温度下爆燃释放的热量增加了10%。当局部静态温度为> ~ 300k时,绝热壁面、600k等温壁面和300k等温壁面爆燃模式释放的热量分别为75%、53%和40%。目前的数值研究表明,精确的壁面传热建模对于旋转爆震发动机的数值模拟具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stress Blended Eddy Simulations for Hydrogen-Air Rotating Detonation Engine With Wall Heat Transfer
Hybrid stress blended eddy simulations (SBESs) are performed for the AFRL rotating detonation engine burner with detailed finite rate chemistry. The near wall boundary layer flow is modeled using URANS k-ω-SST model and the turbulent internal flow is modeled using Large Eddy Simulation (LES) dynamic Smagorinsky model. Using one-dimensional (1D) detonation tubes, the chemical mechanism and the chemistry integration algorithm are validated against the Chapman Jouguet (CJ) conditions and the Zel’dovich-von Neumann-DÖring (ZND) calculations with reasonably good accuracy. The impact of spatial and temporal resolutions on the wave propagation speed (WPS) and the von Neumann (VN) peak is studied using 1D detonation tube simulations. Using second order (SO) spatial accuracy, the SO temporal scheme over-predicts the VN peak with numerical dispersion near the pressure’s peak, while the first order (FO) temporal scheme is found to add the correct numerical dissipation. The SO and FO profiles show identical wave structure at different resolutions in the expansion region downstream of the compression shock’s peak. With FO temporal scheme, the VN peak was found to vary within 2%–6% band within a spatial resolution range of 0.5–0.001 mm and within 2%–20% band within a temporal resolution range of 1E−7 s – 1E−8 s. The spatial and temporal resolutions, however, are found to have a smaller impact on the WPS (varies within 2%–5%). For three-dimensional (3D) simulations the SO and FO comparisons with data were overall comparable. The results show very good agreement with the measurements mean static pressure data, WPS, specific thrust and specific impulse. The SO temporal scheme predicted a WPS with a mean error of approximately 11%–10% while the FO temporal scheme mean error is 6%. Back-flow due to the detonation wave in the air and fuel plenums are quantified to be 10% and 15%, respectively. The impact of wall heat transfer modeling on the detonation wave is studied. As the wall temperature increases more deflagration burning in the refill zone occurs ahead of the detonation wave. The fraction of heat released by deflagration and detonation is quantified for each case using cut-off values of 5 atm and 10 atm. Although the impact of wall heat transfer on WPS is found to be small, the fraction of heat released by deflagration increased by 10% for 600 K isothermal wall temperature compared to the 300 K isothermal wall temperature. For local static temperatures > 300 K, the fraction of heat released in the deflagration mode was 75%, 53%, and 40%, for the adiabatic walls, 600 K, and 300 K isothermal walls, respectively. The current numerical study shows that accurate wall heat transfer modeling is important for rotating detonation engine (RDE) numerical simulations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信