埃塞俄比亚提格雷Tanqua Abergelle地区沟灌系统对胡椒(MelkaShota)生产的效果评价

E. Tariku, G/ Kiros Gebremedihin
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚提格雷Tanqua Abergelle地区沟灌系统对胡椒(MelkaShota)生产的效果评价","authors":"E. Tariku, G/ Kiros Gebremedihin","doi":"10.59122/134110c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The field experiment was conducted in north Ethiopia, Tigray at sub-district called Sheka-tekli. The objective of the study was to evaluate the performance of furrow irrigation systems on pepper production. The furrow irrigation treatments were i) Conventional Furrow (CF), ii) Alternate Furrow (AF), and iii) Fixed Furrow (FF). The experimental design was a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. The climatic data were obtained from Ethiopian Meteorological Agency and New_LocClim software. The crop water requirement and irrigation scheduling were estimated using Cropwat8 software. The collected agronomic data were subjected to one way ANOVA while irrigation water related performances indicators were computed using equations. Accordingly, the fresh pepper yield for CF (12250 kg h-1) and AF (9670 kg h-1) were not significant different. However, there was significant difference between CF and FF methods of furrow irrigation. The fresh crop yield for FF was 7670 kg h-1. The water savings from AF and FF methods of irrigation as compared to the CF method was 30.62%.The economic irrigation water productivity was higher in AF (5.33 ETB m-3) than CF (4.68 ETB m-3) and FF (0.49 ETB m-3). Irrigation water productivity was 1.95 kg m-3, 2.22 kg m-3 and 1.76 kg m-3 for CF, and AF and FF methods of irrigation, respectively. Thus economic irrigation water productivity and environmental benefits foralternate furrow irrigation method (AF) was much superior as compared to other furrow irrigation methods.","PeriodicalId":156282,"journal":{"name":"Ethiopian Journal of Water Science and Technology","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation of furrow irrigation system on pepper (MelkaShota) production at Tanqua Abergelle district, Tigray, Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"E. Tariku, G/ Kiros Gebremedihin\",\"doi\":\"10.59122/134110c\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The field experiment was conducted in north Ethiopia, Tigray at sub-district called Sheka-tekli. The objective of the study was to evaluate the performance of furrow irrigation systems on pepper production. The furrow irrigation treatments were i) Conventional Furrow (CF), ii) Alternate Furrow (AF), and iii) Fixed Furrow (FF). The experimental design was a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. The climatic data were obtained from Ethiopian Meteorological Agency and New_LocClim software. The crop water requirement and irrigation scheduling were estimated using Cropwat8 software. The collected agronomic data were subjected to one way ANOVA while irrigation water related performances indicators were computed using equations. Accordingly, the fresh pepper yield for CF (12250 kg h-1) and AF (9670 kg h-1) were not significant different. However, there was significant difference between CF and FF methods of furrow irrigation. The fresh crop yield for FF was 7670 kg h-1. The water savings from AF and FF methods of irrigation as compared to the CF method was 30.62%.The economic irrigation water productivity was higher in AF (5.33 ETB m-3) than CF (4.68 ETB m-3) and FF (0.49 ETB m-3). Irrigation water productivity was 1.95 kg m-3, 2.22 kg m-3 and 1.76 kg m-3 for CF, and AF and FF methods of irrigation, respectively. Thus economic irrigation water productivity and environmental benefits foralternate furrow irrigation method (AF) was much superior as compared to other furrow irrigation methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":156282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethiopian Journal of Water Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethiopian Journal of Water Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59122/134110c\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethiopian Journal of Water Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59122/134110c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

田间试验在埃塞俄比亚北部提格雷的Sheka-tekli分区进行。本研究的目的是评价沟灌系统对辣椒生产的影响。沟灌处理为常规沟灌(CF)、交替沟灌(AF)和固定沟灌(FF)。试验设计为随机完全区组设计(RCBD), 3个重复。气候数据来自埃塞俄比亚气象局和New_LocClim软件。利用Cropwat8软件估算作物需水量和灌溉调度。收集的农艺数据进行单因素方差分析,灌溉水相关性能指标使用方程计算。因此,CF (12250 kg h-1)和AF (9670 kg h-1)的鲜椒产量差异不显著。但CF和FF两种垄灌方式间差异显著。FF鲜产量为7670 kg h-1。与CF法相比,AF法和FF法节水30.62%。旱地灌溉水经济生产力(5.33 ETB m-3)高于旱地(4.68 ETB m-3)和旱地(0.49 ETB m-3)。CF、AF和FF灌溉方式的灌溉水分生产力分别为1.95 kg m-3、2.22 kg m-3和1.76 kg m-3。因此,交替沟灌方式的经济灌溉效率和环境效益远优于其他沟灌方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance evaluation of furrow irrigation system on pepper (MelkaShota) production at Tanqua Abergelle district, Tigray, Ethiopia
The field experiment was conducted in north Ethiopia, Tigray at sub-district called Sheka-tekli. The objective of the study was to evaluate the performance of furrow irrigation systems on pepper production. The furrow irrigation treatments were i) Conventional Furrow (CF), ii) Alternate Furrow (AF), and iii) Fixed Furrow (FF). The experimental design was a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. The climatic data were obtained from Ethiopian Meteorological Agency and New_LocClim software. The crop water requirement and irrigation scheduling were estimated using Cropwat8 software. The collected agronomic data were subjected to one way ANOVA while irrigation water related performances indicators were computed using equations. Accordingly, the fresh pepper yield for CF (12250 kg h-1) and AF (9670 kg h-1) were not significant different. However, there was significant difference between CF and FF methods of furrow irrigation. The fresh crop yield for FF was 7670 kg h-1. The water savings from AF and FF methods of irrigation as compared to the CF method was 30.62%.The economic irrigation water productivity was higher in AF (5.33 ETB m-3) than CF (4.68 ETB m-3) and FF (0.49 ETB m-3). Irrigation water productivity was 1.95 kg m-3, 2.22 kg m-3 and 1.76 kg m-3 for CF, and AF and FF methods of irrigation, respectively. Thus economic irrigation water productivity and environmental benefits foralternate furrow irrigation method (AF) was much superior as compared to other furrow irrigation methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信