当电力超额认购遭遇流量洪水攻击:对数据中心峰值负荷管理的重新思考

Xiaofeng Hou, Mingyu Liang, Chao Li, Wenli Zheng, Quan Chen, M. Guo
{"title":"当电力超额认购遭遇流量洪水攻击:对数据中心峰值负荷管理的重新思考","authors":"Xiaofeng Hou, Mingyu Liang, Chao Li, Wenli Zheng, Quan Chen, M. Guo","doi":"10.1145/3337821.3337856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The state-of-the-art techniques on data center peak power management are too optimistic; they overestimate their benefits in a potentially insecure operating environment. Especially in data centers that oversubscribe power infrastructure, it is likely that unexpected traffics can violate power budget before an effective network DoS attack is observed. In this work, we take the first to investigate the joint effect of power throttling and traffic flooding. We characterize a special operating region in which DoS attacks can provoke undesirable power peaks without exhibiting network traffic anomalies. In this region, an attacker can trigger power emergency by sending normal traffics throughout the Internet. We term this new type of threat as DOPE (Denial of Power and Energy). We show that existing technologies are insufficient for eliminating DOPE without negative performance effects on legitimate users. To enhance data center resiliency, we propose a request-aware power management framework called Anti-DOPE. The key feature of Anti-DOPE is bridging the gap between network traffic controlling and server power management. Specifically, it pre-processes of incoming requests to isolate malicious power attacks on the network load balancer side and then post-processes of compute node performance to minimize the collateral damage it may cause. Anti-DOPE is orthogonal to prior power management schemes and requires minute system modification. Using Alibaba container trace we show that Anti-DOPE allows 44% shorter average response time. It also improves the 90th percentile tail latency by 68.1% compared to the other power controlling methods.","PeriodicalId":405273,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 48th International Conference on Parallel Processing","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When Power Oversubscription Meets Traffic Flood Attack: Re-Thinking Data Center Peak Load Management\",\"authors\":\"Xiaofeng Hou, Mingyu Liang, Chao Li, Wenli Zheng, Quan Chen, M. Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3337821.3337856\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The state-of-the-art techniques on data center peak power management are too optimistic; they overestimate their benefits in a potentially insecure operating environment. Especially in data centers that oversubscribe power infrastructure, it is likely that unexpected traffics can violate power budget before an effective network DoS attack is observed. In this work, we take the first to investigate the joint effect of power throttling and traffic flooding. We characterize a special operating region in which DoS attacks can provoke undesirable power peaks without exhibiting network traffic anomalies. In this region, an attacker can trigger power emergency by sending normal traffics throughout the Internet. We term this new type of threat as DOPE (Denial of Power and Energy). We show that existing technologies are insufficient for eliminating DOPE without negative performance effects on legitimate users. To enhance data center resiliency, we propose a request-aware power management framework called Anti-DOPE. The key feature of Anti-DOPE is bridging the gap between network traffic controlling and server power management. Specifically, it pre-processes of incoming requests to isolate malicious power attacks on the network load balancer side and then post-processes of compute node performance to minimize the collateral damage it may cause. Anti-DOPE is orthogonal to prior power management schemes and requires minute system modification. Using Alibaba container trace we show that Anti-DOPE allows 44% shorter average response time. It also improves the 90th percentile tail latency by 68.1% compared to the other power controlling methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":405273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 48th International Conference on Parallel Processing\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 48th International Conference on Parallel Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3337821.3337856\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 48th International Conference on Parallel Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3337821.3337856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

数据中心峰值电源管理的最新技术过于乐观;他们高估了自己在潜在不安全的操作环境中的利益。特别是在过度订阅电力基础设施的数据中心中,在观察到有效的网络DoS攻击之前,意外流量可能会违反电力预算。在这项工作中,我们首先研究了功率节流和交通泛滥的联合效应。我们描述了一个特殊的操作区域,其中DoS攻击可以在不显示网络流量异常的情况下引发不希望的功率峰值。在该区域,攻击者可以通过在Internet上发送正常流量来触发电源紧急情况。我们把这种新型的威胁称为DOPE(拒绝权力和能量)。我们表明,现有技术不足以在不对合法用户产生负面性能影响的情况下消除DOPE。为了增强数据中心的弹性,我们提出了一个名为Anti-DOPE的请求感知电源管理框架。Anti-DOPE的主要特点是在网络流量控制和服务器电源管理之间架起了桥梁。具体来说,它对传入请求进行预处理,以隔离网络负载均衡器侧的恶意电源攻击,然后对计算节点的性能进行后处理,以尽量减少可能造成的附带损害。Anti-DOPE与先前的电源管理方案正交,需要对系统进行微小的修改。使用阿里巴巴的集装箱跟踪,我们发现Anti-DOPE可以缩短44%的平均响应时间。与其他功率控制方法相比,它还将第90百分位尾部延迟提高了68.1%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When Power Oversubscription Meets Traffic Flood Attack: Re-Thinking Data Center Peak Load Management
The state-of-the-art techniques on data center peak power management are too optimistic; they overestimate their benefits in a potentially insecure operating environment. Especially in data centers that oversubscribe power infrastructure, it is likely that unexpected traffics can violate power budget before an effective network DoS attack is observed. In this work, we take the first to investigate the joint effect of power throttling and traffic flooding. We characterize a special operating region in which DoS attacks can provoke undesirable power peaks without exhibiting network traffic anomalies. In this region, an attacker can trigger power emergency by sending normal traffics throughout the Internet. We term this new type of threat as DOPE (Denial of Power and Energy). We show that existing technologies are insufficient for eliminating DOPE without negative performance effects on legitimate users. To enhance data center resiliency, we propose a request-aware power management framework called Anti-DOPE. The key feature of Anti-DOPE is bridging the gap between network traffic controlling and server power management. Specifically, it pre-processes of incoming requests to isolate malicious power attacks on the network load balancer side and then post-processes of compute node performance to minimize the collateral damage it may cause. Anti-DOPE is orthogonal to prior power management schemes and requires minute system modification. Using Alibaba container trace we show that Anti-DOPE allows 44% shorter average response time. It also improves the 90th percentile tail latency by 68.1% compared to the other power controlling methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信