非隐私非公平:数据不平衡对差异隐私中效用与公平的影响

Tom Farrand, FatemehSadat Mireshghallah, Sahib Singh, Andrew Trask
{"title":"非隐私非公平:数据不平衡对差异隐私中效用与公平的影响","authors":"Tom Farrand, FatemehSadat Mireshghallah, Sahib Singh, Andrew Trask","doi":"10.1145/3411501.3419419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deployment of deep learning in different fields and industries is growing day by day due to its performance, which relies on the availability of data and compute. Data is often crowd-sourced and contains sensitive information about its contributors, which leaks into models that are trained on it. To achieve rigorous privacy guarantees, differentially private training mechanisms are used. However, it has recently been shown that differential privacy can exacerbate existing biases in the data and have disparate impacts on the accuracy of different subgroups of data. In this paper, we aim to study these effects within differentially private deep learning. Specifically, we aim to study how different levels of imbalance in the data affect the accuracy and the fairness of the decisions made by the model, given different levels of privacy. We demonstrate that even small imbalances and loose privacy guarantees can cause disparate impacts.","PeriodicalId":116231,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2020 Workshop on Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning in Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"49","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neither Private Nor Fair: Impact of Data Imbalance on Utility and Fairness in Differential Privacy\",\"authors\":\"Tom Farrand, FatemehSadat Mireshghallah, Sahib Singh, Andrew Trask\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3411501.3419419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Deployment of deep learning in different fields and industries is growing day by day due to its performance, which relies on the availability of data and compute. Data is often crowd-sourced and contains sensitive information about its contributors, which leaks into models that are trained on it. To achieve rigorous privacy guarantees, differentially private training mechanisms are used. However, it has recently been shown that differential privacy can exacerbate existing biases in the data and have disparate impacts on the accuracy of different subgroups of data. In this paper, we aim to study these effects within differentially private deep learning. Specifically, we aim to study how different levels of imbalance in the data affect the accuracy and the fairness of the decisions made by the model, given different levels of privacy. We demonstrate that even small imbalances and loose privacy guarantees can cause disparate impacts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":116231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2020 Workshop on Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning in Practice\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"49\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2020 Workshop on Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3411501.3419419\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2020 Workshop on Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3411501.3419419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

摘要

由于其性能依赖于数据和计算的可用性,深度学习在不同领域和行业的部署日益增长。数据通常是众包的,包含有关其贡献者的敏感信息,这些信息会泄露给基于这些信息的训练模型。为了实现严格的隐私保障,使用了不同的私人培训机制。然而,最近的研究表明,不同的隐私会加剧数据中现有的偏见,并对不同子组数据的准确性产生不同的影响。在本文中,我们的目标是在差异私有深度学习中研究这些影响。具体来说,我们的目标是研究在给定不同隐私水平的情况下,数据中不同程度的不平衡如何影响模型所做决策的准确性和公平性。我们证明,即使是很小的不平衡和松散的隐私保证也会导致完全不同的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neither Private Nor Fair: Impact of Data Imbalance on Utility and Fairness in Differential Privacy
Deployment of deep learning in different fields and industries is growing day by day due to its performance, which relies on the availability of data and compute. Data is often crowd-sourced and contains sensitive information about its contributors, which leaks into models that are trained on it. To achieve rigorous privacy guarantees, differentially private training mechanisms are used. However, it has recently been shown that differential privacy can exacerbate existing biases in the data and have disparate impacts on the accuracy of different subgroups of data. In this paper, we aim to study these effects within differentially private deep learning. Specifically, we aim to study how different levels of imbalance in the data affect the accuracy and the fairness of the decisions made by the model, given different levels of privacy. We demonstrate that even small imbalances and loose privacy guarantees can cause disparate impacts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信