E.M.T.S.有限公司诉MTN通信有限公司&另一个:尼日利亚电信行业竞争法的执行是福还是祸?

Wiseman Ubochioma
{"title":"E.M.T.S.有限公司诉MTN通信有限公司&另一个:尼日利亚电信行业竞争法的执行是福还是祸?","authors":"Wiseman Ubochioma","doi":"10.15640/JBLE.V4N1A1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In February 2016, the Federal High Court made a seminal decision in Nigeria’s telecommunications industry. It struck out a suit filed by E.M.T.S. Limited (popularly known as Etisalat) against MTN over the latter’s acquisition of Visafone Communications Limited on the grounds that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the suit. This comment argues that the decision of the court should not be construed as “a missed opportunity” to address the topical issue of anti-competitive conduct in the sector. Instead, it represents a progressive step towards recognising the significance of exploration and compliance with the internal statutory procedures before bringing anti-competitive claims in courts. This would not only enhance compliance with the law but also avail an opportunity for courts to intervene and determine anticompetitive conduct in the sector if the sector-specific regulator fails to do so.","PeriodicalId":375048,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Business Law","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"E.M.T.S. Limited v. MTN Communications Limited & Another: Boon or Bane to Enforcement of Competition Law in Nigeria’s Telecommunications Sector?\",\"authors\":\"Wiseman Ubochioma\",\"doi\":\"10.15640/JBLE.V4N1A1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In February 2016, the Federal High Court made a seminal decision in Nigeria’s telecommunications industry. It struck out a suit filed by E.M.T.S. Limited (popularly known as Etisalat) against MTN over the latter’s acquisition of Visafone Communications Limited on the grounds that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the suit. This comment argues that the decision of the court should not be construed as “a missed opportunity” to address the topical issue of anti-competitive conduct in the sector. Instead, it represents a progressive step towards recognising the significance of exploration and compliance with the internal statutory procedures before bringing anti-competitive claims in courts. This would not only enhance compliance with the law but also avail an opportunity for courts to intervene and determine anticompetitive conduct in the sector if the sector-specific regulator fails to do so.\",\"PeriodicalId\":375048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Business Law\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Business Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15640/JBLE.V4N1A1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Business Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15640/JBLE.V4N1A1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2016年2月,联邦高等法院在尼日利亚电信业做出了一项开创性的决定。它驳回了emts有限公司(通常被称为Etisalat)针对MTN收购Visafone通信有限公司提起的诉讼,理由是它缺乏受理诉讼的管辖权。这一评论认为,法院的决定不应被解释为“错失了一个机会”,以解决该行业反竞争行为的热门问题。相反,它代表了一个渐进的步骤,即承认在向法院提出反竞争索赔之前,探索和遵守内部法定程序的重要性。这不仅可以加强对法律的遵守,而且还可以使法院有机会在特定部门的监管机构未能干预和确定该部门的反竞争行为时进行干预和确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
E.M.T.S. Limited v. MTN Communications Limited & Another: Boon or Bane to Enforcement of Competition Law in Nigeria’s Telecommunications Sector?
In February 2016, the Federal High Court made a seminal decision in Nigeria’s telecommunications industry. It struck out a suit filed by E.M.T.S. Limited (popularly known as Etisalat) against MTN over the latter’s acquisition of Visafone Communications Limited on the grounds that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the suit. This comment argues that the decision of the court should not be construed as “a missed opportunity” to address the topical issue of anti-competitive conduct in the sector. Instead, it represents a progressive step towards recognising the significance of exploration and compliance with the internal statutory procedures before bringing anti-competitive claims in courts. This would not only enhance compliance with the law but also avail an opportunity for courts to intervene and determine anticompetitive conduct in the sector if the sector-specific regulator fails to do so.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信