德语语篇的语篇分割

Wladimir Sidorenko, A. Peldszus, Manfred Stede
{"title":"德语语篇的语篇分割","authors":"Wladimir Sidorenko, A. Peldszus, Manfred Stede","doi":"10.21248/jlcl.30.2015.196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses the problem of segmenting German texts into minimal discourse units, as they are needed, for example, in RST-based discourse parsing. We discuss relevant variants of the problem, introduce the design of our annotation guidelines, and provide the results of an extensive interannotator agreement study of the corpus. Afterwards, we report on our experiments with three automatic classifiers that rely on the output of state-of-the-art parsers and use different amounts and kinds of syntactic knowledge: constituent parsing versus dependency parsing; tree-structure classification versus sequence labeling. Finally, we compare our approaches with the recent discourse segmentation methods proposed for English.","PeriodicalId":402489,"journal":{"name":"J. Lang. Technol. Comput. Linguistics","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discourse Segmentation of German Texts\",\"authors\":\"Wladimir Sidorenko, A. Peldszus, Manfred Stede\",\"doi\":\"10.21248/jlcl.30.2015.196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper addresses the problem of segmenting German texts into minimal discourse units, as they are needed, for example, in RST-based discourse parsing. We discuss relevant variants of the problem, introduce the design of our annotation guidelines, and provide the results of an extensive interannotator agreement study of the corpus. Afterwards, we report on our experiments with three automatic classifiers that rely on the output of state-of-the-art parsers and use different amounts and kinds of syntactic knowledge: constituent parsing versus dependency parsing; tree-structure classification versus sequence labeling. Finally, we compare our approaches with the recent discourse segmentation methods proposed for English.\",\"PeriodicalId\":402489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Lang. Technol. Comput. Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Lang. Technol. Comput. Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21248/jlcl.30.2015.196\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Lang. Technol. Comput. Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21248/jlcl.30.2015.196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

本文解决了将德语文本分割成最小语篇单元的问题,因为它们在基于rst的语篇解析中是必要的。我们讨论了该问题的相关变体,介绍了注释指南的设计,并提供了对语料库进行广泛的注释器间协议研究的结果。之后,我们报告了我们使用三种自动分类器的实验,这些自动分类器依赖于最先进的解析器的输出,并使用不同数量和种类的语法知识:成分解析与依赖解析;树结构分类与序列标记。最后,我们将我们的方法与最近提出的英语语篇分割方法进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discourse Segmentation of German Texts
This paper addresses the problem of segmenting German texts into minimal discourse units, as they are needed, for example, in RST-based discourse parsing. We discuss relevant variants of the problem, introduce the design of our annotation guidelines, and provide the results of an extensive interannotator agreement study of the corpus. Afterwards, we report on our experiments with three automatic classifiers that rely on the output of state-of-the-art parsers and use different amounts and kinds of syntactic knowledge: constituent parsing versus dependency parsing; tree-structure classification versus sequence labeling. Finally, we compare our approaches with the recent discourse segmentation methods proposed for English.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信