斯特拉霍夫的主体人类学:重建的经验

A. Masalov
{"title":"斯特拉霍夫的主体人类学:重建的经验","authors":"A. Masalov","doi":"10.18413/2408-932X-2019-5-1-0-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". The article provides a preliminary analysis of the philosophical and psycho-logical views of the Russian thinker of the XIX century Nikolai Strakhov on the problem of the subject. His reflections and conclusions are the experience of deep anthropology of personality which remain relevant in our time. The Strakhov’s approach was based on the Cartesian \"cogito, ergo sum\", but was supplemented by his peculiar pro-visions regarding the role of man as a \"spectator of the world\" and his central position in the system of the universe. The phenomenon of the subject was considered by Strakhov negatively and cannot be represented in terms of positive knowledge. The peculiarity of Strakhov’s anthropology can be considered in the context of not only later phenomenology, but also of the actual \"postmodern\" view of the problem of sub-jectivity.","PeriodicalId":434226,"journal":{"name":"RESEARH RESULT. SOCIAL STUDIES AND HUMANITIES","volume":"75 8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"STRAKHOV’s ANTHROPOLOGY OF THE SUBJECT: THE EXPERIENCE OF RECONSTRUCTION\",\"authors\":\"A. Masalov\",\"doi\":\"10.18413/2408-932X-2019-5-1-0-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". The article provides a preliminary analysis of the philosophical and psycho-logical views of the Russian thinker of the XIX century Nikolai Strakhov on the problem of the subject. His reflections and conclusions are the experience of deep anthropology of personality which remain relevant in our time. The Strakhov’s approach was based on the Cartesian \\\"cogito, ergo sum\\\", but was supplemented by his peculiar pro-visions regarding the role of man as a \\\"spectator of the world\\\" and his central position in the system of the universe. The phenomenon of the subject was considered by Strakhov negatively and cannot be represented in terms of positive knowledge. The peculiarity of Strakhov’s anthropology can be considered in the context of not only later phenomenology, but also of the actual \\\"postmodern\\\" view of the problem of sub-jectivity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":434226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RESEARH RESULT. SOCIAL STUDIES AND HUMANITIES\",\"volume\":\"75 8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RESEARH RESULT. SOCIAL STUDIES AND HUMANITIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18413/2408-932X-2019-5-1-0-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RESEARH RESULT. SOCIAL STUDIES AND HUMANITIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18413/2408-932X-2019-5-1-0-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

. 本文初步分析了十九世纪俄国思想家斯特拉霍夫关于主体问题的哲学和心理学观点。他的反思和结论是深刻的人格人类学经验,在我们这个时代仍然具有现实意义。斯特拉霍夫的方法是以笛卡尔的“我思故我”为基础的,但补充了他关于人作为“世界的旁观者”的角色和他在宇宙体系中的中心地位的独特设想。斯特拉霍夫认为主体现象是消极的,不能用积极的知识来表示。斯特拉霍夫人类学的独特性不仅可以在后来现象学的背景下考虑,而且可以在实际的“后现代”主体性问题观点的背景下考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
STRAKHOV’s ANTHROPOLOGY OF THE SUBJECT: THE EXPERIENCE OF RECONSTRUCTION
. The article provides a preliminary analysis of the philosophical and psycho-logical views of the Russian thinker of the XIX century Nikolai Strakhov on the problem of the subject. His reflections and conclusions are the experience of deep anthropology of personality which remain relevant in our time. The Strakhov’s approach was based on the Cartesian "cogito, ergo sum", but was supplemented by his peculiar pro-visions regarding the role of man as a "spectator of the world" and his central position in the system of the universe. The phenomenon of the subject was considered by Strakhov negatively and cannot be represented in terms of positive knowledge. The peculiarity of Strakhov’s anthropology can be considered in the context of not only later phenomenology, but also of the actual "postmodern" view of the problem of sub-jectivity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信