热力学和流体力学入门课程中基于问题的学习

Euan Coutts
{"title":"热力学和流体力学入门课程中基于问题的学习","authors":"Euan Coutts","doi":"10.35199/epde.2020.74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem-based learning (PBL) is a pedagogical approach which aims to create engaged and thorough long-term learning. Often achieved by setting problems centred around a challenge encountered in a discipline representative of a “real world” challenge. In the process of creating a new school of product design (SoPD) and associated degree programme at the University of Canterbury in New Zealand a PBL approach was adopted for a new course in fluid dynamics and thermodynamics, titled “Thermofluids”. Intended to provide students undertaking product design degrees sufficient understanding and appreciation of the material to apply theory to make informed design decisions when dealing with design challenges related to these areas. The school wished to take a novel approach to ensure that students would retain their understanding rather than a more essentialist pedagogical approach to teaching and assessment alone. The first task, to demonstrate their understanding of basic fluid dynamics, was to design and build a “waterclock”. A fluid driven means of marking the passage of time. The second task, to demonstrate their understanding of basic thermodynamics, was to design and build a “solar oven”. PBL challenges are typically open ended and intend to place the students at the centre of the process with educators serving as guiding hands rather than providing prescriptive instruction. The brief for each of these PBL challenges was kept deliberately open in line with PBL theory, the intention being for the students to determine their own parameters for success of the endeavour. However, some alterations were required regarding criteria for the tasks. Important to note that it was the absence of prescriptive criteria which presented an issue, not prescriptive instruction. The various reasons for this are discussed in the paper. Upon completion of the class students were asked to provide a class evaluation. Without prompting the PBL challenges were highlighted as a key positive of the class with students providing commentary that the challenges made the theory feel real and assisted with their understanding of the theory and helped them to prepare for the exam. The paper explores the nature of the PBL pedagogical approach and reflects critically upon the process in this class as a case study, providing insight and proposing theories thereon for further study.","PeriodicalId":372294,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education","volume":"2016 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Problem-based learning in introductory thermodynamics and fluid mechanics\",\"authors\":\"Euan Coutts\",\"doi\":\"10.35199/epde.2020.74\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Problem-based learning (PBL) is a pedagogical approach which aims to create engaged and thorough long-term learning. Often achieved by setting problems centred around a challenge encountered in a discipline representative of a “real world” challenge. In the process of creating a new school of product design (SoPD) and associated degree programme at the University of Canterbury in New Zealand a PBL approach was adopted for a new course in fluid dynamics and thermodynamics, titled “Thermofluids”. Intended to provide students undertaking product design degrees sufficient understanding and appreciation of the material to apply theory to make informed design decisions when dealing with design challenges related to these areas. The school wished to take a novel approach to ensure that students would retain their understanding rather than a more essentialist pedagogical approach to teaching and assessment alone. The first task, to demonstrate their understanding of basic fluid dynamics, was to design and build a “waterclock”. A fluid driven means of marking the passage of time. The second task, to demonstrate their understanding of basic thermodynamics, was to design and build a “solar oven”. PBL challenges are typically open ended and intend to place the students at the centre of the process with educators serving as guiding hands rather than providing prescriptive instruction. The brief for each of these PBL challenges was kept deliberately open in line with PBL theory, the intention being for the students to determine their own parameters for success of the endeavour. However, some alterations were required regarding criteria for the tasks. Important to note that it was the absence of prescriptive criteria which presented an issue, not prescriptive instruction. The various reasons for this are discussed in the paper. Upon completion of the class students were asked to provide a class evaluation. Without prompting the PBL challenges were highlighted as a key positive of the class with students providing commentary that the challenges made the theory feel real and assisted with their understanding of the theory and helped them to prepare for the exam. The paper explores the nature of the PBL pedagogical approach and reflects critically upon the process in this class as a case study, providing insight and proposing theories thereon for further study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":372294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education\",\"volume\":\"2016 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35199/epde.2020.74\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35199/epde.2020.74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于问题的学习(PBL)是一种教学方法,旨在创造参与和彻底的长期学习。通常通过围绕“现实世界”挑战的学科所遇到的挑战设置问题来实现。在新西兰坎特伯雷大学创建新产品设计学院(SoPD)和相关学位课程的过程中,一门名为“热流体”的流体动力学和热力学新课程采用了PBL方法。旨在为从事产品设计学位的学生提供充分的理解和欣赏材料,以便在处理与这些领域相关的设计挑战时应用理论做出明智的设计决策。学校希望采取一种新颖的方法,以确保学生能够保持他们的理解,而不是仅仅采用一种更本质的教学方法来进行教学和评估。为了展示他们对基本流体动力学的理解,第一个任务是设计和建造一个“水钟”。标记时间流逝的一种流体驱动的方法。第二项任务是设计并建造一个“太阳能烤箱”,以展示他们对基本热力学的理解。PBL的挑战通常是开放式的,旨在将学生置于过程的中心,教育者作为指导之手,而不是提供说明性的指导。每一个PBL挑战的简介都是根据PBL理论故意保持开放的,目的是让学生们确定自己努力成功的参数。但是,需要对任务的标准进行一些修改。重要的是要注意,这是缺乏规范性的标准,提出了一个问题,而不是规范性的指令。本文讨论了造成这种情况的各种原因。在课程结束后,学生们被要求对课程进行评估。在没有提示的情况下,PBL挑战被强调为课堂的一个关键积极因素,学生们提供评论,认为这些挑战使理论感觉真实,有助于他们理解理论,帮助他们准备考试。本文探讨了PBL教学方法的本质,并以案例研究的形式批判性地反思了这门课的教学过程,为进一步的研究提供了见解和理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Problem-based learning in introductory thermodynamics and fluid mechanics
Problem-based learning (PBL) is a pedagogical approach which aims to create engaged and thorough long-term learning. Often achieved by setting problems centred around a challenge encountered in a discipline representative of a “real world” challenge. In the process of creating a new school of product design (SoPD) and associated degree programme at the University of Canterbury in New Zealand a PBL approach was adopted for a new course in fluid dynamics and thermodynamics, titled “Thermofluids”. Intended to provide students undertaking product design degrees sufficient understanding and appreciation of the material to apply theory to make informed design decisions when dealing with design challenges related to these areas. The school wished to take a novel approach to ensure that students would retain their understanding rather than a more essentialist pedagogical approach to teaching and assessment alone. The first task, to demonstrate their understanding of basic fluid dynamics, was to design and build a “waterclock”. A fluid driven means of marking the passage of time. The second task, to demonstrate their understanding of basic thermodynamics, was to design and build a “solar oven”. PBL challenges are typically open ended and intend to place the students at the centre of the process with educators serving as guiding hands rather than providing prescriptive instruction. The brief for each of these PBL challenges was kept deliberately open in line with PBL theory, the intention being for the students to determine their own parameters for success of the endeavour. However, some alterations were required regarding criteria for the tasks. Important to note that it was the absence of prescriptive criteria which presented an issue, not prescriptive instruction. The various reasons for this are discussed in the paper. Upon completion of the class students were asked to provide a class evaluation. Without prompting the PBL challenges were highlighted as a key positive of the class with students providing commentary that the challenges made the theory feel real and assisted with their understanding of the theory and helped them to prepare for the exam. The paper explores the nature of the PBL pedagogical approach and reflects critically upon the process in this class as a case study, providing insight and proposing theories thereon for further study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信