网络通信演进对空中交通系统的影响——滋扰或国家风险

Kenneth Duncan, David Hoenigmann, Terrol S. Guyah
{"title":"网络通信演进对空中交通系统的影响——滋扰或国家风险","authors":"Kenneth Duncan, David Hoenigmann, Terrol S. Guyah","doi":"10.1109/ICNS58246.2023.10124331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evolution of telecommunications transport networks from synchronous to asynchronous communications is mass-market commercial service driven, where operational affordability and efficiencies for telecommunications network providers are realized. However, while delivering advancements in capabilities and services, the product quality has suffered for consumers, sacrificing phone voice call quality for the flexibility, mobility and functionality of smart phone devices, as evidenced by the change in advertisements from \"a pin drop\" to \"can you hear me now\" [1]. In aviation and other safety centric industries, accurate and precise network timing are critical for applications reliant on integrated communications. These applications require consistent guaranteed data delivery measured using a network timing capability that is absent in asynchronous networks, which introduces packet delay variation (i.e., jitter), packet loss, and inconsistent latency characteristics in the performance of these systems. Approximately 90% of applications supporting air traffic navigation require the network timing capability inherent in synchronous communications networks but the slow migration of these applications to use native asynchronous communications has been outpaced by the telecommunications industry sunsetting of the underlying synchronous services and equipment. There are mature hardware based technologies (e.g., tunneling) dedicated to migrate data from systems reliant on synchronous networks, unaltered, for transport over asynchronous packet switched networks. Aided by existing network protocols (e.g., QoS, Sync Ethernet, Frequency based PTP, SD-WAN, Segment routing, and Traffic Engineering), these hardware-based technologies have been successful in providing communications for a subset of these systems that require guaranteed data delivery but lab vs real-world experience migrating these applications have delivered mixed results due to the end-application sensitivity to network performance variability.An alternative to terrestrial asynchronous networks for successful communications of native synchronous or sensitive asynchronous/IP applications leverage the proliferation and acceptance of newer fixed wireless last mile network transport technologies such as 5G and Low Earth Orbit Satellite (LEO), offering even greater performance variance compared to terrestrial asynchronous networks. While 5G testing in under optimal conditions has shown promise, field testing has been less successful due to the inconsistency in real-world network performance. The LEO constellations are not yet mature to perform adequate testing but the expectation is to perform this evaluation in the near future as the constellation coverage gaps are closed.With such varying degrees of success when transporting native synchronous or sensitive asynchronous/IP applications over modern asynchronous networks, there are two basic approaches for addressing the effects of the network communications evolution away from synchronous technologies. First, migrate the existing applications to IP-based asynchronous networks, optimizing the network for last mile transport. Second, upgrade the applications and system architecture to reduce inherent dependency on predictable network performance simply not available with asynchronous network technologies. Either approach requires characterizing the real-world network performance dependencies of precision time-sensitive applications to determine the viability of the modern telecommunication transport technologies, and migrate those synchronous applications without impacting operational usability and safety. Ultimately, application modernization is the best solution for asynchronous transport communications (i.e., native packet/IP transport) with prioritization based on business/operational need, ability for intermediate migration strategies, and time and budget constraints.Is the impending sunsetting of synchronous technologies just a nuisance that can be overcome with personnel and budget investments, or is there an impending risk to the safety of critical systems such as air traffic navigations systems? In this paper, we explore technologies and techniques that can be used to overcome the effect of emerging communications technologies on air traffic navigation systems that rely on integrated communications for air-navigation services.","PeriodicalId":103699,"journal":{"name":"2023 Integrated Communication, Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Network Communications Evolution’s Effects on Air Traffic Systems – Nuisance or National Risk\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth Duncan, David Hoenigmann, Terrol S. Guyah\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICNS58246.2023.10124331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The evolution of telecommunications transport networks from synchronous to asynchronous communications is mass-market commercial service driven, where operational affordability and efficiencies for telecommunications network providers are realized. However, while delivering advancements in capabilities and services, the product quality has suffered for consumers, sacrificing phone voice call quality for the flexibility, mobility and functionality of smart phone devices, as evidenced by the change in advertisements from \\\"a pin drop\\\" to \\\"can you hear me now\\\" [1]. In aviation and other safety centric industries, accurate and precise network timing are critical for applications reliant on integrated communications. These applications require consistent guaranteed data delivery measured using a network timing capability that is absent in asynchronous networks, which introduces packet delay variation (i.e., jitter), packet loss, and inconsistent latency characteristics in the performance of these systems. Approximately 90% of applications supporting air traffic navigation require the network timing capability inherent in synchronous communications networks but the slow migration of these applications to use native asynchronous communications has been outpaced by the telecommunications industry sunsetting of the underlying synchronous services and equipment. There are mature hardware based technologies (e.g., tunneling) dedicated to migrate data from systems reliant on synchronous networks, unaltered, for transport over asynchronous packet switched networks. Aided by existing network protocols (e.g., QoS, Sync Ethernet, Frequency based PTP, SD-WAN, Segment routing, and Traffic Engineering), these hardware-based technologies have been successful in providing communications for a subset of these systems that require guaranteed data delivery but lab vs real-world experience migrating these applications have delivered mixed results due to the end-application sensitivity to network performance variability.An alternative to terrestrial asynchronous networks for successful communications of native synchronous or sensitive asynchronous/IP applications leverage the proliferation and acceptance of newer fixed wireless last mile network transport technologies such as 5G and Low Earth Orbit Satellite (LEO), offering even greater performance variance compared to terrestrial asynchronous networks. While 5G testing in under optimal conditions has shown promise, field testing has been less successful due to the inconsistency in real-world network performance. The LEO constellations are not yet mature to perform adequate testing but the expectation is to perform this evaluation in the near future as the constellation coverage gaps are closed.With such varying degrees of success when transporting native synchronous or sensitive asynchronous/IP applications over modern asynchronous networks, there are two basic approaches for addressing the effects of the network communications evolution away from synchronous technologies. First, migrate the existing applications to IP-based asynchronous networks, optimizing the network for last mile transport. Second, upgrade the applications and system architecture to reduce inherent dependency on predictable network performance simply not available with asynchronous network technologies. Either approach requires characterizing the real-world network performance dependencies of precision time-sensitive applications to determine the viability of the modern telecommunication transport technologies, and migrate those synchronous applications without impacting operational usability and safety. Ultimately, application modernization is the best solution for asynchronous transport communications (i.e., native packet/IP transport) with prioritization based on business/operational need, ability for intermediate migration strategies, and time and budget constraints.Is the impending sunsetting of synchronous technologies just a nuisance that can be overcome with personnel and budget investments, or is there an impending risk to the safety of critical systems such as air traffic navigations systems? In this paper, we explore technologies and techniques that can be used to overcome the effect of emerging communications technologies on air traffic navigation systems that rely on integrated communications for air-navigation services.\",\"PeriodicalId\":103699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 Integrated Communication, Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 Integrated Communication, Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNS58246.2023.10124331\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 Integrated Communication, Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNS58246.2023.10124331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电信传输网络从同步通信到异步通信的演变是由大众市场商业服务驱动的,在这种情况下,电信网络提供商的操作负担能力和效率得以实现。然而,在提供功能和服务方面的进步的同时,消费者的产品质量却受到了影响,为了智能手机设备的灵活性、移动性和功能性而牺牲了电话语音通话质量,广告从“一根针掉下来”变成“你现在能听到我说话吗”就证明了这一点[1]。在航空和其他以安全为中心的行业中,准确和精确的网络定时对于依赖于集成通信的应用至关重要。这些应用程序需要使用异步网络中不存在的网络定时功能来测量一致的有保证的数据传递,这会在这些系统的性能中引入数据包延迟变化(即抖动)、数据包丢失和不一致的延迟特征。大约90%支持空中交通导航的应用程序需要同步通信网络中固有的网络定时能力,但是这些应用程序向使用本地异步通信的缓慢迁移已经被电信行业底层同步服务和设备的衰落所超越。有成熟的基于硬件的技术(例如,隧道)专门用于从依赖于同步网络的系统中迁移数据,而不改变,以便在异步分组交换网络上进行传输。在现有网络协议(例如,QoS、同步以太网、基于频率的PTP、SD-WAN、分段路由和流量工程)的帮助下,这些基于硬件的技术已经成功地为这些需要保证数据传输的系统子集提供了通信,但由于最终应用程序对网络性能变化的敏感性,实验室与现实世界的经验迁移这些应用程序已经交付了混合结果。对于本地同步或敏感异步/IP应用程序的成功通信,地面异步网络的替代方案利用了更新的固定无线最后一英里网络传输技术(如5G和低地球轨道卫星(LEO))的扩散和接受,与地面异步网络相比,提供了更大的性能差异。虽然在最佳条件下进行的5G测试显示出了希望,但由于实际网络性能不一致,现场测试并不那么成功。LEO星座还没有成熟到可以进行充分的测试,但预计在不久的将来,随着星座覆盖差距的缩小,将进行这项评估。由于在现代异步网络上传输本地同步或敏感异步/IP应用程序的成功程度不同,因此有两种基本方法可以解决网络通信从同步技术发展而来的影响。首先,将现有应用程序迁移到基于ip的异步网络,为最后一英里传输优化网络。其次,升级应用程序和系统架构,以减少对异步网络技术无法提供的可预测网络性能的固有依赖。这两种方法都需要描述精确时间敏感应用程序的真实网络性能依赖关系,以确定现代电信传输技术的可行性,并在不影响操作可用性和安全性的情况下迁移这些同步应用程序。最终,应用程序现代化是异步传输通信(即本机数据包/IP传输)的最佳解决方案,其优先级基于业务/操作需求、中间迁移策略的能力以及时间和预算限制。同步技术即将到来的衰落仅仅是一个可以通过人力和预算投资来克服的麻烦,还是对关键系统(如空中交通导航系统)的安全存在迫在眉睫的风险?在本文中,我们探索了可用于克服新兴通信技术对依赖集成通信的空中导航服务的空中交通导航系统的影响的技术和方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Network Communications Evolution’s Effects on Air Traffic Systems – Nuisance or National Risk
The evolution of telecommunications transport networks from synchronous to asynchronous communications is mass-market commercial service driven, where operational affordability and efficiencies for telecommunications network providers are realized. However, while delivering advancements in capabilities and services, the product quality has suffered for consumers, sacrificing phone voice call quality for the flexibility, mobility and functionality of smart phone devices, as evidenced by the change in advertisements from "a pin drop" to "can you hear me now" [1]. In aviation and other safety centric industries, accurate and precise network timing are critical for applications reliant on integrated communications. These applications require consistent guaranteed data delivery measured using a network timing capability that is absent in asynchronous networks, which introduces packet delay variation (i.e., jitter), packet loss, and inconsistent latency characteristics in the performance of these systems. Approximately 90% of applications supporting air traffic navigation require the network timing capability inherent in synchronous communications networks but the slow migration of these applications to use native asynchronous communications has been outpaced by the telecommunications industry sunsetting of the underlying synchronous services and equipment. There are mature hardware based technologies (e.g., tunneling) dedicated to migrate data from systems reliant on synchronous networks, unaltered, for transport over asynchronous packet switched networks. Aided by existing network protocols (e.g., QoS, Sync Ethernet, Frequency based PTP, SD-WAN, Segment routing, and Traffic Engineering), these hardware-based technologies have been successful in providing communications for a subset of these systems that require guaranteed data delivery but lab vs real-world experience migrating these applications have delivered mixed results due to the end-application sensitivity to network performance variability.An alternative to terrestrial asynchronous networks for successful communications of native synchronous or sensitive asynchronous/IP applications leverage the proliferation and acceptance of newer fixed wireless last mile network transport technologies such as 5G and Low Earth Orbit Satellite (LEO), offering even greater performance variance compared to terrestrial asynchronous networks. While 5G testing in under optimal conditions has shown promise, field testing has been less successful due to the inconsistency in real-world network performance. The LEO constellations are not yet mature to perform adequate testing but the expectation is to perform this evaluation in the near future as the constellation coverage gaps are closed.With such varying degrees of success when transporting native synchronous or sensitive asynchronous/IP applications over modern asynchronous networks, there are two basic approaches for addressing the effects of the network communications evolution away from synchronous technologies. First, migrate the existing applications to IP-based asynchronous networks, optimizing the network for last mile transport. Second, upgrade the applications and system architecture to reduce inherent dependency on predictable network performance simply not available with asynchronous network technologies. Either approach requires characterizing the real-world network performance dependencies of precision time-sensitive applications to determine the viability of the modern telecommunication transport technologies, and migrate those synchronous applications without impacting operational usability and safety. Ultimately, application modernization is the best solution for asynchronous transport communications (i.e., native packet/IP transport) with prioritization based on business/operational need, ability for intermediate migration strategies, and time and budget constraints.Is the impending sunsetting of synchronous technologies just a nuisance that can be overcome with personnel and budget investments, or is there an impending risk to the safety of critical systems such as air traffic navigations systems? In this paper, we explore technologies and techniques that can be used to overcome the effect of emerging communications technologies on air traffic navigation systems that rely on integrated communications for air-navigation services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信