乌克兰国家立法中药学领域发明补充保护法律规制的关键问题

Anastasiia Homeniuk
{"title":"乌克兰国家立法中药学领域发明补充保护法律规制的关键问题","authors":"Anastasiia Homeniuk","doi":"10.33731/62021.249108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Keywords: supplementary protection certificate, basic patent, procedure for obtainingsupplementary protection certificate \nKey issues of legal regulation of the supplementary protection of inventionsin the field of pharmacy in the national legislation of UkraineThe article is devoted to the study of key issues of legal regulation of supplementaryprotection of inventions after the adoption of the Law of Ukraine «On Amendmentsto Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine on Patent Legislation Reform» in the absenceof bylaws to regulate the procedure for issuing supplementary protection certificates.The study also highlights the main shortcomings and gaps in the regulation ofcertain issues of application of supplementary protection certificates in the currentLaw of Ukraine «On protection of rights to inventions and utility models.»The author in details analyses European Union approaches to definition of thesubject matter of the supplementary protection, providing criteria which are recommendedto use in order to decide whether the product is covered by the basicpatent in force. Also, the paper is focusing on the issues related to verification ofdata and materials provided together with the application for a certificate — suchas whether the requirement that the medicinal product must be submitted formarketing authorization in Ukraine no later than during one year after it’s first marketing authorization in the world, whether the authorization provided is thefirst authorization in Ukraine, etc.Another problem which is highlighted in the study is the application of the rule tosubmit the petition for obtaining supplementary protection to those patents and marketingauthorizations which were issued before the amendments to the Law came inforce, as this question remained unresolved due to the lack of transitional provisionsin the Law. Also author points out the necessity to align the provisions of the Article271 of the Law of Ukraine «On Protection of Rights to Inventions and Utility Models»regarding the definition of the subject matter of supplementary protection in accordancewith patent legislation by excluding application of the medicinal product fromthe list as it is not patentable according to Ukrainian law. In addition, the author emphasizedthe urge to adopt relevant bylaws (procedure) regulating the issue of certificatesof supplementary protection.","PeriodicalId":356184,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Key issues of legal regulation of the supplementary protection of inventions in the field of pharmacy in the national legislation of Ukraine\",\"authors\":\"Anastasiia Homeniuk\",\"doi\":\"10.33731/62021.249108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Keywords: supplementary protection certificate, basic patent, procedure for obtainingsupplementary protection certificate \\nKey issues of legal regulation of the supplementary protection of inventionsin the field of pharmacy in the national legislation of UkraineThe article is devoted to the study of key issues of legal regulation of supplementaryprotection of inventions after the adoption of the Law of Ukraine «On Amendmentsto Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine on Patent Legislation Reform» in the absenceof bylaws to regulate the procedure for issuing supplementary protection certificates.The study also highlights the main shortcomings and gaps in the regulation ofcertain issues of application of supplementary protection certificates in the currentLaw of Ukraine «On protection of rights to inventions and utility models.»The author in details analyses European Union approaches to definition of thesubject matter of the supplementary protection, providing criteria which are recommendedto use in order to decide whether the product is covered by the basicpatent in force. Also, the paper is focusing on the issues related to verification ofdata and materials provided together with the application for a certificate — suchas whether the requirement that the medicinal product must be submitted formarketing authorization in Ukraine no later than during one year after it’s first marketing authorization in the world, whether the authorization provided is thefirst authorization in Ukraine, etc.Another problem which is highlighted in the study is the application of the rule tosubmit the petition for obtaining supplementary protection to those patents and marketingauthorizations which were issued before the amendments to the Law came inforce, as this question remained unresolved due to the lack of transitional provisionsin the Law. Also author points out the necessity to align the provisions of the Article271 of the Law of Ukraine «On Protection of Rights to Inventions and Utility Models»regarding the definition of the subject matter of supplementary protection in accordancewith patent legislation by excluding application of the medicinal product fromthe list as it is not patentable according to Ukrainian law. In addition, the author emphasizedthe urge to adopt relevant bylaws (procedure) regulating the issue of certificatesof supplementary protection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33731/62021.249108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33731/62021.249108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关键词:补充保护证书、基础专利、获得补充保护证书的程序乌克兰国家立法中药学领域发明补充保护的法律规定的关键问题本文致力于研究在没有规定颁发程序的细则的情况下,通过乌克兰法律“关于修改乌克兰专利立法改革的某些立法法案”后,发明补充保护的法律规定的关键问题补充防护证书。该研究还强调了乌克兰现行《关于保护发明和实用新型权利的法律》在适用补充保护证书的某些问题上的主要缺陷和差距。作者详细分析了欧盟对补充保护客体的定义方法,提供了建议使用的标准,以决定产品是否被有效的基本专利所覆盖。此外,本文还重点讨论了与申请证书一起提供的数据和材料的验证相关问题例如药品是否必须在全球首次上市许可后一年内提交乌克兰上市许可的要求,所提供的授权是否为乌克兰的首次授权,研究中强调的另一个问题是,对于在《专利法》修正案生效之前已发布的专利和销售授权,提交获得补充保护的请愿书的规则的适用问题,由于该法缺乏过渡性规定,这一问题仍未得到解决。作者还指出,有必要根据乌克兰“关于保护发明和实用新型权利”的法律第271条的规定,根据专利法对补充保护的主题进行定义,将药品的申请从清单中排除,因为根据乌克兰法律,药品不可授予专利权。此外,作者强调迫切需要通过相关的规章(程序)来规范补充保护证书的颁发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Key issues of legal regulation of the supplementary protection of inventions in the field of pharmacy in the national legislation of Ukraine
Keywords: supplementary protection certificate, basic patent, procedure for obtainingsupplementary protection certificate Key issues of legal regulation of the supplementary protection of inventionsin the field of pharmacy in the national legislation of UkraineThe article is devoted to the study of key issues of legal regulation of supplementaryprotection of inventions after the adoption of the Law of Ukraine «On Amendmentsto Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine on Patent Legislation Reform» in the absenceof bylaws to regulate the procedure for issuing supplementary protection certificates.The study also highlights the main shortcomings and gaps in the regulation ofcertain issues of application of supplementary protection certificates in the currentLaw of Ukraine «On protection of rights to inventions and utility models.»The author in details analyses European Union approaches to definition of thesubject matter of the supplementary protection, providing criteria which are recommendedto use in order to decide whether the product is covered by the basicpatent in force. Also, the paper is focusing on the issues related to verification ofdata and materials provided together with the application for a certificate — suchas whether the requirement that the medicinal product must be submitted formarketing authorization in Ukraine no later than during one year after it’s first marketing authorization in the world, whether the authorization provided is thefirst authorization in Ukraine, etc.Another problem which is highlighted in the study is the application of the rule tosubmit the petition for obtaining supplementary protection to those patents and marketingauthorizations which were issued before the amendments to the Law came inforce, as this question remained unresolved due to the lack of transitional provisionsin the Law. Also author points out the necessity to align the provisions of the Article271 of the Law of Ukraine «On Protection of Rights to Inventions and Utility Models»regarding the definition of the subject matter of supplementary protection in accordancewith patent legislation by excluding application of the medicinal product fromthe list as it is not patentable according to Ukrainian law. In addition, the author emphasizedthe urge to adopt relevant bylaws (procedure) regulating the issue of certificatesof supplementary protection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信