商事法院行政违法案件简易审理的可采性

N. A. Morozova
{"title":"商事法院行政违法案件简易审理的可采性","authors":"N. A. Morozova","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-4-23-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author of the article argues that cases of administrative offenses in arbitration courts should not be considered in simplified procedure, since this contradicts the essence of administrative responsibility.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inadmissibility of Summary Hearing of Administrative Offense Cases by Commercial Courts\",\"authors\":\"N. A. Morozova\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-4-23-26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author of the article argues that cases of administrative offenses in arbitration courts should not be considered in simplified procedure, since this contradicts the essence of administrative responsibility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-4-23-26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-4-23-26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的作者认为,仲裁法院的行政违法案件不应简化程序,因为这与行政责任的本质相矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inadmissibility of Summary Hearing of Administrative Offense Cases by Commercial Courts
The author of the article argues that cases of administrative offenses in arbitration courts should not be considered in simplified procedure, since this contradicts the essence of administrative responsibility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信