MIM与NPN选择器对双极RRAM阵列动态功率的影响

V. Kumar, U. Ganguly
{"title":"MIM与NPN选择器对双极RRAM阵列动态功率的影响","authors":"V. Kumar, U. Ganguly","doi":"10.1109/NVMTS.2014.7060864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally, DC power reduction based on half-select based sneak-path leakage reduction has been the primary metric to evaluate the effectiveness of a selector technology in RRAM arrays. In this paper, we show that dynamic power is comparable and even dominant consideration. We compare MIM selector with NPN technology to compare DC and dynamic power. MIM selector has poor non-linearity and high capacitance due to the implementation with thin high-k dielectrics to ensure high on-current density. NPN selector has better non-linearity as well as lower capacitance as p-region can be thick without compromising non-linearity or on-current density. Consequently overall NPN has lower power based on both DC and dynamic power considerations. In NPN technology, dynamic power is comparable to DC power at sub-30nm nodes. It dominates at sub-15nm node at 100MHz while it dominates at sub-50nm nodes at 1GHz. Thus, selector technology needs to be evaluated and even optimized for dynamic power.","PeriodicalId":275170,"journal":{"name":"2014 14th Annual Non-Volatile Memory Technology Symposium (NVMTS)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of MIM versus NPN selector on dynamic power in bipolar RRAM array\",\"authors\":\"V. Kumar, U. Ganguly\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NVMTS.2014.7060864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traditionally, DC power reduction based on half-select based sneak-path leakage reduction has been the primary metric to evaluate the effectiveness of a selector technology in RRAM arrays. In this paper, we show that dynamic power is comparable and even dominant consideration. We compare MIM selector with NPN technology to compare DC and dynamic power. MIM selector has poor non-linearity and high capacitance due to the implementation with thin high-k dielectrics to ensure high on-current density. NPN selector has better non-linearity as well as lower capacitance as p-region can be thick without compromising non-linearity or on-current density. Consequently overall NPN has lower power based on both DC and dynamic power considerations. In NPN technology, dynamic power is comparable to DC power at sub-30nm nodes. It dominates at sub-15nm node at 100MHz while it dominates at sub-50nm nodes at 1GHz. Thus, selector technology needs to be evaluated and even optimized for dynamic power.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 14th Annual Non-Volatile Memory Technology Symposium (NVMTS)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 14th Annual Non-Volatile Memory Technology Symposium (NVMTS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NVMTS.2014.7060864\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 14th Annual Non-Volatile Memory Technology Symposium (NVMTS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NVMTS.2014.7060864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

传统上,基于半选择的直流功耗降低是评估RRAM阵列中选择器技术有效性的主要指标。在本文中,我们证明了动态权力是可比较的甚至是主导的考虑因素。我们将MIM选择器与NPN技术进行比较,以比较直流和动态功率。由于采用薄的高k介电体来保证高导通电流密度,MIM选择器具有较差的非线性和高电容。NPN选择器具有更好的非线性和更低的电容,因为p区可以厚而不影响非线性或电流密度。因此,基于直流和动态功率的考虑,总体NPN具有较低的功率。在NPN技术中,30nm以下节点的动态功率与直流功率相当。它在100MHz的15nm以下节点上占主导地位,而在1GHz的50nm以下节点上占主导地位。因此,需要对选择器技术进行评估,甚至针对动态功率进行优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of MIM versus NPN selector on dynamic power in bipolar RRAM array
Traditionally, DC power reduction based on half-select based sneak-path leakage reduction has been the primary metric to evaluate the effectiveness of a selector technology in RRAM arrays. In this paper, we show that dynamic power is comparable and even dominant consideration. We compare MIM selector with NPN technology to compare DC and dynamic power. MIM selector has poor non-linearity and high capacitance due to the implementation with thin high-k dielectrics to ensure high on-current density. NPN selector has better non-linearity as well as lower capacitance as p-region can be thick without compromising non-linearity or on-current density. Consequently overall NPN has lower power based on both DC and dynamic power considerations. In NPN technology, dynamic power is comparable to DC power at sub-30nm nodes. It dominates at sub-15nm node at 100MHz while it dominates at sub-50nm nodes at 1GHz. Thus, selector technology needs to be evaluated and even optimized for dynamic power.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信