俄罗斯刑事诉讼中“主体性法的拒绝”与“法律的限制”概念的关联

I. Chebotareva, O. Pashutina, I. Revina
{"title":"俄罗斯刑事诉讼中“主体性法的拒绝”与“法律的限制”概念的关联","authors":"I. Chebotareva, O. Pashutina, I. Revina","doi":"10.21869/2223-1501-2021-11-6-109-119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance. In domestic legal science in general, and in the theory of criminal procedure in particular, there is no unity of views on the relationship between the concepts of \"restriction of rights\" and \"waiver of rights\". Meanwhile, the study of the issue of conjugation of these concepts is important, because in the conditions of the initially unequal position of the individual and the state represented by officials and bodies, the possibility of using coercion by them, which is especially clearly manifested in the field of criminal proceedings, the confusion of these concepts and their unjustified substitution are fraught with illegal infringement of the rights and freedoms of the individual, possible abuses by officials conducting criminal proceedings. These circumstances necessitate a scientific understanding of the problem of the relationship between the restriction of the rights and freedoms of the individual and the rejection of subjective rights. Purpose - to study the relationship between the concepts of \"restriction of rights\" and \"waiver of rights\" in the domestic doctrine of criminal procedure law. Objective. To achieve the stated goal, the authors study the concept of limitation of law and refusal of subjective law in criminal proceedings, which are available in the domestic doctrine of law, based on the signs of these two legal phenomena, and identify their relationship. Methodology. The research is based on the universal dialectical method of scientific knowledge and general scientific methods based on it (analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction), as well as specific scientific methods of cognition (formal-logical, formal-legal, etc.). Results. Authors formulated the concepts of \"restriction of rights in criminal procedure \" and \"waiver of rights in criminal procedure\". Conclusion. Restriction of rights and waiver of rights are independent legal phenomena that have different legal nature and purpose.","PeriodicalId":359562,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: History and Law","volume":"779 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation Between the Concepts of \\\"Refusal of Subjective Law\\\" and \\\"Restriction of Law\\\" in Russian Criminal Procedure\",\"authors\":\"I. Chebotareva, O. Pashutina, I. Revina\",\"doi\":\"10.21869/2223-1501-2021-11-6-109-119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Relevance. In domestic legal science in general, and in the theory of criminal procedure in particular, there is no unity of views on the relationship between the concepts of \\\"restriction of rights\\\" and \\\"waiver of rights\\\". Meanwhile, the study of the issue of conjugation of these concepts is important, because in the conditions of the initially unequal position of the individual and the state represented by officials and bodies, the possibility of using coercion by them, which is especially clearly manifested in the field of criminal proceedings, the confusion of these concepts and their unjustified substitution are fraught with illegal infringement of the rights and freedoms of the individual, possible abuses by officials conducting criminal proceedings. These circumstances necessitate a scientific understanding of the problem of the relationship between the restriction of the rights and freedoms of the individual and the rejection of subjective rights. Purpose - to study the relationship between the concepts of \\\"restriction of rights\\\" and \\\"waiver of rights\\\" in the domestic doctrine of criminal procedure law. Objective. To achieve the stated goal, the authors study the concept of limitation of law and refusal of subjective law in criminal proceedings, which are available in the domestic doctrine of law, based on the signs of these two legal phenomena, and identify their relationship. Methodology. The research is based on the universal dialectical method of scientific knowledge and general scientific methods based on it (analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction), as well as specific scientific methods of cognition (formal-logical, formal-legal, etc.). Results. Authors formulated the concepts of \\\"restriction of rights in criminal procedure \\\" and \\\"waiver of rights in criminal procedure\\\". Conclusion. Restriction of rights and waiver of rights are independent legal phenomena that have different legal nature and purpose.\",\"PeriodicalId\":359562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: History and Law\",\"volume\":\"779 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: History and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2021-11-6-109-119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: History and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2021-11-6-109-119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

的相关性。在一般的国内法学界,特别是在刑事诉讼理论中,对于“权利限制”与“权利放弃”概念之间的关系并没有统一的看法。同时,研究这些概念的结合问题很重要,因为在官员和机构所代表的个人和国家最初处于不平等地位的情况下,他们可能使用强制手段,这在刑事诉讼领域尤为明显,这些概念的混淆和它们的不合理替代充满了对个人权利和自由的非法侵犯。进行刑事诉讼的官员可能滥用职权。在这种情况下,有必要科学地理解限制个人权利和自由与拒绝主观权利之间的关系问题。目的:研究国内刑事诉讼法理论中“权利限制”与“权利放弃”概念的关系。目标。为达到上述目的,笔者在分析刑事诉讼中法律限制和主观法拒绝两种法律现象的基础上,对国内法理中刑事诉讼中法律限制和主观法拒绝的概念进行了研究,并对两者之间的关系进行了辨析。方法。研究的基础是科学知识的普遍辩证法和以此为基础的一般科学方法(分析、综合、归纳、演绎),以及具体的科学认知方法(形式-逻辑、形式-法律等)。结果。笔者提出了“刑事诉讼权利限制”和“刑事诉讼权利放弃”的概念。结论。权利限制与权利放弃是独立的法律现象,具有不同的法律性质和目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Correlation Between the Concepts of "Refusal of Subjective Law" and "Restriction of Law" in Russian Criminal Procedure
Relevance. In domestic legal science in general, and in the theory of criminal procedure in particular, there is no unity of views on the relationship between the concepts of "restriction of rights" and "waiver of rights". Meanwhile, the study of the issue of conjugation of these concepts is important, because in the conditions of the initially unequal position of the individual and the state represented by officials and bodies, the possibility of using coercion by them, which is especially clearly manifested in the field of criminal proceedings, the confusion of these concepts and their unjustified substitution are fraught with illegal infringement of the rights and freedoms of the individual, possible abuses by officials conducting criminal proceedings. These circumstances necessitate a scientific understanding of the problem of the relationship between the restriction of the rights and freedoms of the individual and the rejection of subjective rights. Purpose - to study the relationship between the concepts of "restriction of rights" and "waiver of rights" in the domestic doctrine of criminal procedure law. Objective. To achieve the stated goal, the authors study the concept of limitation of law and refusal of subjective law in criminal proceedings, which are available in the domestic doctrine of law, based on the signs of these two legal phenomena, and identify their relationship. Methodology. The research is based on the universal dialectical method of scientific knowledge and general scientific methods based on it (analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction), as well as specific scientific methods of cognition (formal-logical, formal-legal, etc.). Results. Authors formulated the concepts of "restriction of rights in criminal procedure " and "waiver of rights in criminal procedure". Conclusion. Restriction of rights and waiver of rights are independent legal phenomena that have different legal nature and purpose.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信