正式证明布尔毕达哥拉斯三元组猜想

L. Cruz-Filipe, Peter Schneider-Kamp
{"title":"正式证明布尔毕达哥拉斯三元组猜想","authors":"L. Cruz-Filipe, Peter Schneider-Kamp","doi":"10.29007/jvdj","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2016, Heule, Kullmann and Marek solved the Boolean Pythagorean Triples problem: is there a binary coloring of the natural numbers such that every Pythagorean triple contains an element of each color? By encoding a finite portion of this problem as a propositional formula and showing its unsatisfiability, they established that such a coloring does not exist. Subsequently, this answer was verified by a correct-by-construction checker extracted from a Coq formalization, which was able to reproduce the original proof. However, none of these works address the question of formally addressing the relationship between the propositional formula that was constructed and the mathematical problem being considered. In this work, we formalize the Boolean Pythagorean Triples problem in Coq. We recursively define a family of propositional formulas, parameterized on a natural number n , and show that unsatisfiability of this formula for any particular n implies that there does not exist a solution to the problem. We then formalize the mathematical argument behind the simplification step in the original proof of unsatisfiability and the logical argument underlying cube-and-conquer, obtaining a verified proof of Heule et al. ’s solution.","PeriodicalId":207621,"journal":{"name":"Logic Programming and Automated Reasoning","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formally Proving the Boolean Pythagorean Triples Conjecture\",\"authors\":\"L. Cruz-Filipe, Peter Schneider-Kamp\",\"doi\":\"10.29007/jvdj\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2016, Heule, Kullmann and Marek solved the Boolean Pythagorean Triples problem: is there a binary coloring of the natural numbers such that every Pythagorean triple contains an element of each color? By encoding a finite portion of this problem as a propositional formula and showing its unsatisfiability, they established that such a coloring does not exist. Subsequently, this answer was verified by a correct-by-construction checker extracted from a Coq formalization, which was able to reproduce the original proof. However, none of these works address the question of formally addressing the relationship between the propositional formula that was constructed and the mathematical problem being considered. In this work, we formalize the Boolean Pythagorean Triples problem in Coq. We recursively define a family of propositional formulas, parameterized on a natural number n , and show that unsatisfiability of this formula for any particular n implies that there does not exist a solution to the problem. We then formalize the mathematical argument behind the simplification step in the original proof of unsatisfiability and the logical argument underlying cube-and-conquer, obtaining a verified proof of Heule et al. ’s solution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":207621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Logic Programming and Automated Reasoning\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Logic Programming and Automated Reasoning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29007/jvdj\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logic Programming and Automated Reasoning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29007/jvdj","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

2016年,Heule, Kullmann和Marek解决了布尔毕达哥拉斯三元组问题:自然数是否存在二进制着色,使得每个毕达哥拉斯三元组都包含每种颜色的元素?通过将这个问题的有限部分编码为命题公式,并显示其不满足性,他们确定了这样的着色不存在。随后,这个答案被从Coq形式化中提取的构造正确检查器验证,该检查器能够复制原始证明。然而,这些作品都没有解决正式解决所构建的命题公式与所考虑的数学问题之间关系的问题。在这项工作中,我们形式化了Coq中的布尔毕达哥拉斯三元组问题。我们递归地定义了一组参数化在自然数n上的命题公式,并证明了该公式对任意特定n的不满足性意味着问题不存在解。然后,我们形式化了原始不可满足证明中简化步骤背后的数学论证和立方征服背后的逻辑论证,获得了Heule等人解的验证证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Formally Proving the Boolean Pythagorean Triples Conjecture
In 2016, Heule, Kullmann and Marek solved the Boolean Pythagorean Triples problem: is there a binary coloring of the natural numbers such that every Pythagorean triple contains an element of each color? By encoding a finite portion of this problem as a propositional formula and showing its unsatisfiability, they established that such a coloring does not exist. Subsequently, this answer was verified by a correct-by-construction checker extracted from a Coq formalization, which was able to reproduce the original proof. However, none of these works address the question of formally addressing the relationship between the propositional formula that was constructed and the mathematical problem being considered. In this work, we formalize the Boolean Pythagorean Triples problem in Coq. We recursively define a family of propositional formulas, parameterized on a natural number n , and show that unsatisfiability of this formula for any particular n implies that there does not exist a solution to the problem. We then formalize the mathematical argument behind the simplification step in the original proof of unsatisfiability and the logical argument underlying cube-and-conquer, obtaining a verified proof of Heule et al. ’s solution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信