一团奇怪的疑云

Michael F. Davis
{"title":"一团奇怪的疑云","authors":"Michael F. Davis","doi":"10.2307/j.ctt20krxc7.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A number of the stories in Dubliners have what we might call “oblique” titles that, instead of pointing directly to an apparent principal character or an ostensible major theme, point away to seemingly secondary characters, subordinate themes, or minor—even incidental—narrative concerns.1 Consider, for example, the first and last stories. While “The Sisters” is primarily concerned with the young boy–protagonist’s processing of the death of a priest with whom he had a fairly intimate relationship, the title identifies the secondary figures of the priest’s two sisters, directing our attention to their sisterly part in upholding illusions concerning the dead priest/brother and to their eventual disillusionment. While the last story, “The Dead,” is primarily concerned both with the adult Gabriel Conroy’s attempts to uphold illusions of himself and with his eventual disillusionment, the title singles out what seems to be a more widespread theme of death. Although both stories have oblique titles, these titles might be said to activate similar but reverse lines of signification. It has been suggested that while “The Sisters” might have made a more “appropriate” title for “The Dead,” “The Dead” might have been a more appropriate title for “The Sisters.” While the first story’s title might point across the volume to the last story, the last title points across the volume to the first. Thus, Joyce’s use of titles functions like the rhetorical stitch of a double chiasmus, by which, as he suggests himself in Finnegans Wake, Dubliners is “doublends jined,” or “double ends [Dublin’s] joined.”2 In addition to the beginning and ending stories of Dubliners, a number of stories near the middle also have oblique titles, including “Counterparts” and “Clay,” both of which identify specialized objects in the text that are not actually named and elevate these objects into leading narrative conceits. The title “Counterparts” activates a highly specialized term to","PeriodicalId":330014,"journal":{"name":"Joyce Studies Annual","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Little Cloud of Queer Suspicion\",\"authors\":\"Michael F. Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctt20krxc7.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A number of the stories in Dubliners have what we might call “oblique” titles that, instead of pointing directly to an apparent principal character or an ostensible major theme, point away to seemingly secondary characters, subordinate themes, or minor—even incidental—narrative concerns.1 Consider, for example, the first and last stories. While “The Sisters” is primarily concerned with the young boy–protagonist’s processing of the death of a priest with whom he had a fairly intimate relationship, the title identifies the secondary figures of the priest’s two sisters, directing our attention to their sisterly part in upholding illusions concerning the dead priest/brother and to their eventual disillusionment. While the last story, “The Dead,” is primarily concerned both with the adult Gabriel Conroy’s attempts to uphold illusions of himself and with his eventual disillusionment, the title singles out what seems to be a more widespread theme of death. Although both stories have oblique titles, these titles might be said to activate similar but reverse lines of signification. It has been suggested that while “The Sisters” might have made a more “appropriate” title for “The Dead,” “The Dead” might have been a more appropriate title for “The Sisters.” While the first story’s title might point across the volume to the last story, the last title points across the volume to the first. Thus, Joyce’s use of titles functions like the rhetorical stitch of a double chiasmus, by which, as he suggests himself in Finnegans Wake, Dubliners is “doublends jined,” or “double ends [Dublin’s] joined.”2 In addition to the beginning and ending stories of Dubliners, a number of stories near the middle also have oblique titles, including “Counterparts” and “Clay,” both of which identify specialized objects in the text that are not actually named and elevate these objects into leading narrative conceits. The title “Counterparts” activates a highly specialized term to\",\"PeriodicalId\":330014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Joyce Studies Annual\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Joyce Studies Annual\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt20krxc7.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joyce Studies Annual","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt20krxc7.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

《都柏林人》中的许多故事都有我们可以称之为“隐晦”的标题,即不是直接指向一个明显的主要人物或一个表面上的主要主题,而是指向看似次要的人物、次要的主题或次要的——甚至是偶然的——叙事问题例如,考虑第一个和最后一个故事。虽然《姐妹》主要关注的是年轻的男孩主角如何处理与他有相当亲密关系的牧师的死亡,但标题确定了牧师的两个姐妹的次要人物,将我们的注意力引导到姐妹们在维护关于死去的牧师/兄弟的幻想和最终幻灭的过程中所扮演的角色。最后一个故事《亡者》(the Dead)主要讲述的是成年后的加布里埃尔·康罗伊(Gabriel Conroy)试图维护自己的幻想,以及他最终的幻灭,但这个标题却突出了一个似乎更为普遍的死亡主题。虽然这两个故事都有隐晦的标题,但这些标题可以说是激活了相似但相反的意义线。有人认为,虽然《The Sisters》可能更适合《The Dead》,但《The Dead》可能更适合《The Sisters》。虽然第一个故事的标题可能会穿过卷指向最后一个故事,但最后一个标题会穿过卷指向第一个故事。因此,乔伊斯对标题的使用就像双重交错的修辞缝线一样,正如他在《芬尼根守灵夜》中所暗示的那样,都柏林人是“双重混合的”,或者是“都柏林的双重终点的”。2除了《都柏林人》的开头和结尾故事外,中间部分的一些故事也有隐晦的标题,包括“对口者”和“粘土”,这两个故事都确定了文本中没有实际命名的特殊物体,并将这些物体提升为主要的叙事幻想。标题“对应物”激活了一个高度专业化的术语
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Little Cloud of Queer Suspicion
A number of the stories in Dubliners have what we might call “oblique” titles that, instead of pointing directly to an apparent principal character or an ostensible major theme, point away to seemingly secondary characters, subordinate themes, or minor—even incidental—narrative concerns.1 Consider, for example, the first and last stories. While “The Sisters” is primarily concerned with the young boy–protagonist’s processing of the death of a priest with whom he had a fairly intimate relationship, the title identifies the secondary figures of the priest’s two sisters, directing our attention to their sisterly part in upholding illusions concerning the dead priest/brother and to their eventual disillusionment. While the last story, “The Dead,” is primarily concerned both with the adult Gabriel Conroy’s attempts to uphold illusions of himself and with his eventual disillusionment, the title singles out what seems to be a more widespread theme of death. Although both stories have oblique titles, these titles might be said to activate similar but reverse lines of signification. It has been suggested that while “The Sisters” might have made a more “appropriate” title for “The Dead,” “The Dead” might have been a more appropriate title for “The Sisters.” While the first story’s title might point across the volume to the last story, the last title points across the volume to the first. Thus, Joyce’s use of titles functions like the rhetorical stitch of a double chiasmus, by which, as he suggests himself in Finnegans Wake, Dubliners is “doublends jined,” or “double ends [Dublin’s] joined.”2 In addition to the beginning and ending stories of Dubliners, a number of stories near the middle also have oblique titles, including “Counterparts” and “Clay,” both of which identify specialized objects in the text that are not actually named and elevate these objects into leading narrative conceits. The title “Counterparts” activates a highly specialized term to
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信