提高卷积神经网络误差鲁棒性的策略

António Morais, R. Barbosa, Nuno Lourenço, F. Cerveira, M. Lombardi, H. Madeira
{"title":"提高卷积神经网络误差鲁棒性的策略","authors":"António Morais, R. Barbosa, Nuno Lourenço, F. Cerveira, M. Lombardi, H. Madeira","doi":"10.1109/QRS57517.2022.00092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The error robustness of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) is an important attribute requiring attention due to their growing application in safety-critical domains such as autonomous driving and medical devices. Hardware errors affecting the execution of such models may lead to system failures and, therefore, fault tolerance techniques are necessary to improve dependability. This paper proposes an approach to improve the robustness of CNNs and experimentally compares it with three other existing techniques. Fault injection is used to emulate hardware faults affecting CNNs targeting four distinct datasets. Results indicate that the ranger technique globally provides the best robustness closely followed by the stimulated training technique, although the former provides much lower temporal overhead than the latter. Architectural redundancy and dropout provide varying results. In all cases, caution through final evaluation of any CNN is required, because there are corner cases in which the robustness decreases, contrary to the intended outcome.","PeriodicalId":143812,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies for Improving the Error Robustness of Convolutional Neural Networks\",\"authors\":\"António Morais, R. Barbosa, Nuno Lourenço, F. Cerveira, M. Lombardi, H. Madeira\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/QRS57517.2022.00092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The error robustness of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) is an important attribute requiring attention due to their growing application in safety-critical domains such as autonomous driving and medical devices. Hardware errors affecting the execution of such models may lead to system failures and, therefore, fault tolerance techniques are necessary to improve dependability. This paper proposes an approach to improve the robustness of CNNs and experimentally compares it with three other existing techniques. Fault injection is used to emulate hardware faults affecting CNNs targeting four distinct datasets. Results indicate that the ranger technique globally provides the best robustness closely followed by the stimulated training technique, although the former provides much lower temporal overhead than the latter. Architectural redundancy and dropout provide varying results. In all cases, caution through final evaluation of any CNN is required, because there are corner cases in which the robustness decreases, contrary to the intended outcome.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS57517.2022.00092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS57517.2022.00092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于卷积神经网络(cnn)在自动驾驶和医疗设备等安全关键领域的应用越来越广泛,其误差鲁棒性是一个需要关注的重要属性。影响这些模型执行的硬件错误可能导致系统故障,因此,需要容错技术来提高可靠性。本文提出了一种提高cnn鲁棒性的方法,并与其他三种现有技术进行了实验比较。故障注入用于模拟针对四个不同数据集影响cnn的硬件故障。结果表明,游骑兵技术在整体上提供了最好的鲁棒性,其次是受刺激训练技术,尽管前者提供的时间开销远低于后者。架构冗余和dropout提供了不同的结果。在所有情况下,通过对任何CNN的最终评估都需要谨慎,因为存在与预期结果相反的鲁棒性下降的边缘情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategies for Improving the Error Robustness of Convolutional Neural Networks
The error robustness of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) is an important attribute requiring attention due to their growing application in safety-critical domains such as autonomous driving and medical devices. Hardware errors affecting the execution of such models may lead to system failures and, therefore, fault tolerance techniques are necessary to improve dependability. This paper proposes an approach to improve the robustness of CNNs and experimentally compares it with three other existing techniques. Fault injection is used to emulate hardware faults affecting CNNs targeting four distinct datasets. Results indicate that the ranger technique globally provides the best robustness closely followed by the stimulated training technique, although the former provides much lower temporal overhead than the latter. Architectural redundancy and dropout provide varying results. In all cases, caution through final evaluation of any CNN is required, because there are corner cases in which the robustness decreases, contrary to the intended outcome.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信