美国短期薪酬计划的异质性裁员效应

Pub Date : 2020-10-05 DOI:10.1111/labr.12184
Marlon R. Tracey, Solomon W. Polachek
{"title":"美国短期薪酬计划的异质性裁员效应","authors":"Marlon R. Tracey,&nbsp;Solomon W. Polachek","doi":"10.1111/labr.12184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Short-Time Compensation (STC) program enables US firms to reduce work hours via pro-rated Unemployment Insurance (UI) benefits, rather than relying on layoffs as a cost-cutting tool. Despite the program's potential to preclude skill loss and rehiring/retraining costs, firms' participation rates are still very low in response to economic downturns. Using firm-level UI administrative data and semi-parametric methods, we show why by illustrating which type of firms benefit from the program and which do not. A key finding is that cyclically sensitive firms have about 14% lower layoff rates when they use STC, but we find no difference for more cyclically stable firms.</p>","PeriodicalId":92093,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"34 4","pages":"399-426"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/labr.12184","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heterogeneous Layoff Effects of the US Short-Time Compensation Program\",\"authors\":\"Marlon R. Tracey,&nbsp;Solomon W. Polachek\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/labr.12184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Short-Time Compensation (STC) program enables US firms to reduce work hours via pro-rated Unemployment Insurance (UI) benefits, rather than relying on layoffs as a cost-cutting tool. Despite the program's potential to preclude skill loss and rehiring/retraining costs, firms' participation rates are still very low in response to economic downturns. Using firm-level UI administrative data and semi-parametric methods, we show why by illustrating which type of firms benefit from the program and which do not. A key finding is that cyclically sensitive firms have about 14% lower layoff rates when they use STC, but we find no difference for more cyclically stable firms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"399-426\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/labr.12184\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/labr.12184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/labr.12184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

短期补偿(STC)计划使美国公司能够通过按比例分配的失业保险(UI)福利来减少工作时间,而不是依靠裁员作为削减成本的工具。尽管该计划有可能避免技能流失和再招聘/再培训成本,但在经济低迷时期,企业的参与率仍然很低。利用企业层面的UI管理数据和半参数方法,我们通过说明哪些类型的企业从该计划中受益,哪些没有,来说明原因。一个关键的发现是,当周期敏感的公司使用STC时,裁员率降低了约14%,但我们发现周期稳定的公司没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Heterogeneous Layoff Effects of the US Short-Time Compensation Program

The Short-Time Compensation (STC) program enables US firms to reduce work hours via pro-rated Unemployment Insurance (UI) benefits, rather than relying on layoffs as a cost-cutting tool. Despite the program's potential to preclude skill loss and rehiring/retraining costs, firms' participation rates are still very low in response to economic downturns. Using firm-level UI administrative data and semi-parametric methods, we show why by illustrating which type of firms benefit from the program and which do not. A key finding is that cyclically sensitive firms have about 14% lower layoff rates when they use STC, but we find no difference for more cyclically stable firms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信