将腹肌筋膜疼痛综合征误诊为前皮神经卡压综合征:非特异性腹痛患者是否失败?

N. G
{"title":"将腹肌筋膜疼痛综合征误诊为前皮神经卡压综合征:非特异性腹痛患者是否失败?","authors":"N. G","doi":"10.36076/pmcr.2019/3/91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Chronic abdominal wall pain\n(CAWP) is often undiagnosed and results in\nsignificant health care use as well as patient\nsuffering. There are two main types: abdominal\nmyofascial pain syndrome (AMPS) and anterior\ncutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome\n(ACNES). Although the 2 conditions share clinical\nsimilarities, they have subtly distinct unique\nfeatures.\nObjectives: To highlight the current practice,\nelucidate the characteristics of the 2 types of\nCAWP, and direct the spotlight on abdominal\nmyofascial pain.\nStudy Design: Prospective case series.\nSetting: Tertiary pain medicine clinic in a university\nhospital.\nMethods: As a part of a prospective audit of\nmanagement of chronic abdominal pain, patients\ncompleted brief pain inventory-short form\nquestionnaires at baseline and at 3 months posttrigger\npoint treatment.\nResults: All 3 patients were misdiagnosed with\nACNES. Patient 1 was attending the emergency\ndepartment once every 5 days prior to being correctly\ndiagnosed with AMPS. Following trigger\npoint treatment, there was a significant reduction\nin emergency department attendance. Patient 2,\nwith a 10-year history of lower abdominal pain that\nresulted in severe disability, was able to mobilize\nfollowing trigger point treatment. Patient 3, with\na high opioid use (360 mg per day), was able to\ndiscontinue opioids following ultrasound-guided\ntrigger point injection with depot steroids.\nLimitations: Open label case series in a small\ncohort.\nConclusions: AMPS is as common as the various\nvisceral inflammatory diseases. Lack of awareness,\nignoring its existence, and misdiagnosing it\nmay not benefit patients with chronic abdominal\npain.\nKey words: Chronic abdominal wall pain, abdominal\nmyofascial pain syndrome, anterior cutaneous\nnerve entrapment syndrome, viscerosomatic\nconvergence","PeriodicalId":110696,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Case Reports","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Misdiagnosing Abdominal Myofascial Pain Syndrome as Anterior\\nCutaneous Nerve Entrapment Syndrome: Are we Failing Patients with\\nNonspecific Abdominal Pain?\",\"authors\":\"N. G\",\"doi\":\"10.36076/pmcr.2019/3/91\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Chronic abdominal wall pain\\n(CAWP) is often undiagnosed and results in\\nsignificant health care use as well as patient\\nsuffering. There are two main types: abdominal\\nmyofascial pain syndrome (AMPS) and anterior\\ncutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome\\n(ACNES). Although the 2 conditions share clinical\\nsimilarities, they have subtly distinct unique\\nfeatures.\\nObjectives: To highlight the current practice,\\nelucidate the characteristics of the 2 types of\\nCAWP, and direct the spotlight on abdominal\\nmyofascial pain.\\nStudy Design: Prospective case series.\\nSetting: Tertiary pain medicine clinic in a university\\nhospital.\\nMethods: As a part of a prospective audit of\\nmanagement of chronic abdominal pain, patients\\ncompleted brief pain inventory-short form\\nquestionnaires at baseline and at 3 months posttrigger\\npoint treatment.\\nResults: All 3 patients were misdiagnosed with\\nACNES. Patient 1 was attending the emergency\\ndepartment once every 5 days prior to being correctly\\ndiagnosed with AMPS. Following trigger\\npoint treatment, there was a significant reduction\\nin emergency department attendance. Patient 2,\\nwith a 10-year history of lower abdominal pain that\\nresulted in severe disability, was able to mobilize\\nfollowing trigger point treatment. Patient 3, with\\na high opioid use (360 mg per day), was able to\\ndiscontinue opioids following ultrasound-guided\\ntrigger point injection with depot steroids.\\nLimitations: Open label case series in a small\\ncohort.\\nConclusions: AMPS is as common as the various\\nvisceral inflammatory diseases. Lack of awareness,\\nignoring its existence, and misdiagnosing it\\nmay not benefit patients with chronic abdominal\\npain.\\nKey words: Chronic abdominal wall pain, abdominal\\nmyofascial pain syndrome, anterior cutaneous\\nnerve entrapment syndrome, viscerosomatic\\nconvergence\",\"PeriodicalId\":110696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Management Case Reports\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Management Case Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36076/pmcr.2019/3/91\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36076/pmcr.2019/3/91","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:慢性腹壁疼痛(CAWP)往往是未确诊的,结果无关紧要的卫生保健使用和患者的痛苦。主要有两种类型:腹肌筋膜疼痛综合征(AMPS)和前皮神经卡压综合征(ACNES)。虽然这两种情况在临床上有相似之处,但它们有微妙的不同的特点。目的:总结目前的临床实践,阐明两种类型的cawp的特点,引导人们关注腹肌筋膜疼痛。研究设计:前瞻性病例系列。地点:某大学附属医院三级疼痛医学门诊。方法:作为慢性腹痛管理前瞻性审计的一部分,患者在基线和触发点治疗后3个月完成简短的疼痛调查表。结果:3例患者均被误诊为acnes。患者1在被正确诊断为AMPS之前每5天去一次急诊科。在触发点治疗后,急诊科的出勤率显著降低。患者2有10年的下腹部疼痛史,导致严重残疾,在触发点治疗后能够活动。患者3,高阿片类药物使用(每天360毫克),在超声引导触发点注射储存类固醇后能够停止阿片类药物。局限性:开放标签病例系列在一个小队列。结论:AMPS与各种内脏炎性疾病一样常见。缺乏意识,忽视它的存在,误诊它可能不利于慢性腹痛患者。关键词:慢性腹壁痛,腹肌筋膜痛综合征,前皮神经卡压综合征,脏器束敛
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Misdiagnosing Abdominal Myofascial Pain Syndrome as Anterior Cutaneous Nerve Entrapment Syndrome: Are we Failing Patients with Nonspecific Abdominal Pain?
Background: Chronic abdominal wall pain (CAWP) is often undiagnosed and results in significant health care use as well as patient suffering. There are two main types: abdominal myofascial pain syndrome (AMPS) and anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES). Although the 2 conditions share clinical similarities, they have subtly distinct unique features. Objectives: To highlight the current practice, elucidate the characteristics of the 2 types of CAWP, and direct the spotlight on abdominal myofascial pain. Study Design: Prospective case series. Setting: Tertiary pain medicine clinic in a university hospital. Methods: As a part of a prospective audit of management of chronic abdominal pain, patients completed brief pain inventory-short form questionnaires at baseline and at 3 months posttrigger point treatment. Results: All 3 patients were misdiagnosed with ACNES. Patient 1 was attending the emergency department once every 5 days prior to being correctly diagnosed with AMPS. Following trigger point treatment, there was a significant reduction in emergency department attendance. Patient 2, with a 10-year history of lower abdominal pain that resulted in severe disability, was able to mobilize following trigger point treatment. Patient 3, with a high opioid use (360 mg per day), was able to discontinue opioids following ultrasound-guided trigger point injection with depot steroids. Limitations: Open label case series in a small cohort. Conclusions: AMPS is as common as the various visceral inflammatory diseases. Lack of awareness, ignoring its existence, and misdiagnosing it may not benefit patients with chronic abdominal pain. Key words: Chronic abdominal wall pain, abdominal myofascial pain syndrome, anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome, viscerosomatic convergence
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信