市场回报和两种关注的故事

Zhi Da, Jian Hua, Chih-Ching Hung, Lin Peng
{"title":"市场回报和两种关注的故事","authors":"Zhi Da, Jian Hua, Chih-Ching Hung, Lin Peng","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3551662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We find that aggregate retail attention to firms (ARA) strongly and negatively predicts future market returns, especially in down markets and during high VIX periods. In contrast, aggregate institutional attention to firms (AIA) weakly but positively predicts future market returns. Periods of high ARA are associated with greater net buying by retail investors. On the other hand, AIA leads ARA, and AIA’s positive market return predictability is stronger when retail investors are inattentive or ahead of major news announcements. Our results suggest that attention facilitates institutional investors’ acquisition of valuable information, while retail attention delays the diffusion of negative news.","PeriodicalId":365642,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Behavioral Finance (Microeconomics) (Topic)","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Market Returns and a Tale of Two Types of Attention\",\"authors\":\"Zhi Da, Jian Hua, Chih-Ching Hung, Lin Peng\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3551662\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We find that aggregate retail attention to firms (ARA) strongly and negatively predicts future market returns, especially in down markets and during high VIX periods. In contrast, aggregate institutional attention to firms (AIA) weakly but positively predicts future market returns. Periods of high ARA are associated with greater net buying by retail investors. On the other hand, AIA leads ARA, and AIA’s positive market return predictability is stronger when retail investors are inattentive or ahead of major news announcements. Our results suggest that attention facilitates institutional investors’ acquisition of valuable information, while retail attention delays the diffusion of negative news.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Behavioral Finance (Microeconomics) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Behavioral Finance (Microeconomics) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3551662\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Behavioral Finance (Microeconomics) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3551662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

我们发现,对公司的总零售关注(ARA)强烈且负向地预测未来的市场回报,特别是在下跌市场和高波动率时期。相比之下,机构对公司的总体关注(AIA)对未来市场回报的预测微弱但积极。ARA高的时期与散户投资者的净买入增加有关。另一方面,AIA领先于ARA,当散户投资者不注意或在重大新闻发布之前,AIA的正市场回报可预测性更强。我们的研究结果表明,关注有助于机构投资者获得有价值的信息,而散户的关注则延迟了负面新闻的传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Market Returns and a Tale of Two Types of Attention
We find that aggregate retail attention to firms (ARA) strongly and negatively predicts future market returns, especially in down markets and during high VIX periods. In contrast, aggregate institutional attention to firms (AIA) weakly but positively predicts future market returns. Periods of high ARA are associated with greater net buying by retail investors. On the other hand, AIA leads ARA, and AIA’s positive market return predictability is stronger when retail investors are inattentive or ahead of major news announcements. Our results suggest that attention facilitates institutional investors’ acquisition of valuable information, while retail attention delays the diffusion of negative news.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信