论交易无效事由的基本观点

V. Goncharova
{"title":"论交易无效事由的基本观点","authors":"V. Goncharova","doi":"10.19073/2306-1340-2018-15-3-372-376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the question of determining the concept of “invalidation of transactions”, the prevailing approach is the one that determines such grounds as defects in the transaction structure (in terms of will and will, subject composition, content and form), leading to the possibility of qualifying it as invalid. This view can be characterized as formal, based on a literal interpretation of legislative norms. This approach suggests the author to oppose the essential approach, proceeding from the interpretation of the grounds as the reasons for the legal regulation of legal institutions in one form or another. At the same time, the key category in determining the content of such grounds is the category of interest as a specific social need for the legal regulation of certain social relations resulting from the economic structure of society and the political features of its development.","PeriodicalId":404478,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of the Omsk Law Academy","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Essential View on the Grounds of Invalidity of Bargains\",\"authors\":\"V. Goncharova\",\"doi\":\"10.19073/2306-1340-2018-15-3-372-376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the question of determining the concept of “invalidation of transactions”, the prevailing approach is the one that determines such grounds as defects in the transaction structure (in terms of will and will, subject composition, content and form), leading to the possibility of qualifying it as invalid. This view can be characterized as formal, based on a literal interpretation of legislative norms. This approach suggests the author to oppose the essential approach, proceeding from the interpretation of the grounds as the reasons for the legal regulation of legal institutions in one form or another. At the same time, the key category in determining the content of such grounds is the category of interest as a specific social need for the legal regulation of certain social relations resulting from the economic structure of society and the political features of its development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":404478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik of the Omsk Law Academy\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik of the Omsk Law Academy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19073/2306-1340-2018-15-3-372-376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of the Omsk Law Academy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19073/2306-1340-2018-15-3-372-376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在确定“交易无效”概念的问题上,普遍的做法是确定交易结构(在意志和意志、主体构成、内容和形式方面)存在缺陷等理由,从而有可能将其定性为无效。这种观点可以被认为是正式的,基于对立法规范的字面解释。这种方法建议作者反对本质方法,从将理由解释为以某种形式对法律机构进行法律规制的理由出发。与此同时,决定这些理由内容的关键范畴是利益范畴,即对社会经济结构及其发展的政治特征所产生的某些社会关系进行法律调节的特定社会需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Essential View on the Grounds of Invalidity of Bargains
In the question of determining the concept of “invalidation of transactions”, the prevailing approach is the one that determines such grounds as defects in the transaction structure (in terms of will and will, subject composition, content and form), leading to the possibility of qualifying it as invalid. This view can be characterized as formal, based on a literal interpretation of legislative norms. This approach suggests the author to oppose the essential approach, proceeding from the interpretation of the grounds as the reasons for the legal regulation of legal institutions in one form or another. At the same time, the key category in determining the content of such grounds is the category of interest as a specific social need for the legal regulation of certain social relations resulting from the economic structure of society and the political features of its development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信