基于改进AHP-FCE的变电站扩建与储能站共建方案比较

Jianhua Huang, Haohui Xie, H. Ouyang, Zhangyang Sun, Nanxing Chen, Z. Du
{"title":"基于改进AHP-FCE的变电站扩建与储能站共建方案比较","authors":"Jianhua Huang, Haohui Xie, H. Ouyang, Zhangyang Sun, Nanxing Chen, Z. Du","doi":"10.1109/ICPES56491.2022.10073025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the development of the social economy, the increase in urban load density leads to the shortage of substation power supply capacity. In order to meet the demand for short-term peak load, two schemes are typically adopted: substation capacity expansion and co-construction of energy storage stations. However, both schemes have their advantages and disadvantages. In order to better select the scheme, it is necessary to establish a reasonable comprehensive evaluation index system. This paper proposes a scheme comparison method based on improved AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) – FCE (Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation). We construct the evaluation index system for substation capacity expansion and co-construction of energy storage stations. Then, the comprehensive evaluation scores under the two schemes are obtained using the AHP method to calculate the weight of each index, combined with fuzzy comprehensive evaluation.","PeriodicalId":425438,"journal":{"name":"2022 12th International Conference on Power and Energy Systems (ICPES)","volume":"94 8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scheme Comparison of Substation Expansion and Energy Storage Station Co-construction Based on Improved AHP-FCE\",\"authors\":\"Jianhua Huang, Haohui Xie, H. Ouyang, Zhangyang Sun, Nanxing Chen, Z. Du\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICPES56491.2022.10073025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the development of the social economy, the increase in urban load density leads to the shortage of substation power supply capacity. In order to meet the demand for short-term peak load, two schemes are typically adopted: substation capacity expansion and co-construction of energy storage stations. However, both schemes have their advantages and disadvantages. In order to better select the scheme, it is necessary to establish a reasonable comprehensive evaluation index system. This paper proposes a scheme comparison method based on improved AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) – FCE (Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation). We construct the evaluation index system for substation capacity expansion and co-construction of energy storage stations. Then, the comprehensive evaluation scores under the two schemes are obtained using the AHP method to calculate the weight of each index, combined with fuzzy comprehensive evaluation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":425438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 12th International Conference on Power and Energy Systems (ICPES)\",\"volume\":\"94 8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 12th International Conference on Power and Energy Systems (ICPES)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPES56491.2022.10073025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 12th International Conference on Power and Energy Systems (ICPES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPES56491.2022.10073025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着社会经济的发展,城市负荷密度的增加导致变电站供电能力不足。为满足短期高峰负荷的需求,一般采用变电站扩容和储能站共建两种方案。然而,这两种方案都有其优点和缺点。为了更好地选择方案,有必要建立合理的综合评价指标体系。提出了一种基于改进的层次分析法-模糊综合评价法的方案比较方法。构建了变电站扩容与储能站共建的评价指标体系。然后,采用AHP法计算各指标的权重,结合模糊综合评价得到两种方案下的综合评价得分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scheme Comparison of Substation Expansion and Energy Storage Station Co-construction Based on Improved AHP-FCE
With the development of the social economy, the increase in urban load density leads to the shortage of substation power supply capacity. In order to meet the demand for short-term peak load, two schemes are typically adopted: substation capacity expansion and co-construction of energy storage stations. However, both schemes have their advantages and disadvantages. In order to better select the scheme, it is necessary to establish a reasonable comprehensive evaluation index system. This paper proposes a scheme comparison method based on improved AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) – FCE (Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation). We construct the evaluation index system for substation capacity expansion and co-construction of energy storage stations. Then, the comprehensive evaluation scores under the two schemes are obtained using the AHP method to calculate the weight of each index, combined with fuzzy comprehensive evaluation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信