设计一个门户网站验证整容手术信息网站

A. Parikh, A. Clarke, P. Butler
{"title":"设计一个门户网站验证整容手术信息网站","authors":"A. Parikh, A. Clarke, P. Butler","doi":"10.5580/1ca6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Patients are increasingly accessing the Internet to obtain medical information. However, there have been many concerns about the difficulty in assessing the accuracy of this information. Although many website rating tools exist, the vast majority of these are unusable by consumers. Finding valid and up to date information can be very challenging and time consuming for patients. Methods: We analysed the first 200 websites are a Google search on \"cosmetic surgery\" using a combination of consumer and clinician based website rating tools. After identifying the \"top scoring\" websites we designed a \"gateway\" website and used these sites as links. Results: Eighty-nine percent of the websites did not meet the standard as described by the website rating tools. We also describe the method of design of the \"gateway\" website. Conclusions: Patients need to be better informed about the difficulty in obtaining accurate, valid information on the Internet. By directing patients to validated websites, clinicians can ease this problem. There are several resource issues that need to be addressed in order to maintain a website. WHAT WAS KNOWN BEFORE THE STUDY? Obtaining valid, accurate and up to date medical information is very difficult for the layperson. The usage of the Internet to obtain medical information is on the rise. There have been many instruments designed to assess the quality of health information websites; the vast majority of these cannot be used practically by laypersons. Physicians are often unlikely to recommend other websites as URL's change and many sites are not maintained and reviewed regularly. In disciplines such as cosmetic surgery, physicians may be reluctant to recommend a competitor's website. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS Independent clinicians are best placed to assess the quality of medical websites. There is no need to design anymore websites on cosmetic surgery (or any other discipline) as there are over 16 million in existence. Using a combination of consumer and clinician based website assessment tools a “gateway” website has been designed. This “gateway” site can be recommended without any prejudice and is regularly maintained.","PeriodicalId":284795,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Plastic Surgery","volume":"93 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing A Portal To Validated Cosmetic Surgery Information Websites\",\"authors\":\"A. Parikh, A. Clarke, P. Butler\",\"doi\":\"10.5580/1ca6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Patients are increasingly accessing the Internet to obtain medical information. However, there have been many concerns about the difficulty in assessing the accuracy of this information. Although many website rating tools exist, the vast majority of these are unusable by consumers. Finding valid and up to date information can be very challenging and time consuming for patients. Methods: We analysed the first 200 websites are a Google search on \\\"cosmetic surgery\\\" using a combination of consumer and clinician based website rating tools. After identifying the \\\"top scoring\\\" websites we designed a \\\"gateway\\\" website and used these sites as links. Results: Eighty-nine percent of the websites did not meet the standard as described by the website rating tools. We also describe the method of design of the \\\"gateway\\\" website. Conclusions: Patients need to be better informed about the difficulty in obtaining accurate, valid information on the Internet. By directing patients to validated websites, clinicians can ease this problem. There are several resource issues that need to be addressed in order to maintain a website. WHAT WAS KNOWN BEFORE THE STUDY? Obtaining valid, accurate and up to date medical information is very difficult for the layperson. The usage of the Internet to obtain medical information is on the rise. There have been many instruments designed to assess the quality of health information websites; the vast majority of these cannot be used practically by laypersons. Physicians are often unlikely to recommend other websites as URL's change and many sites are not maintained and reviewed regularly. In disciplines such as cosmetic surgery, physicians may be reluctant to recommend a competitor's website. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS Independent clinicians are best placed to assess the quality of medical websites. There is no need to design anymore websites on cosmetic surgery (or any other discipline) as there are over 16 million in existence. Using a combination of consumer and clinician based website assessment tools a “gateway” website has been designed. This “gateway” site can be recommended without any prejudice and is regularly maintained.\",\"PeriodicalId\":284795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Internet Journal of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"93 4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Internet Journal of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5580/1ca6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/1ca6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:越来越多的患者通过互联网获取医疗信息。然而,人们对评估这一信息的准确性有许多担忧。虽然存在许多网站评级工具,但绝大多数都无法被消费者使用。对患者来说,寻找有效和最新的信息可能非常具有挑战性和耗时。方法:我们分析了谷歌搜索“整容手术”的前200个网站,使用基于消费者和临床医生的网站评级工具的组合。在确定“得分最高”的网站后,我们设计了一个“门户”网站,并将这些网站用作链接。结果:89%的网站不符合网站评级工具所描述的标准。我们还描述了“门户”网站的设计方法。结论:患者需要更好地了解在互联网上获取准确、有效信息的困难。通过引导患者访问经过验证的网站,临床医生可以缓解这个问题。为了维护一个网站,有几个资源问题需要解决。在研究之前我们知道什么?获得有效、准确和最新的医疗信息对外行人来说是非常困难的。利用因特网获取医疗信息的人数正在增加。已经设计了许多工具来评估卫生信息网站的质量;其中绝大多数不能被外行实际使用。由于网址的变化,医生通常不太可能推荐其他网站,而且许多网站没有定期维护和审查。在整容手术等领域,医生可能不愿意推荐竞争对手的网站。独立的临床医生是评估医疗网站质量的最佳人选。没有必要再设计关于整容手术(或任何其他学科)的网站,因为现有的网站超过1600万个。结合消费者和临床医生的网站评估工具,设计了一个“门户”网站。这个“门户”网站可以不带任何偏见地推荐,并定期维护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing A Portal To Validated Cosmetic Surgery Information Websites
Introduction: Patients are increasingly accessing the Internet to obtain medical information. However, there have been many concerns about the difficulty in assessing the accuracy of this information. Although many website rating tools exist, the vast majority of these are unusable by consumers. Finding valid and up to date information can be very challenging and time consuming for patients. Methods: We analysed the first 200 websites are a Google search on "cosmetic surgery" using a combination of consumer and clinician based website rating tools. After identifying the "top scoring" websites we designed a "gateway" website and used these sites as links. Results: Eighty-nine percent of the websites did not meet the standard as described by the website rating tools. We also describe the method of design of the "gateway" website. Conclusions: Patients need to be better informed about the difficulty in obtaining accurate, valid information on the Internet. By directing patients to validated websites, clinicians can ease this problem. There are several resource issues that need to be addressed in order to maintain a website. WHAT WAS KNOWN BEFORE THE STUDY? Obtaining valid, accurate and up to date medical information is very difficult for the layperson. The usage of the Internet to obtain medical information is on the rise. There have been many instruments designed to assess the quality of health information websites; the vast majority of these cannot be used practically by laypersons. Physicians are often unlikely to recommend other websites as URL's change and many sites are not maintained and reviewed regularly. In disciplines such as cosmetic surgery, physicians may be reluctant to recommend a competitor's website. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS Independent clinicians are best placed to assess the quality of medical websites. There is no need to design anymore websites on cosmetic surgery (or any other discipline) as there are over 16 million in existence. Using a combination of consumer and clinician based website assessment tools a “gateway” website has been designed. This “gateway” site can be recommended without any prejudice and is regularly maintained.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信