有源电力滤波中滞回与死拍控制器性能的比较

2012 IEEE Third International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies (ICSET) Pub Date : 2012-11-26 DOI:10.1109/ICSET.2012.6357413

R. Panigrahi, P. C. Panda, B. Subudhi

{"title":"有源电力滤波中滞回与死拍控制器性能的比较","authors":"R. Panigrahi, P. C. Panda, B. Subudhi","doi":"10.1109/ICSET.2012.6357413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A comparative evaluation of the performances of two current control techniques namely dead beat controller and hysteresis current controller is presented in this paper. A discrete Kalman Filter is used for reference current estimation for compensating delays occurring due to digital signal processing. In order to test the effectiveness of these two controllers, simulation has been carried out considering single phase SAPF (Shunt Active Power Filter) using MATLAB. From the obtained results, it is observed that the hysteresis controller outperforms the dead beat controller in terms of exhibiting fast transient response and computational simplicity.","PeriodicalId":256740,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE Third International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies (ICSET)","volume":"84 10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of performances of hysteresis and dead beat controllers in active power filtering\",\"authors\":\"R. Panigrahi, P. C. Panda, B. Subudhi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSET.2012.6357413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A comparative evaluation of the performances of two current control techniques namely dead beat controller and hysteresis current controller is presented in this paper. A discrete Kalman Filter is used for reference current estimation for compensating delays occurring due to digital signal processing. In order to test the effectiveness of these two controllers, simulation has been carried out considering single phase SAPF (Shunt Active Power Filter) using MATLAB. From the obtained results, it is observed that the hysteresis controller outperforms the dead beat controller in terms of exhibiting fast transient response and computational simplicity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 IEEE Third International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies (ICSET)\",\"volume\":\"84 10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 IEEE Third International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies (ICSET)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSET.2012.6357413\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE Third International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies (ICSET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSET.2012.6357413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

摘要

本文对恒拍控制器和滞后电流控制器两种电流控制技术的性能进行了比较评价。采用离散卡尔曼滤波器进行基准电流估计，以补偿由于数字信号处理而产生的延迟。为了验证这两种控制器的有效性，利用MATLAB对单相并联有源电力滤波器进行了仿真。从得到的结果可以看出，迟滞控制器在瞬态响应快和计算简单方面优于死拍控制器。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Comparison of performances of hysteresis and dead beat controllers in active power filtering

A comparative evaluation of the performances of two current control techniques namely dead beat controller and hysteresis current controller is presented in this paper. A discrete Kalman Filter is used for reference current estimation for compensating delays occurring due to digital signal processing. In order to test the effectiveness of these two controllers, simulation has been carried out considering single phase SAPF (Shunt Active Power Filter) using MATLAB. From the obtained results, it is observed that the hysteresis controller outperforms the dead beat controller in terms of exhibiting fast transient response and computational simplicity.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

2012 IEEE Third International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies (ICSET)

自引率

0.00%

发文量