{"title":"科尔宾领导的政府是否对英国犹太人的生活构成了“生存威胁”?革命国家和犹太社区的毁灭","authors":"Jack Staples-Butler","doi":"10.26613/jca/3.1.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a united front-page statement issued on July 25, 2018, Britain’s three largest Jewish newspapers claimed that a Labour government led by Jeremy Corbyn would pose an “existential threat to Jewish life in this country.”1 On September 2, 2018, this unprecedented claim was echoed by Jonathan Sacks, former Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth.2 On August 1, 2019, the UK Equalities and Human Rights Commission or EHRC announced a formal investigation into allegations of antisemitism in the Labour Party under its statutory enforcement powers. On November 26, 2019, a Times article by Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis accused Corbyn of having “sanctioned” antisemitism “from the very top”, claimed that “the vast majority of Jews [were] gripped by anxiety” at the prospect of a Labour victory, and adjudged Corbyn himself to be “unfit for high office”.3 On December 5, 2019, a dossier of evidence compiled for the EHRC by the Labour Party’s official Jewish affiliate, the Jewish Labour Movement, was leaked to the press. Featuring sworn testimony from seventy current or former Labour Party staffers, it provided evidence that the party was “institutionally antisemitic” and that the party leadership had directly interfered in the investigation of antisemitism allegations referred to the party’s disciplinary unit.4 Abstract","PeriodicalId":283546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Antisemitism","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Did a Corbyn-Led Government Pose an “Existential Threat to Jewish Life” in the UK? Revolutionary States and the Destruction of Jewish Communities\",\"authors\":\"Jack Staples-Butler\",\"doi\":\"10.26613/jca/3.1.47\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a united front-page statement issued on July 25, 2018, Britain’s three largest Jewish newspapers claimed that a Labour government led by Jeremy Corbyn would pose an “existential threat to Jewish life in this country.”1 On September 2, 2018, this unprecedented claim was echoed by Jonathan Sacks, former Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth.2 On August 1, 2019, the UK Equalities and Human Rights Commission or EHRC announced a formal investigation into allegations of antisemitism in the Labour Party under its statutory enforcement powers. On November 26, 2019, a Times article by Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis accused Corbyn of having “sanctioned” antisemitism “from the very top”, claimed that “the vast majority of Jews [were] gripped by anxiety” at the prospect of a Labour victory, and adjudged Corbyn himself to be “unfit for high office”.3 On December 5, 2019, a dossier of evidence compiled for the EHRC by the Labour Party’s official Jewish affiliate, the Jewish Labour Movement, was leaked to the press. Featuring sworn testimony from seventy current or former Labour Party staffers, it provided evidence that the party was “institutionally antisemitic” and that the party leadership had directly interfered in the investigation of antisemitism allegations referred to the party’s disciplinary unit.4 Abstract\",\"PeriodicalId\":283546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Antisemitism\",\"volume\":\"110 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Antisemitism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26613/jca/3.1.47\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Antisemitism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26613/jca/3.1.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
2018年7月25日,英国三家最大的犹太报纸在头版发表联合声明,称杰里米·科尔宾领导的工党政府将“对英国犹太人的生存构成威胁”。1 2018年9月2日,前英国及英联邦首席拉比乔纳森·萨克斯回应了这一前所未有的说法。2 2019年8月1日,英国平等与人权委员会(EHRC)宣布,根据其法定执法权力,对工党内部的反犹太主义指控进行正式调查。2019年11月26日,英国《泰晤士报》首席拉比伊弗雷姆·米尔维斯发表文章,指责科尔宾“从最高层”“批准”了反犹主义,声称“绝大多数犹太人对工党获胜的前景感到焦虑”,并认为科尔宾本人“不适合担任高级职务”2019年12月5日,工党的官方犹太分支机构犹太劳工运动(Jewish Labour Movement)向媒体泄露了一份为EHRC编制的证据档案。它以70名现任或前任工党工作人员的宣誓证词为特色,提供了证据,证明该党是“制度上的反犹主义”,该党领导层直接干预了反犹主义指控提交给该党纪律部门的调查摘要
Did a Corbyn-Led Government Pose an “Existential Threat to Jewish Life” in the UK? Revolutionary States and the Destruction of Jewish Communities
In a united front-page statement issued on July 25, 2018, Britain’s three largest Jewish newspapers claimed that a Labour government led by Jeremy Corbyn would pose an “existential threat to Jewish life in this country.”1 On September 2, 2018, this unprecedented claim was echoed by Jonathan Sacks, former Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth.2 On August 1, 2019, the UK Equalities and Human Rights Commission or EHRC announced a formal investigation into allegations of antisemitism in the Labour Party under its statutory enforcement powers. On November 26, 2019, a Times article by Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis accused Corbyn of having “sanctioned” antisemitism “from the very top”, claimed that “the vast majority of Jews [were] gripped by anxiety” at the prospect of a Labour victory, and adjudged Corbyn himself to be “unfit for high office”.3 On December 5, 2019, a dossier of evidence compiled for the EHRC by the Labour Party’s official Jewish affiliate, the Jewish Labour Movement, was leaked to the press. Featuring sworn testimony from seventy current or former Labour Party staffers, it provided evidence that the party was “institutionally antisemitic” and that the party leadership had directly interfered in the investigation of antisemitism allegations referred to the party’s disciplinary unit.4 Abstract