{"title":"关于多值决策图的大小问题","authors":"D. M. Miller, G. Dueck","doi":"10.1109/ISMVL.2003.1201411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The worst-case number of nodes is considered for decision diagrams for general and totally-symmetric multiple-valued functions. We present upper bounds on the number of nodes and then show the bounds are exact by showing how to construct decision diagram of that size. We also show that cyclic edge negations do not reduce the worst case size as much as might be anticipated. Finally, we show that functions exist which have exponential size with respect to one radix, but have linear size with respect to a different radix.","PeriodicalId":434515,"journal":{"name":"33rd International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic, 2003. Proceedings.","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the size of multiple-valued decision diagrams\",\"authors\":\"D. M. Miller, G. Dueck\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISMVL.2003.1201411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The worst-case number of nodes is considered for decision diagrams for general and totally-symmetric multiple-valued functions. We present upper bounds on the number of nodes and then show the bounds are exact by showing how to construct decision diagram of that size. We also show that cyclic edge negations do not reduce the worst case size as much as might be anticipated. Finally, we show that functions exist which have exponential size with respect to one radix, but have linear size with respect to a different radix.\",\"PeriodicalId\":434515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"33rd International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic, 2003. Proceedings.\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"33rd International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic, 2003. Proceedings.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMVL.2003.1201411\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"33rd International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic, 2003. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMVL.2003.1201411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The worst-case number of nodes is considered for decision diagrams for general and totally-symmetric multiple-valued functions. We present upper bounds on the number of nodes and then show the bounds are exact by showing how to construct decision diagram of that size. We also show that cyclic edge negations do not reduce the worst case size as much as might be anticipated. Finally, we show that functions exist which have exponential size with respect to one radix, but have linear size with respect to a different radix.