{"title":"风险归因的陷阱","authors":"B. Davis, J. Menchero","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1823628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While performance analysis is typically conducted on a benchmark-relative basis, risk analysis is often presented on an absolute-return basis. This mismatch between sources of risk and return leads to the pitfall that active management decisions cannot be evaluated on a risk-adjusted basis. In particular, usage of absolute return sources in risk attribution may lead to non-intuitive marginal contributions to risk and flagging aggressive positions as risk reducing. These pitfalls can be addressed by using relative MCARs, which result in a set of consistent and intuitive effects across securities, sectors, and factors.","PeriodicalId":335960,"journal":{"name":"MSCI Research Paper Series","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pitfalls in Risk Attribution\",\"authors\":\"B. Davis, J. Menchero\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1823628\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While performance analysis is typically conducted on a benchmark-relative basis, risk analysis is often presented on an absolute-return basis. This mismatch between sources of risk and return leads to the pitfall that active management decisions cannot be evaluated on a risk-adjusted basis. In particular, usage of absolute return sources in risk attribution may lead to non-intuitive marginal contributions to risk and flagging aggressive positions as risk reducing. These pitfalls can be addressed by using relative MCARs, which result in a set of consistent and intuitive effects across securities, sectors, and factors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":335960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MSCI Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MSCI Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1823628\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MSCI Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1823628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
While performance analysis is typically conducted on a benchmark-relative basis, risk analysis is often presented on an absolute-return basis. This mismatch between sources of risk and return leads to the pitfall that active management decisions cannot be evaluated on a risk-adjusted basis. In particular, usage of absolute return sources in risk attribution may lead to non-intuitive marginal contributions to risk and flagging aggressive positions as risk reducing. These pitfalls can be addressed by using relative MCARs, which result in a set of consistent and intuitive effects across securities, sectors, and factors.