一种语义科学的表示框架

S. Mobasheri, M. Shamsfard
{"title":"一种语义科学的表示框架","authors":"S. Mobasheri, M. Shamsfard","doi":"10.1109/ICWR.2017.7959299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work addresses the problem of enabling machines to perform scientific tasks, e.g. reasoning based on scientific laws and definitions, recognizing inter-dependence of scientific domains, and answering queries about science corpus. The building blocks of science, such as scientific terms, laws, problems, solutions, theories and disciplines are traditionally represented as single, atomic nodes in scientific ontologies. This makes it difficult to distinguish those constituents and use them properly in the automation of scientific activities. We support the idea of adding structure to the representation of different constituents of science corpus. The structure of a scientific law, for instance, would be different from that of a solution to a given scientific problem. It is shown through examples that considering those different structures can help in reasoning about scientific knowledge. Moreover, the domain- independent aspects of different constituents of science have the potential to be factored out in a meta-ontology. This meta-science can also contain general reasoning machinery about science.","PeriodicalId":304897,"journal":{"name":"2017 3th International Conference on Web Research (ICWR)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A proposed representation framework for semantic science\",\"authors\":\"S. Mobasheri, M. Shamsfard\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICWR.2017.7959299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work addresses the problem of enabling machines to perform scientific tasks, e.g. reasoning based on scientific laws and definitions, recognizing inter-dependence of scientific domains, and answering queries about science corpus. The building blocks of science, such as scientific terms, laws, problems, solutions, theories and disciplines are traditionally represented as single, atomic nodes in scientific ontologies. This makes it difficult to distinguish those constituents and use them properly in the automation of scientific activities. We support the idea of adding structure to the representation of different constituents of science corpus. The structure of a scientific law, for instance, would be different from that of a solution to a given scientific problem. It is shown through examples that considering those different structures can help in reasoning about scientific knowledge. Moreover, the domain- independent aspects of different constituents of science have the potential to be factored out in a meta-ontology. This meta-science can also contain general reasoning machinery about science.\",\"PeriodicalId\":304897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 3th International Conference on Web Research (ICWR)\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 3th International Conference on Web Research (ICWR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICWR.2017.7959299\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 3th International Conference on Web Research (ICWR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICWR.2017.7959299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作解决了使机器能够执行科学任务的问题,例如基于科学定律和定义的推理,识别科学领域的相互依赖性,以及回答关于科学语料库的查询。科学的组成部分,如科学术语、定律、问题、解决方案、理论和学科,传统上被表示为科学本体中的单个原子节点。这使得在科学活动的自动化中很难区分这些成分并正确地使用它们。我们支持为科学语料库的不同成分的表示添加结构的想法。例如,一个科学定律的结构将不同于一个给定科学问题的解决方案。通过实例表明,考虑这些不同的结构有助于对科学知识进行推理。此外,科学的不同组成部分的领域独立方面有可能在元本体中被分解出来。这种元科学也可以包含关于科学的一般推理机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A proposed representation framework for semantic science
This work addresses the problem of enabling machines to perform scientific tasks, e.g. reasoning based on scientific laws and definitions, recognizing inter-dependence of scientific domains, and answering queries about science corpus. The building blocks of science, such as scientific terms, laws, problems, solutions, theories and disciplines are traditionally represented as single, atomic nodes in scientific ontologies. This makes it difficult to distinguish those constituents and use them properly in the automation of scientific activities. We support the idea of adding structure to the representation of different constituents of science corpus. The structure of a scientific law, for instance, would be different from that of a solution to a given scientific problem. It is shown through examples that considering those different structures can help in reasoning about scientific knowledge. Moreover, the domain- independent aspects of different constituents of science have the potential to be factored out in a meta-ontology. This meta-science can also contain general reasoning machinery about science.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信