从医学图像分割的角度比较仿生算法

G. Wachs-Lopes, Fernanda S. Beltrame, R. M. Santos, P. Rodrigues
{"title":"从医学图像分割的角度比较仿生算法","authors":"G. Wachs-Lopes, Fernanda S. Beltrame, R. M. Santos, P. Rodrigues","doi":"10.1109/IWOBI.2018.8464218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As new technological challenges depending on the computational performance of bio-inspired algorithms emerge, the demand for more efficient heuristic solutions grows up at same rate. Specifically, the medical field is one of the most challenging, due to the fact of the pre-processing steps, such as multilevel segmentation of color spaces, require greater precision. Thus, many algorithms inspired by natural behavior have emerged successfully aiming to find approximate solutions compatible with optimal ones, but with much higher performance in terms of computational time. Although they perform well, some of these newer algorithms have not yet been analyzed from their practical applicability in one or more medical databases. This paper presents a comparative study from a practical point of view of three of these new algorithms: Cuckoo Search (CS), KH (Krill Herd) and EHO (Elephant Herd Optimization). Our results suggest that these three algorithms are compatible in terms of performance in medical databases, but with EHO showing the best performance among all three.","PeriodicalId":127078,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Work Conference on Bioinspired Intelligence (IWOBI)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Bio-Inspired Algorithms From The Point of View of Medical Image Segmentation\",\"authors\":\"G. Wachs-Lopes, Fernanda S. Beltrame, R. M. Santos, P. Rodrigues\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IWOBI.2018.8464218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As new technological challenges depending on the computational performance of bio-inspired algorithms emerge, the demand for more efficient heuristic solutions grows up at same rate. Specifically, the medical field is one of the most challenging, due to the fact of the pre-processing steps, such as multilevel segmentation of color spaces, require greater precision. Thus, many algorithms inspired by natural behavior have emerged successfully aiming to find approximate solutions compatible with optimal ones, but with much higher performance in terms of computational time. Although they perform well, some of these newer algorithms have not yet been analyzed from their practical applicability in one or more medical databases. This paper presents a comparative study from a practical point of view of three of these new algorithms: Cuckoo Search (CS), KH (Krill Herd) and EHO (Elephant Herd Optimization). Our results suggest that these three algorithms are compatible in terms of performance in medical databases, but with EHO showing the best performance among all three.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE International Work Conference on Bioinspired Intelligence (IWOBI)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE International Work Conference on Bioinspired Intelligence (IWOBI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWOBI.2018.8464218\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Work Conference on Bioinspired Intelligence (IWOBI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWOBI.2018.8464218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

随着依赖于生物启发算法计算性能的新技术挑战的出现,对更有效的启发式解决方案的需求也以同样的速度增长。具体来说,医疗领域是最具挑战性的领域之一,因为预处理步骤,如色彩空间的多级分割,需要更高的精度。因此,许多受自然行为启发的算法已经成功地出现,旨在找到与最优解兼容的近似解,但在计算时间方面具有更高的性能。虽然它们表现良好,但其中一些较新的算法尚未从它们在一个或多个医学数据库中的实际适用性进行分析。本文从实践的角度对布谷鸟搜索算法(CS)、磷虾群算法(KH)和象群优化算法(EHO)进行了比较研究。我们的研究结果表明,这三种算法在医学数据库中的性能是兼容的,但EHO在三者中表现最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Bio-Inspired Algorithms From The Point of View of Medical Image Segmentation
As new technological challenges depending on the computational performance of bio-inspired algorithms emerge, the demand for more efficient heuristic solutions grows up at same rate. Specifically, the medical field is one of the most challenging, due to the fact of the pre-processing steps, such as multilevel segmentation of color spaces, require greater precision. Thus, many algorithms inspired by natural behavior have emerged successfully aiming to find approximate solutions compatible with optimal ones, but with much higher performance in terms of computational time. Although they perform well, some of these newer algorithms have not yet been analyzed from their practical applicability in one or more medical databases. This paper presents a comparative study from a practical point of view of three of these new algorithms: Cuckoo Search (CS), KH (Krill Herd) and EHO (Elephant Herd Optimization). Our results suggest that these three algorithms are compatible in terms of performance in medical databases, but with EHO showing the best performance among all three.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信