{"title":"是否存在“地不平等法”","authors":"Wang Wei","doi":"10.4324/9781315727905-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper tries to argue:(1)CP clauses,which may include infinite conditions,could be ineliminable even with scientific terminology.(2)We can test the contraposition of a CP law,therefore the law itself.(3)Earman's account of differential equations may violate his Mill-Ramsey-Lewis view of laws of nature.So differential equations of the evolution type could be laws as well.The author also raise a thought experiment,which illustrates Earman's diction between conditions for the truth of a law and conditions for the validity of its application may be inconsistent with Earman's supervenience thesis.","PeriodicalId":430263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dialectics of Nature","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is There Such Thing as A Ceteris Paribus Law\",\"authors\":\"Wang Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315727905-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper tries to argue:(1)CP clauses,which may include infinite conditions,could be ineliminable even with scientific terminology.(2)We can test the contraposition of a CP law,therefore the law itself.(3)Earman's account of differential equations may violate his Mill-Ramsey-Lewis view of laws of nature.So differential equations of the evolution type could be laws as well.The author also raise a thought experiment,which illustrates Earman's diction between conditions for the truth of a law and conditions for the validity of its application may be inconsistent with Earman's supervenience thesis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dialectics of Nature\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dialectics of Nature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315727905-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dialectics of Nature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315727905-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The paper tries to argue:(1)CP clauses,which may include infinite conditions,could be ineliminable even with scientific terminology.(2)We can test the contraposition of a CP law,therefore the law itself.(3)Earman's account of differential equations may violate his Mill-Ramsey-Lewis view of laws of nature.So differential equations of the evolution type could be laws as well.The author also raise a thought experiment,which illustrates Earman's diction between conditions for the truth of a law and conditions for the validity of its application may be inconsistent with Earman's supervenience thesis.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
