大流行的逻辑-本体论方面

Aleksandar Lukić
{"title":"大流行的逻辑-本体论方面","authors":"Aleksandar Lukić","doi":"10.2298/theo2204169l","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the author examines the logical and ontological aspects of\n pandemic. Relatedly, the the definition of a pandemic is scrutinized. The\n very word pandemic (????????) comes from the Classical Greek language and\n refers to something pertains to all (???) people (?????). However, this\n cannot be of great use for the definition of pandemic, because with each one\n known so far, it was about a wide distribution in the people, and not about\n the entire people. We will try to show that a precise definition (or precise\n description) of the pandemic does not exist, which means that the very\n notion is not clear, and therefore the declaration of a pandemic is a matter\n of preference of those who declare it. ?Wide distribution? is a wide notion\n that could be a part of acceptable scientific definition. Such a lack is,\n however, compensated by the frequent use of emotional determinants that only\n obscure the problem, instead of illuminating it. Expressions such as:\n ?invisible enemy?, ?social distancing?, ?new normal?, ?responsibility?,\n ?solidarity?, ?state of war?, ?virus attack? and others, have an emotional\n function, the goal of which is to replace the scientific, rational\n understanding of things.","PeriodicalId":374875,"journal":{"name":"Theoria, Beograd","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Logico-ontological aspects of the pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Aleksandar Lukić\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/theo2204169l\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, the author examines the logical and ontological aspects of\\n pandemic. Relatedly, the the definition of a pandemic is scrutinized. The\\n very word pandemic (????????) comes from the Classical Greek language and\\n refers to something pertains to all (???) people (?????). However, this\\n cannot be of great use for the definition of pandemic, because with each one\\n known so far, it was about a wide distribution in the people, and not about\\n the entire people. We will try to show that a precise definition (or precise\\n description) of the pandemic does not exist, which means that the very\\n notion is not clear, and therefore the declaration of a pandemic is a matter\\n of preference of those who declare it. ?Wide distribution? is a wide notion\\n that could be a part of acceptable scientific definition. Such a lack is,\\n however, compensated by the frequent use of emotional determinants that only\\n obscure the problem, instead of illuminating it. Expressions such as:\\n ?invisible enemy?, ?social distancing?, ?new normal?, ?responsibility?,\\n ?solidarity?, ?state of war?, ?virus attack? and others, have an emotional\\n function, the goal of which is to replace the scientific, rational\\n understanding of things.\",\"PeriodicalId\":374875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theoria, Beograd\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theoria, Beograd\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/theo2204169l\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoria, Beograd","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/theo2204169l","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,作者考察了流行病的逻辑和本体论方面。与此相关的是,对大流行的定义进行了仔细审查。单词pandemic(????????)来自古希腊语,指的是与所有人(???)有关的东西(?????)。然而,这对大流行的定义没有多大用处,因为迄今为止已知的每一种疾病都是关于在人群中的广泛分布,而不是关于全体人民。我们将努力表明,不存在对大流行病的精确定义(或精确描述),这意味着这个概念本身并不明确,因此,宣布大流行病是宣布大流行病者的偏好问题。广泛的分布?是一个广泛的概念,可以成为可接受的科学定义的一部分。然而,这种缺失被频繁使用的情感决定因素所弥补,这些因素只会模糊问题,而不是阐明问题。例如:?看不见的敌人?保持社交距离?新常态?责任?,团结?战争状态?病毒攻击?而另一些,则具有情感功能,其目标是取代对事物的科学、理性的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Logico-ontological aspects of the pandemic
In this paper, the author examines the logical and ontological aspects of pandemic. Relatedly, the the definition of a pandemic is scrutinized. The very word pandemic (????????) comes from the Classical Greek language and refers to something pertains to all (???) people (?????). However, this cannot be of great use for the definition of pandemic, because with each one known so far, it was about a wide distribution in the people, and not about the entire people. We will try to show that a precise definition (or precise description) of the pandemic does not exist, which means that the very notion is not clear, and therefore the declaration of a pandemic is a matter of preference of those who declare it. ?Wide distribution? is a wide notion that could be a part of acceptable scientific definition. Such a lack is, however, compensated by the frequent use of emotional determinants that only obscure the problem, instead of illuminating it. Expressions such as: ?invisible enemy?, ?social distancing?, ?new normal?, ?responsibility?, ?solidarity?, ?state of war?, ?virus attack? and others, have an emotional function, the goal of which is to replace the scientific, rational understanding of things.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信