利用经验数据评估室内外混合场景下不同的信号传播模型

O. Artemenko, Alina Rubina, A. Nayak, Sanjeeth Baptist Menezes, A. Mitschele-Thiel
{"title":"利用经验数据评估室内外混合场景下不同的信号传播模型","authors":"O. Artemenko, Alina Rubina, A. Nayak, Sanjeeth Baptist Menezes, A. Mitschele-Thiel","doi":"10.4108/eai.20-6-2016.151519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we are choosing a suitable indoor-outdoor propagation model out of the existing models by considering path loss and distance as parameters. Path loss is calculated empirically by placing emitter nodes inside a building. A receiver placed outdoors is represented by a Quadrocopter (QC) that receives beacon messages from indoor nodes. As per our analysis, Stanford University Interim (SUI) model, COST-231 Hata model, Green-Obaidat model, Free Space model, Log-Distance Path Loss model and Electronic Communication Committee 33 (ECC-33) models are chosen and evaluated using empirical data collected in a real environment. The aim is to determine if the analytically chosen models fit our scenario by estimating the minimal standard deviation from the empirical data.","PeriodicalId":299985,"journal":{"name":"EAI Endorsed Trans. Mob. Commun. Appl.","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of different signal propagation models for a mixed indoor-outdoor scenario using empirical data\",\"authors\":\"O. Artemenko, Alina Rubina, A. Nayak, Sanjeeth Baptist Menezes, A. Mitschele-Thiel\",\"doi\":\"10.4108/eai.20-6-2016.151519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we are choosing a suitable indoor-outdoor propagation model out of the existing models by considering path loss and distance as parameters. Path loss is calculated empirically by placing emitter nodes inside a building. A receiver placed outdoors is represented by a Quadrocopter (QC) that receives beacon messages from indoor nodes. As per our analysis, Stanford University Interim (SUI) model, COST-231 Hata model, Green-Obaidat model, Free Space model, Log-Distance Path Loss model and Electronic Communication Committee 33 (ECC-33) models are chosen and evaluated using empirical data collected in a real environment. The aim is to determine if the analytically chosen models fit our scenario by estimating the minimal standard deviation from the empirical data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":299985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EAI Endorsed Trans. Mob. Commun. Appl.\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EAI Endorsed Trans. Mob. Commun. Appl.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.20-6-2016.151519\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EAI Endorsed Trans. Mob. Commun. Appl.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.20-6-2016.151519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

本文以路径损耗和距离为参数,从已有的模型中选择合适的室内外传播模型。通过在建筑物内放置发射器节点来计算路径损耗。放置在室外的接收器由一架四旋翼飞行器(QC)表示,该飞行器接收来自室内节点的信标消息。本文选取了Stanford University Interim (SUI)模型、COST-231 Hata模型、Green-Obaidat模型、Free Space模型、Log-Distance Path Loss模型和Electronic Communication Committee 33 (ECC-33)模型,并利用在真实环境中收集的经验数据对模型进行了评价。目的是通过估计经验数据的最小标准偏差来确定分析选择的模型是否适合我们的场景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of different signal propagation models for a mixed indoor-outdoor scenario using empirical data
In this paper, we are choosing a suitable indoor-outdoor propagation model out of the existing models by considering path loss and distance as parameters. Path loss is calculated empirically by placing emitter nodes inside a building. A receiver placed outdoors is represented by a Quadrocopter (QC) that receives beacon messages from indoor nodes. As per our analysis, Stanford University Interim (SUI) model, COST-231 Hata model, Green-Obaidat model, Free Space model, Log-Distance Path Loss model and Electronic Communication Committee 33 (ECC-33) models are chosen and evaluated using empirical data collected in a real environment. The aim is to determine if the analytically chosen models fit our scenario by estimating the minimal standard deviation from the empirical data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信