O. Artemenko, Alina Rubina, A. Nayak, Sanjeeth Baptist Menezes, A. Mitschele-Thiel
{"title":"利用经验数据评估室内外混合场景下不同的信号传播模型","authors":"O. Artemenko, Alina Rubina, A. Nayak, Sanjeeth Baptist Menezes, A. Mitschele-Thiel","doi":"10.4108/eai.20-6-2016.151519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we are choosing a suitable indoor-outdoor propagation model out of the existing models by considering path loss and distance as parameters. Path loss is calculated empirically by placing emitter nodes inside a building. A receiver placed outdoors is represented by a Quadrocopter (QC) that receives beacon messages from indoor nodes. As per our analysis, Stanford University Interim (SUI) model, COST-231 Hata model, Green-Obaidat model, Free Space model, Log-Distance Path Loss model and Electronic Communication Committee 33 (ECC-33) models are chosen and evaluated using empirical data collected in a real environment. The aim is to determine if the analytically chosen models fit our scenario by estimating the minimal standard deviation from the empirical data.","PeriodicalId":299985,"journal":{"name":"EAI Endorsed Trans. Mob. Commun. Appl.","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of different signal propagation models for a mixed indoor-outdoor scenario using empirical data\",\"authors\":\"O. Artemenko, Alina Rubina, A. Nayak, Sanjeeth Baptist Menezes, A. Mitschele-Thiel\",\"doi\":\"10.4108/eai.20-6-2016.151519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we are choosing a suitable indoor-outdoor propagation model out of the existing models by considering path loss and distance as parameters. Path loss is calculated empirically by placing emitter nodes inside a building. A receiver placed outdoors is represented by a Quadrocopter (QC) that receives beacon messages from indoor nodes. As per our analysis, Stanford University Interim (SUI) model, COST-231 Hata model, Green-Obaidat model, Free Space model, Log-Distance Path Loss model and Electronic Communication Committee 33 (ECC-33) models are chosen and evaluated using empirical data collected in a real environment. The aim is to determine if the analytically chosen models fit our scenario by estimating the minimal standard deviation from the empirical data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":299985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EAI Endorsed Trans. Mob. Commun. Appl.\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EAI Endorsed Trans. Mob. Commun. Appl.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.20-6-2016.151519\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EAI Endorsed Trans. Mob. Commun. Appl.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.20-6-2016.151519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
摘要
本文以路径损耗和距离为参数,从已有的模型中选择合适的室内外传播模型。通过在建筑物内放置发射器节点来计算路径损耗。放置在室外的接收器由一架四旋翼飞行器(QC)表示,该飞行器接收来自室内节点的信标消息。本文选取了Stanford University Interim (SUI)模型、COST-231 Hata模型、Green-Obaidat模型、Free Space模型、Log-Distance Path Loss模型和Electronic Communication Committee 33 (ECC-33)模型,并利用在真实环境中收集的经验数据对模型进行了评价。目的是通过估计经验数据的最小标准偏差来确定分析选择的模型是否适合我们的场景。
Evaluation of different signal propagation models for a mixed indoor-outdoor scenario using empirical data
In this paper, we are choosing a suitable indoor-outdoor propagation model out of the existing models by considering path loss and distance as parameters. Path loss is calculated empirically by placing emitter nodes inside a building. A receiver placed outdoors is represented by a Quadrocopter (QC) that receives beacon messages from indoor nodes. As per our analysis, Stanford University Interim (SUI) model, COST-231 Hata model, Green-Obaidat model, Free Space model, Log-Distance Path Loss model and Electronic Communication Committee 33 (ECC-33) models are chosen and evaluated using empirical data collected in a real environment. The aim is to determine if the analytically chosen models fit our scenario by estimating the minimal standard deviation from the empirical data.