与传统的基于眼睛的输入仿真相比,评估视线适应界面的可用性

C. Kumar, Raphael Menges, Steffen Staab
{"title":"与传统的基于眼睛的输入仿真相比,评估视线适应界面的可用性","authors":"C. Kumar, Raphael Menges, Steffen Staab","doi":"10.1109/CBMS.2017.155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, eye tracking systems have greatly improved, beginning to play a promising role as an input medium. Eye trackers can be used for application control either by simply emulating the mouse and keyboard devices in the traditional graphical user interface, or by customized interfaces for eye gaze events. In this work, we evaluate these two approaches to assess their impact in usability. We present a gaze-adapted Twitter application interface with direct interaction of eye gaze input, and compare it to Twitter in a conventional browser interface with gaze-based mouse and keyboard emulation. We conducted an experimental study, which indicates a significantly better subjective user experience for the gaze-adapted approach. Based on the results, we argue the need of user interfaces interacting directly to eye gaze input to provide an improved user experience, more specifically in the field of accessibility.","PeriodicalId":141105,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Usability of Gaze-Adapted Interface against Conventional Eye-Based Input Emulation\",\"authors\":\"C. Kumar, Raphael Menges, Steffen Staab\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CBMS.2017.155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, eye tracking systems have greatly improved, beginning to play a promising role as an input medium. Eye trackers can be used for application control either by simply emulating the mouse and keyboard devices in the traditional graphical user interface, or by customized interfaces for eye gaze events. In this work, we evaluate these two approaches to assess their impact in usability. We present a gaze-adapted Twitter application interface with direct interaction of eye gaze input, and compare it to Twitter in a conventional browser interface with gaze-based mouse and keyboard emulation. We conducted an experimental study, which indicates a significantly better subjective user experience for the gaze-adapted approach. Based on the results, we argue the need of user interfaces interacting directly to eye gaze input to provide an improved user experience, more specifically in the field of accessibility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":141105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.2017.155\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.2017.155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

近年来,眼动追踪系统有了很大的改进,作为一种输入媒介开始发挥很有前景的作用。眼动仪可以通过简单地模拟传统图形用户界面中的鼠标和键盘设备来控制应用程序,也可以通过人眼注视事件的定制界面来控制应用程序。在这项工作中,我们评估了这两种方法,以评估它们对可用性的影响。我们提出了一个直接与眼睛凝视输入交互的适应凝视的Twitter应用程序界面,并将其与基于凝视的鼠标和键盘仿真的传统浏览器界面中的Twitter进行了比较。我们进行了一项实验研究,结果表明,视线适应方法的主观用户体验明显更好。基于这些结果,我们认为用户界面需要直接与眼睛注视输入交互,以提供更好的用户体验,更具体地说,在可访问性领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the Usability of Gaze-Adapted Interface against Conventional Eye-Based Input Emulation
In recent years, eye tracking systems have greatly improved, beginning to play a promising role as an input medium. Eye trackers can be used for application control either by simply emulating the mouse and keyboard devices in the traditional graphical user interface, or by customized interfaces for eye gaze events. In this work, we evaluate these two approaches to assess their impact in usability. We present a gaze-adapted Twitter application interface with direct interaction of eye gaze input, and compare it to Twitter in a conventional browser interface with gaze-based mouse and keyboard emulation. We conducted an experimental study, which indicates a significantly better subjective user experience for the gaze-adapted approach. Based on the results, we argue the need of user interfaces interacting directly to eye gaze input to provide an improved user experience, more specifically in the field of accessibility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信