最近最不常用的替换策略命名为数据联网方法

Made Adi Paramartha Putra, H. Situmorang, N. Syambas
{"title":"最近最不常用的替换策略命名为数据联网方法","authors":"Made Adi Paramartha Putra, H. Situmorang, N. Syambas","doi":"10.1109/ICEEI47359.2019.8988828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Named Data Networking (NDN) is a new paradigm of a network by using Content-Centric Network (CCN) theory. NDN provides better network performance since the caching policy of the NDN router saving the content requested by the user and make it accessible by another user. The current popular replacing policy that adopted from TCP/IP network is Least Recently Used (LRU) and Least Frequency Used (LFU). However, in a low condition of cache size, both algorithms not powerful yet. In this paper, we evaluate replacement policy in NDN using Least Recently/Frequency Used (LRFU) compared with LRU algorithm. Moreover, our approach based on C++ programming language to simulate the LRFU caching policy in Named Data Networking. Overall results shows that LRFU replacement policy in NDN provides higher hit rate and lower miss rate. Based on 20000 generated interest, LRFU replacement policy achieve 3578 average hit which is 18.398% greater than LRU with average hit 3022. Based on miss rate LRFU replacement policy achieve 16391 miss rate which is 3.28% lower than LRU with 16948 miss rate.","PeriodicalId":236517,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICEEI)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Least Recently Frequently Used Replacement Policy Named Data Networking Approach\",\"authors\":\"Made Adi Paramartha Putra, H. Situmorang, N. Syambas\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICEEI47359.2019.8988828\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Named Data Networking (NDN) is a new paradigm of a network by using Content-Centric Network (CCN) theory. NDN provides better network performance since the caching policy of the NDN router saving the content requested by the user and make it accessible by another user. The current popular replacing policy that adopted from TCP/IP network is Least Recently Used (LRU) and Least Frequency Used (LFU). However, in a low condition of cache size, both algorithms not powerful yet. In this paper, we evaluate replacement policy in NDN using Least Recently/Frequency Used (LRFU) compared with LRU algorithm. Moreover, our approach based on C++ programming language to simulate the LRFU caching policy in Named Data Networking. Overall results shows that LRFU replacement policy in NDN provides higher hit rate and lower miss rate. Based on 20000 generated interest, LRFU replacement policy achieve 3578 average hit which is 18.398% greater than LRU with average hit 3022. Based on miss rate LRFU replacement policy achieve 16391 miss rate which is 3.28% lower than LRU with 16948 miss rate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":236517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICEEI)\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICEEI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEI47359.2019.8988828\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICEEI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEI47359.2019.8988828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

命名数据网络(NDN)是利用内容中心网络(CCN)理论建立的一种新的网络范式。NDN提供了更好的网络性能,因为NDN路由器的缓存策略保存了用户请求的内容,并使其可供其他用户访问。目前在TCP/IP网络中比较流行的替换策略是LRU (Least Recently Used)和LFU (Least Frequency Used)。然而,在缓存大小较低的条件下,这两种算法都不够强大。在本文中,我们用LRFU (Least Recently/Frequency Used)算法来评估NDN中的替换策略,并与LRU算法进行了比较。此外,我们的方法基于c++编程语言来模拟命名数据网络中的LRFU缓存策略。总体结果表明,NDN中LRFU替换策略具有较高的命中率和较低的脱靶率。基于2万个生成利息,LRFU置换策略平均命中3578次,比平均命中3022次的LRU高出18.398%。基于失手率LRFU替换策略实现了16391次失手率,比LRU的16948次失手率低3.28%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Least Recently Frequently Used Replacement Policy Named Data Networking Approach
Named Data Networking (NDN) is a new paradigm of a network by using Content-Centric Network (CCN) theory. NDN provides better network performance since the caching policy of the NDN router saving the content requested by the user and make it accessible by another user. The current popular replacing policy that adopted from TCP/IP network is Least Recently Used (LRU) and Least Frequency Used (LFU). However, in a low condition of cache size, both algorithms not powerful yet. In this paper, we evaluate replacement policy in NDN using Least Recently/Frequency Used (LRFU) compared with LRU algorithm. Moreover, our approach based on C++ programming language to simulate the LRFU caching policy in Named Data Networking. Overall results shows that LRFU replacement policy in NDN provides higher hit rate and lower miss rate. Based on 20000 generated interest, LRFU replacement policy achieve 3578 average hit which is 18.398% greater than LRU with average hit 3022. Based on miss rate LRFU replacement policy achieve 16391 miss rate which is 3.28% lower than LRU with 16948 miss rate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信