机器学习的需求工程:一个系统的映射研究

Hugo Villamizar, Tatiana Escovedo, Marcos Kalinowski
{"title":"机器学习的需求工程:一个系统的映射研究","authors":"Hugo Villamizar, Tatiana Escovedo, Marcos Kalinowski","doi":"10.1109/SEAA53835.2021.00013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Machine learning (ML) has become a core feature for today’s real-world applications, making it a trending topic for the software engineering community. Requirements Engineering (RE) is no stranger to this and its main conferences have included workshops aiming at discussing RE in the context of ML. However, current research on the intersection between RE and ML mainly focuses on using ML techniques to support RE activities rather than on exploring how RE can improve the development of ML-based systems. This paper concerns a systematic mapping study aiming at characterizing the publication landscape of RE for ML-based systems, outlining research contributions and contemporary gaps for future research. In total, we identified 35 studies that met our inclusion criteria. We found several different types of contributions, in the form of analyses, approaches, checklists and guidelines, quality models, and taxonomies. We discuss gaps by mapping these contributions against the RE topics to which they were contributing and their type of empirical evaluation. We also identified quality characteristics that are particularly relevant for the ML context (e.g., data quality, explainability, fairness, safety, and transparency). Main reported challenges are related to the lack of validated RE techniques, the fragmented and incomplete understanding of NFRs for ML, and difficulties in handling customer expectations. There is a need for future research on the topic to reveal best practices and to propose and investigate approaches that are suitable to be used in practice.","PeriodicalId":435977,"journal":{"name":"2021 47th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Requirements Engineering for Machine Learning: A Systematic Mapping Study\",\"authors\":\"Hugo Villamizar, Tatiana Escovedo, Marcos Kalinowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SEAA53835.2021.00013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Machine learning (ML) has become a core feature for today’s real-world applications, making it a trending topic for the software engineering community. Requirements Engineering (RE) is no stranger to this and its main conferences have included workshops aiming at discussing RE in the context of ML. However, current research on the intersection between RE and ML mainly focuses on using ML techniques to support RE activities rather than on exploring how RE can improve the development of ML-based systems. This paper concerns a systematic mapping study aiming at characterizing the publication landscape of RE for ML-based systems, outlining research contributions and contemporary gaps for future research. In total, we identified 35 studies that met our inclusion criteria. We found several different types of contributions, in the form of analyses, approaches, checklists and guidelines, quality models, and taxonomies. We discuss gaps by mapping these contributions against the RE topics to which they were contributing and their type of empirical evaluation. We also identified quality characteristics that are particularly relevant for the ML context (e.g., data quality, explainability, fairness, safety, and transparency). Main reported challenges are related to the lack of validated RE techniques, the fragmented and incomplete understanding of NFRs for ML, and difficulties in handling customer expectations. There is a need for future research on the topic to reveal best practices and to propose and investigate approaches that are suitable to be used in practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":435977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 47th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 47th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA53835.2021.00013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 47th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA53835.2021.00013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

机器学习(ML)已经成为当今现实世界应用程序的核心功能,使其成为软件工程社区的热门话题。需求工程(RE)对此并不陌生,其主要会议包括旨在在ML背景下讨论RE的研讨会。然而,目前对RE和ML之间交叉的研究主要集中在使用ML技术来支持RE活动,而不是探索RE如何改进基于ML的系统的开发。本文对基于机器学习的系统进行了系统的测绘研究,旨在描述基于机器学习的系统的RE出版格局,概述了研究贡献和未来研究的当代差距。我们总共确定了35项符合纳入标准的研究。我们发现了几种不同类型的贡献,以分析、方法、检查表和指南、质量模型和分类法的形式。我们通过将这些贡献映射到它们所贡献的可再生能源主题及其经验评估类型来讨论差距。我们还确定了与ML上下文特别相关的质量特征(例如,数据质量、可解释性、公平性、安全性和透明度)。报告的主要挑战与缺乏经过验证的可重构技术、对ML的NFRs的碎片化和不完整的理解以及在处理客户期望方面的困难有关。未来有必要对这一主题进行研究,以揭示最佳实践,并提出和调查适合在实践中使用的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Requirements Engineering for Machine Learning: A Systematic Mapping Study
Machine learning (ML) has become a core feature for today’s real-world applications, making it a trending topic for the software engineering community. Requirements Engineering (RE) is no stranger to this and its main conferences have included workshops aiming at discussing RE in the context of ML. However, current research on the intersection between RE and ML mainly focuses on using ML techniques to support RE activities rather than on exploring how RE can improve the development of ML-based systems. This paper concerns a systematic mapping study aiming at characterizing the publication landscape of RE for ML-based systems, outlining research contributions and contemporary gaps for future research. In total, we identified 35 studies that met our inclusion criteria. We found several different types of contributions, in the form of analyses, approaches, checklists and guidelines, quality models, and taxonomies. We discuss gaps by mapping these contributions against the RE topics to which they were contributing and their type of empirical evaluation. We also identified quality characteristics that are particularly relevant for the ML context (e.g., data quality, explainability, fairness, safety, and transparency). Main reported challenges are related to the lack of validated RE techniques, the fragmented and incomplete understanding of NFRs for ML, and difficulties in handling customer expectations. There is a need for future research on the topic to reveal best practices and to propose and investigate approaches that are suitable to be used in practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信