水分胁迫对小麦基因型生长和产量的影响

Tanveer Ali Soomro, T. F. Abro, W. A. Jatoi, M. A. Sial, A. W. Baloch, K. A. Laghari, Kiran Soomro, Marina Kanwal Soomro, Muhammad Mustafa Soomro, Ali Bakhsh Soomro, Muhammad Daniyal Memon
{"title":"水分胁迫对小麦基因型生长和产量的影响","authors":"Tanveer Ali Soomro, T. F. Abro, W. A. Jatoi, M. A. Sial, A. W. Baloch, K. A. Laghari, Kiran Soomro, Marina Kanwal Soomro, Muhammad Mustafa Soomro, Ali Bakhsh Soomro, Muhammad Daniyal Memon","doi":"10.38211/joarps.2022.3.2.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Climate change is one of the major threats to wheat cultivation globally. Among abiotic stress, imposed by climate change, drought stress causes a drastic effect on yield and productivity of wheat. Based on this context, research was carried out on eight genotypes including WS-I (Water stress), WS-II, WS-III, WS-IV, WS-V, WS-VI, WS-VII and Khirman (check variety) to check the effect of water stress at the experimental field of Nuclear Institute of Agriculture, Tandojam. The experiment was laid-out in a split-plot design (SPD) with factorial arrangement having four treatments i.e., T1 (normal six irrigations), T2 (one irrigation), T3 (two irrigations) and T4 (three irrigations) and three replications during Rabi season, 2019-2020 in order to assess the response of wheat genotypes under different water regimes conditions for vegetative, yield and yield-related traits. The results of analysis of variance results showed that genotypes were significantly different for all traits except spike length (cm). Similarly, a significant difference was observed among the treatments for all the traits except harvest index (%). While genotype x treatments interaction showed a significance level for most of the yield associated traits except few characters such as days to 75% heading, grain filling period, plant height (cm), peduncle length (cm), spikelets spike-1 and grains spike-1 indicating that genotypes perform similarly over the treatment. Maximum mean performance for all the traits was recorded under T3 treatment compared to the T2 and T1. Among the genotypes, WS-1V perform best for grains spike-1, grain weight spike-1 (g), 1000-grain weight (g), grain yield plot-1 and harvest index (%) under all treatments. However, WS-III also performed consistently under T2 and T3 treatment. Thus, genotypes like WS-III and WS-IV could be preferred for growing in those areas where growers face the problem of water shortage. Also, WS-III and WS-IV can be used as donor genotypes for developing drought tolerant varieties.","PeriodicalId":197597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Plant Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Water Stress on Growth and Yield Performance of Wheat Genotypes\",\"authors\":\"Tanveer Ali Soomro, T. F. Abro, W. A. Jatoi, M. A. Sial, A. W. Baloch, K. A. Laghari, Kiran Soomro, Marina Kanwal Soomro, Muhammad Mustafa Soomro, Ali Bakhsh Soomro, Muhammad Daniyal Memon\",\"doi\":\"10.38211/joarps.2022.3.2.32\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Climate change is one of the major threats to wheat cultivation globally. Among abiotic stress, imposed by climate change, drought stress causes a drastic effect on yield and productivity of wheat. Based on this context, research was carried out on eight genotypes including WS-I (Water stress), WS-II, WS-III, WS-IV, WS-V, WS-VI, WS-VII and Khirman (check variety) to check the effect of water stress at the experimental field of Nuclear Institute of Agriculture, Tandojam. The experiment was laid-out in a split-plot design (SPD) with factorial arrangement having four treatments i.e., T1 (normal six irrigations), T2 (one irrigation), T3 (two irrigations) and T4 (three irrigations) and three replications during Rabi season, 2019-2020 in order to assess the response of wheat genotypes under different water regimes conditions for vegetative, yield and yield-related traits. The results of analysis of variance results showed that genotypes were significantly different for all traits except spike length (cm). Similarly, a significant difference was observed among the treatments for all the traits except harvest index (%). While genotype x treatments interaction showed a significance level for most of the yield associated traits except few characters such as days to 75% heading, grain filling period, plant height (cm), peduncle length (cm), spikelets spike-1 and grains spike-1 indicating that genotypes perform similarly over the treatment. Maximum mean performance for all the traits was recorded under T3 treatment compared to the T2 and T1. Among the genotypes, WS-1V perform best for grains spike-1, grain weight spike-1 (g), 1000-grain weight (g), grain yield plot-1 and harvest index (%) under all treatments. However, WS-III also performed consistently under T2 and T3 treatment. Thus, genotypes like WS-III and WS-IV could be preferred for growing in those areas where growers face the problem of water shortage. Also, WS-III and WS-IV can be used as donor genotypes for developing drought tolerant varieties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Research in Plant Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Research in Plant Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38211/joarps.2022.3.2.32\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Plant Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38211/joarps.2022.3.2.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

气候变化是全球小麦种植面临的主要威胁之一。在气候变化造成的非生物胁迫中,干旱胁迫对小麦的产量和生产力产生了巨大影响。在此背景下,在甘省农业核研究所的试验田,对WS-I(水分胁迫)、WS-II、WS-III、WS-IV、WS-V、WS-VI、WS-VII和Khirman(对照品种)8个基因型进行了研究,以检验水分胁迫的影响。为评价小麦基因型在不同水分条件下对营养、产量和产量相关性状的响应,本试验在2019-2020年拉比季采用分畦设计(SPD)和因子安排,分为T1(正常6次灌溉)、T2(1次灌溉)、T3(2次灌溉)和T4(3次灌溉)4个处理,共3个重复。方差分析结果表明,除穗长(cm)外,各性状的基因型差异均显著。除收获指数(%)外,各处理间均存在显著差异。除抽穗天数至75%、灌浆期、株高(cm)、花序梗长度(cm)、小穗穗-1和籽粒穗-1等少数性状外,基因型与不同处理间的互作均表现出显著性。与T2和T1处理相比,T3处理记录了所有性状的最大平均性能。在各基因型中,WS-1V在籽粒穗1号、粒重穗1号(g)、千粒重(g)、籽粒产量图1和收获指数(%)上表现最好。然而,WS-III在T2和T3治疗下也表现一致。因此,像WS-III和WS-IV这样的基因型可能更适合在种植者面临缺水问题的地区种植。同时,WS-III和WS-IV可作为耐旱品种的供体基因型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Water Stress on Growth and Yield Performance of Wheat Genotypes
Climate change is one of the major threats to wheat cultivation globally. Among abiotic stress, imposed by climate change, drought stress causes a drastic effect on yield and productivity of wheat. Based on this context, research was carried out on eight genotypes including WS-I (Water stress), WS-II, WS-III, WS-IV, WS-V, WS-VI, WS-VII and Khirman (check variety) to check the effect of water stress at the experimental field of Nuclear Institute of Agriculture, Tandojam. The experiment was laid-out in a split-plot design (SPD) with factorial arrangement having four treatments i.e., T1 (normal six irrigations), T2 (one irrigation), T3 (two irrigations) and T4 (three irrigations) and three replications during Rabi season, 2019-2020 in order to assess the response of wheat genotypes under different water regimes conditions for vegetative, yield and yield-related traits. The results of analysis of variance results showed that genotypes were significantly different for all traits except spike length (cm). Similarly, a significant difference was observed among the treatments for all the traits except harvest index (%). While genotype x treatments interaction showed a significance level for most of the yield associated traits except few characters such as days to 75% heading, grain filling period, plant height (cm), peduncle length (cm), spikelets spike-1 and grains spike-1 indicating that genotypes perform similarly over the treatment. Maximum mean performance for all the traits was recorded under T3 treatment compared to the T2 and T1. Among the genotypes, WS-1V perform best for grains spike-1, grain weight spike-1 (g), 1000-grain weight (g), grain yield plot-1 and harvest index (%) under all treatments. However, WS-III also performed consistently under T2 and T3 treatment. Thus, genotypes like WS-III and WS-IV could be preferred for growing in those areas where growers face the problem of water shortage. Also, WS-III and WS-IV can be used as donor genotypes for developing drought tolerant varieties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信