托妮·莫里森《天堂》中平等想象的可能性

Hyejin Kim, Hyunjun Cho
{"title":"托妮·莫里森《天堂》中平等想象的可能性","authors":"Hyejin Kim, Hyunjun Cho","doi":"10.19116/theory.2022.27.2.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores how Morrison’s Paradise delineates “a new space” of a possible resistance for the socially vulnerable in race and gender in terms of Butler’s concept of “an egalitarian imaginary.” The “egalitarian imaginary” seeks to achieve equal conditions of livability and grievablity, essential tothe determination of social equality. Both livability and grievability are the fundamental conditions to build social bonds grounded on interdependency and practice the force of nonviolence against the structural and physical violence. In Paradise the two communities, Ruby and the Convent, are the social abjects who search for a possible home to guarantee freedom and safety. Ruby, the black-only community, desires to fortify their “Paradise” based on reversed hierarchy of skin color and exclusion only to reveal that they are to justify structural violence. On the contrary, the Convent, though it was a mere group of social outcasts at first, emerges to an open space which enables the women to build social bonds by sharing their past trauma, searching for a possibility of livable lives, and claiming equal grievability on their deaths. Paradise presents the force of nonviolence derived from social bonds based on human interdependency that insists the equal claim to livable and grievable lives, thereby suggesting an unrealistic yet manageable vision of “an egalitarian imaginary.”","PeriodicalId":409687,"journal":{"name":"The Criticism and Theory Society of Korea","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Possibility for an Egalitarian Imaginary in Toni Morrison’s Paradise\",\"authors\":\"Hyejin Kim, Hyunjun Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.19116/theory.2022.27.2.33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study explores how Morrison’s Paradise delineates “a new space” of a possible resistance for the socially vulnerable in race and gender in terms of Butler’s concept of “an egalitarian imaginary.” The “egalitarian imaginary” seeks to achieve equal conditions of livability and grievablity, essential tothe determination of social equality. Both livability and grievability are the fundamental conditions to build social bonds grounded on interdependency and practice the force of nonviolence against the structural and physical violence. In Paradise the two communities, Ruby and the Convent, are the social abjects who search for a possible home to guarantee freedom and safety. Ruby, the black-only community, desires to fortify their “Paradise” based on reversed hierarchy of skin color and exclusion only to reveal that they are to justify structural violence. On the contrary, the Convent, though it was a mere group of social outcasts at first, emerges to an open space which enables the women to build social bonds by sharing their past trauma, searching for a possibility of livable lives, and claiming equal grievability on their deaths. Paradise presents the force of nonviolence derived from social bonds based on human interdependency that insists the equal claim to livable and grievable lives, thereby suggesting an unrealistic yet manageable vision of “an egalitarian imaginary.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":409687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Criticism and Theory Society of Korea\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Criticism and Theory Society of Korea\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19116/theory.2022.27.2.33\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Criticism and Theory Society of Korea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19116/theory.2022.27.2.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨莫里森的《天堂》如何根据巴特勒的“平等主义想象”概念,为种族和性别上的社会弱势群体描绘一个可能的抵抗“新空间”。“平等主义想象”寻求实现宜居和悲惨的平等条件,这对确定社会平等至关重要。宜居性和宜居性都是建立在相互依赖基础上的社会纽带的基本条件,也是用非暴力的力量来对抗结构暴力和身体暴力的基本条件。在《天堂》中,Ruby和Convent这两个群体是社会的落魄者,他们在寻找一个可能的家来保证自由和安全。只有黑人的社区鲁比(Ruby)想要巩固他们基于颠倒的肤色等级和排斥的“天堂”,结果却表明他们是在为结构性暴力辩护。相反,修道院虽然最初只是一群被社会抛弃的人,但却出现了一个开放的空间,使妇女能够通过分享过去的创伤来建立社会联系,寻找可生存的生活的可能性,并在死亡时声称平等的悲伤。《天堂》展现了非暴力的力量,这种力量来自于基于人类相互依存的社会纽带,这种纽带坚持对宜居和悲惨生活的平等要求,从而提出了一种不现实但可控的“平等主义想象”愿景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Possibility for an Egalitarian Imaginary in Toni Morrison’s Paradise
This study explores how Morrison’s Paradise delineates “a new space” of a possible resistance for the socially vulnerable in race and gender in terms of Butler’s concept of “an egalitarian imaginary.” The “egalitarian imaginary” seeks to achieve equal conditions of livability and grievablity, essential tothe determination of social equality. Both livability and grievability are the fundamental conditions to build social bonds grounded on interdependency and practice the force of nonviolence against the structural and physical violence. In Paradise the two communities, Ruby and the Convent, are the social abjects who search for a possible home to guarantee freedom and safety. Ruby, the black-only community, desires to fortify their “Paradise” based on reversed hierarchy of skin color and exclusion only to reveal that they are to justify structural violence. On the contrary, the Convent, though it was a mere group of social outcasts at first, emerges to an open space which enables the women to build social bonds by sharing their past trauma, searching for a possibility of livable lives, and claiming equal grievability on their deaths. Paradise presents the force of nonviolence derived from social bonds based on human interdependency that insists the equal claim to livable and grievable lives, thereby suggesting an unrealistic yet manageable vision of “an egalitarian imaginary.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信