{"title":"光流确定和表面重建的光滑性约束的数学基础","authors":"M. A. Snyder","doi":"10.1109/WVM.1989.47100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gradient-based approaches to the computation of optical flow often use a minimization technique incorporating a smoothness constraint on the optical flow field. The author derives the most general form of such a smoothness constraint which is quadratic in first or second derivatives of the grey-level image intensity function, based on three simple assumptions about the smoothness constraint: (1) that it be expressed in a form which is independent of the choice of Cartesian coordinate system in the image; (2) that it be positive definite; and (3) that it not couple different components of the optical flow. It is shown that there are essentially only four such constraints; any smoothness constraint satisfying all three assumptions must be a linear combination of these four, possibly multipled by certain quantities of these four, possibly multipled by certain quantities invariant under a change in the Cartesian coordinate system. Beginning with the three assumptions mentioned above, the author mathematically demonstrates that all the best-known smoothness constraints appearing in the literature are special cases of this general form, and, in particular, that the 'weight matrix' introduced by H.-H. Nagel (1983) is essentially the only physically plausible such constraint.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":342419,"journal":{"name":"[1989] Proceedings. Workshop on Visual Motion","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"76","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the mathematical foundations of smoothness constraints for the determination of optical flow and for surface reconstruction\",\"authors\":\"M. A. Snyder\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WVM.1989.47100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gradient-based approaches to the computation of optical flow often use a minimization technique incorporating a smoothness constraint on the optical flow field. The author derives the most general form of such a smoothness constraint which is quadratic in first or second derivatives of the grey-level image intensity function, based on three simple assumptions about the smoothness constraint: (1) that it be expressed in a form which is independent of the choice of Cartesian coordinate system in the image; (2) that it be positive definite; and (3) that it not couple different components of the optical flow. It is shown that there are essentially only four such constraints; any smoothness constraint satisfying all three assumptions must be a linear combination of these four, possibly multipled by certain quantities of these four, possibly multipled by certain quantities invariant under a change in the Cartesian coordinate system. Beginning with the three assumptions mentioned above, the author mathematically demonstrates that all the best-known smoothness constraints appearing in the literature are special cases of this general form, and, in particular, that the 'weight matrix' introduced by H.-H. Nagel (1983) is essentially the only physically plausible such constraint.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":342419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1989] Proceedings. Workshop on Visual Motion\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"76\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1989] Proceedings. Workshop on Visual Motion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WVM.1989.47100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1989] Proceedings. Workshop on Visual Motion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WVM.1989.47100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
On the mathematical foundations of smoothness constraints for the determination of optical flow and for surface reconstruction
Gradient-based approaches to the computation of optical flow often use a minimization technique incorporating a smoothness constraint on the optical flow field. The author derives the most general form of such a smoothness constraint which is quadratic in first or second derivatives of the grey-level image intensity function, based on three simple assumptions about the smoothness constraint: (1) that it be expressed in a form which is independent of the choice of Cartesian coordinate system in the image; (2) that it be positive definite; and (3) that it not couple different components of the optical flow. It is shown that there are essentially only four such constraints; any smoothness constraint satisfying all three assumptions must be a linear combination of these four, possibly multipled by certain quantities of these four, possibly multipled by certain quantities invariant under a change in the Cartesian coordinate system. Beginning with the three assumptions mentioned above, the author mathematically demonstrates that all the best-known smoothness constraints appearing in the literature are special cases of this general form, and, in particular, that the 'weight matrix' introduced by H.-H. Nagel (1983) is essentially the only physically plausible such constraint.<>