为“更多”而设计:写作的知识与认识论包容性教学

Linda Adler-Kassner
{"title":"为“更多”而设计:写作的知识与认识论包容性教学","authors":"Linda Adler-Kassner","doi":"10.37514/wac-j.2019.30.1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Writing professionals understand that the focus of our discipline—working with people to study writing—leads to conversations about teaching that extend well beyond writing per se. That’s because writing is “never just writing” (Adler-Kassner). Instead, it is two things: the representation of knowledge-making in specific contexts, what we might think of as writing as noun, and a process that can be used to explore those contexts and practices, what we might think of as writing as verb. This latter perspective is reflected in Sandra Tarabochia’s assertion that WAC/WID facilitators can and should act as “designers” with faculty colleagues outside of our discipline, understanding that we can facilitate “investigation[s] of the process of change as an experience of learning” (72). This investigation, Tarabochia asserts, involves collaborative activity that contributes to faculty members’ understandings of their own and others’ experiences with meaning-making within the specific context of their own disciplines, especially as they occur through writing. (72–73). This article reports on a study of faculty participants in a seminar that is grounded in this notion of writing’s professional knowledge. Labeled neither “WAC” nor “WID,” the seminar is based on the idea that writing is never just writing but is instead a product (writing as noun) and a process (writing as verb) integrally related to epistemologies and identities. These include disciplinary epistemologies and identities in which faculty participate by virtue of their membership in academic disciplines. They also include the epistemologies and identities that students bring to those disciplines, especially introductory courses designed to introduce them to those disciplines. The analysis here comes from research that investigates the question: is the seminar “working”? The term working is shorthand for enactments of writing’s professional knowledge: engaging faculty in the study of knowledge and","PeriodicalId":210468,"journal":{"name":"The WAC Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing for �More�: Writing�s Knowledge and Epistemologically Inclusive Teaching\",\"authors\":\"Linda Adler-Kassner\",\"doi\":\"10.37514/wac-j.2019.30.1.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Writing professionals understand that the focus of our discipline—working with people to study writing—leads to conversations about teaching that extend well beyond writing per se. That’s because writing is “never just writing” (Adler-Kassner). Instead, it is two things: the representation of knowledge-making in specific contexts, what we might think of as writing as noun, and a process that can be used to explore those contexts and practices, what we might think of as writing as verb. This latter perspective is reflected in Sandra Tarabochia’s assertion that WAC/WID facilitators can and should act as “designers” with faculty colleagues outside of our discipline, understanding that we can facilitate “investigation[s] of the process of change as an experience of learning” (72). This investigation, Tarabochia asserts, involves collaborative activity that contributes to faculty members’ understandings of their own and others’ experiences with meaning-making within the specific context of their own disciplines, especially as they occur through writing. (72–73). This article reports on a study of faculty participants in a seminar that is grounded in this notion of writing’s professional knowledge. Labeled neither “WAC” nor “WID,” the seminar is based on the idea that writing is never just writing but is instead a product (writing as noun) and a process (writing as verb) integrally related to epistemologies and identities. These include disciplinary epistemologies and identities in which faculty participate by virtue of their membership in academic disciplines. They also include the epistemologies and identities that students bring to those disciplines, especially introductory courses designed to introduce them to those disciplines. The analysis here comes from research that investigates the question: is the seminar “working”? The term working is shorthand for enactments of writing’s professional knowledge: engaging faculty in the study of knowledge and\",\"PeriodicalId\":210468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The WAC Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The WAC Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37514/wac-j.2019.30.1.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The WAC Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37514/wac-j.2019.30.1.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

写作专业人士明白,我们这门学科的重点——与人们一起学习写作——导致了关于教学的讨论,远远超出了写作本身。这是因为写作“绝不仅仅是写作”(阿德勒-卡斯纳)。相反,它是两件事:一是在特定语境中知识生成的表征,我们可以把写作看作名词,二是一个可以用来探索这些语境和实践的过程,我们可以把写作看作动词。后一种观点反映在Sandra Tarabochia的主张中,即WAC/WID的推动者可以而且应该与我们学科以外的教师同事一起扮演“设计师”的角色,理解我们可以促进“将变化过程作为学习经验的调查”(72)。塔拉博基亚断言,这项调查涉及合作活动,有助于教师在自己学科的特定背景下理解自己和他人的意义创造经验,特别是通过写作进行的。(72 - 73)。这篇文章报道了一项对参加研讨会的教师的研究,该研讨会以写作的专业知识为基础。这个研讨会既不被称为“WAC”,也不被称为“WID”,它基于这样一种观点:写作从来不只是写作,而是一种产品(作为名词的写作)和一个过程(作为动词的写作),与认识论和身份相关联。这些包括学科认识论和身份,教师通过他们在学科中的成员资格参与其中。它们还包括学生带给这些学科的认识论和认同,尤其是那些为他们介绍这些学科而设计的入门课程。这里的分析来自于调查这个问题的研究:研讨会“有效”吗?“工作”一词是写作专业知识实践的简写:让教师参与对知识的研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing for �More�: Writing�s Knowledge and Epistemologically Inclusive Teaching
Writing professionals understand that the focus of our discipline—working with people to study writing—leads to conversations about teaching that extend well beyond writing per se. That’s because writing is “never just writing” (Adler-Kassner). Instead, it is two things: the representation of knowledge-making in specific contexts, what we might think of as writing as noun, and a process that can be used to explore those contexts and practices, what we might think of as writing as verb. This latter perspective is reflected in Sandra Tarabochia’s assertion that WAC/WID facilitators can and should act as “designers” with faculty colleagues outside of our discipline, understanding that we can facilitate “investigation[s] of the process of change as an experience of learning” (72). This investigation, Tarabochia asserts, involves collaborative activity that contributes to faculty members’ understandings of their own and others’ experiences with meaning-making within the specific context of their own disciplines, especially as they occur through writing. (72–73). This article reports on a study of faculty participants in a seminar that is grounded in this notion of writing’s professional knowledge. Labeled neither “WAC” nor “WID,” the seminar is based on the idea that writing is never just writing but is instead a product (writing as noun) and a process (writing as verb) integrally related to epistemologies and identities. These include disciplinary epistemologies and identities in which faculty participate by virtue of their membership in academic disciplines. They also include the epistemologies and identities that students bring to those disciplines, especially introductory courses designed to introduce them to those disciplines. The analysis here comes from research that investigates the question: is the seminar “working”? The term working is shorthand for enactments of writing’s professional knowledge: engaging faculty in the study of knowledge and
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信