采煤工作面的沧桑:在国家法院执行联邦法的救济和程序

F. Episcopo
{"title":"采煤工作面的沧桑:在国家法院执行联邦法的救济和程序","authors":"F. Episcopo","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192846556.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chapter discusses the evolution of European law concerning national remedies and procedures involved in enforcing EU rights and obligations, combining an exposition of the case law with a critical discussion of the mainstream scholarship. EU law on national remedies is traditionally embodied in the equivalence-effectiveness test, whose jurisprudence is systematized into three periods of varying scrutiny. After the Lisbon Treaty, it is pictured as increasingly based on the principle of effective judicial protection, Articles 19 TEU and 47 EUCFR, suggesting a possible ‘human-rights-oriented twist’ in the field. Adopting a critical stand, the chapter shows how the traditional systematization misses additional strands of cases and facets to the Rewe-effectiveness, while the substantial implications of the latest trends are still under development.","PeriodicalId":378313,"journal":{"name":"The Evolution of EU Law","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Vicissitudes of Life at the Coalface: Remedies and Procedures for Enforcing Union Law Before National Courts\",\"authors\":\"F. Episcopo\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780192846556.003.0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The chapter discusses the evolution of European law concerning national remedies and procedures involved in enforcing EU rights and obligations, combining an exposition of the case law with a critical discussion of the mainstream scholarship. EU law on national remedies is traditionally embodied in the equivalence-effectiveness test, whose jurisprudence is systematized into three periods of varying scrutiny. After the Lisbon Treaty, it is pictured as increasingly based on the principle of effective judicial protection, Articles 19 TEU and 47 EUCFR, suggesting a possible ‘human-rights-oriented twist’ in the field. Adopting a critical stand, the chapter shows how the traditional systematization misses additional strands of cases and facets to the Rewe-effectiveness, while the substantial implications of the latest trends are still under development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":378313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Evolution of EU Law\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Evolution of EU Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192846556.003.0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Evolution of EU Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192846556.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章讨论了欧洲法律的演变,涉及执行欧盟权利和义务的国家救济和程序,结合对判例法的阐述和对主流学术的批判性讨论。欧盟关于国家救济的法律传统上体现在等效效力测试中,其法理被系统化分为三个不同的审查阶段。在《里斯本条约》之后,它被描绘成越来越基于有效司法保护的原则,第19条TEU和第47条EUCFR,这表明该领域可能出现“以人权为导向的扭曲”。本章采取批判的立场,表明传统的系统化如何忽略了新有效性的其他案例和方面,而最新趋势的实质性影响仍在发展中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Vicissitudes of Life at the Coalface: Remedies and Procedures for Enforcing Union Law Before National Courts
The chapter discusses the evolution of European law concerning national remedies and procedures involved in enforcing EU rights and obligations, combining an exposition of the case law with a critical discussion of the mainstream scholarship. EU law on national remedies is traditionally embodied in the equivalence-effectiveness test, whose jurisprudence is systematized into three periods of varying scrutiny. After the Lisbon Treaty, it is pictured as increasingly based on the principle of effective judicial protection, Articles 19 TEU and 47 EUCFR, suggesting a possible ‘human-rights-oriented twist’ in the field. Adopting a critical stand, the chapter shows how the traditional systematization misses additional strands of cases and facets to the Rewe-effectiveness, while the substantial implications of the latest trends are still under development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信