发展溢出与制度变迁:贸易经济政治视角

Hao Bo
{"title":"发展溢出与制度变迁:贸易经济政治视角","authors":"Hao Bo","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3001888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper I theoretically argue that people weigh specialization gains against trade costs when they decide whether to specialize and trade or self-produce all goods by themselves. Trade costs relate to institutional quality. Thus, more people participate in trade under better institutions. I also show that the better the institution of an economy’s trade partner, the more prosperous the economy is, thanks to expanded trade. Moreover, when more people trade, more people would like to fight for a better institution and may induce institutional changes. Better initial institutions or lower trade costs facilitate institutional improvements; but with very high initial institutional quality, people may lose their incentive to protest. I also provide historical evidence consistent with the theory.","PeriodicalId":426783,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Trade Policy (Topic)","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development Spillover and Institutional Changes: A Trade Economy Political Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Hao Bo\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3001888\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper I theoretically argue that people weigh specialization gains against trade costs when they decide whether to specialize and trade or self-produce all goods by themselves. Trade costs relate to institutional quality. Thus, more people participate in trade under better institutions. I also show that the better the institution of an economy’s trade partner, the more prosperous the economy is, thanks to expanded trade. Moreover, when more people trade, more people would like to fight for a better institution and may induce institutional changes. Better initial institutions or lower trade costs facilitate institutional improvements; but with very high initial institutional quality, people may lose their incentive to protest. I also provide historical evidence consistent with the theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Trade Policy (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Trade Policy (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3001888\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Trade Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3001888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我从理论上认为,当人们决定是专业化和贸易还是自己生产所有商品时,他们会权衡专业化收益与贸易成本。贸易成本与制度质量有关。因此,更多的人在更好的制度下参与贸易。我还表明,一个经济体的贸易伙伴制度越好,由于贸易扩大,经济就越繁荣。此外,当更多的人交易时,更多的人想要争取更好的制度,并可能引发制度变革。较好的初始制度或较低的贸易成本有助于制度的改进;但如果初始制度质量非常高,人们可能会失去抗议的动力。我还提供了与该理论相一致的历史证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development Spillover and Institutional Changes: A Trade Economy Political Perspective
In this paper I theoretically argue that people weigh specialization gains against trade costs when they decide whether to specialize and trade or self-produce all goods by themselves. Trade costs relate to institutional quality. Thus, more people participate in trade under better institutions. I also show that the better the institution of an economy’s trade partner, the more prosperous the economy is, thanks to expanded trade. Moreover, when more people trade, more people would like to fight for a better institution and may induce institutional changes. Better initial institutions or lower trade costs facilitate institutional improvements; but with very high initial institutional quality, people may lose their incentive to protest. I also provide historical evidence consistent with the theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信