1863年6月25日至7月2日,“我无法想象斯图亚特的情况”:斯图亚特的缺席对邦联作战的影响

C. Norville
{"title":"1863年6月25日至7月2日,“我无法想象斯图亚特的情况”:斯图亚特的缺席对邦联作战的影响","authors":"C. Norville","doi":"10.1353/GET.2017.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“I Cannot Think What Has Become of Stuart” spy, not from his trusted cavalry chief, Maj. Gen. J. E. B. Stuart. Stuart had ridden off with three cavalry brigades on June 25 and had not been heard from since, leaving Lee to wonder where he was, what the Federals were up to, and why he had not heard from his cavalry. In the absence of detailed information concerning Union troop movements, Lee’s tactical options immediately narrowed, forcing him to radically change his plans and compelling him to operate in an information vacuum that would grow worse in the coming days. Entire volumes and countless articles have already minutely examined the question of the responsibility for Stuart’s absence.1 Rather than retreading that ground, this brief article examines the implications of Stuart’s absence on Lee’s decisionmaking process and how his tactical options were both limited and hindered during the critical period from June 25, when Stuart began his ride around the Union army, to July 2, when Stuart rejoined the Army of Northern Virginia, which was already engaged at Gettysburg.","PeriodicalId":268075,"journal":{"name":"Gettysburg Magazine","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“I Cannot Think What Has Become of Stuart”: The Impact of Stuart’s Absence on Confederate Operations, June 25 to July 2, 1863\",\"authors\":\"C. Norville\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/GET.2017.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"“I Cannot Think What Has Become of Stuart” spy, not from his trusted cavalry chief, Maj. Gen. J. E. B. Stuart. Stuart had ridden off with three cavalry brigades on June 25 and had not been heard from since, leaving Lee to wonder where he was, what the Federals were up to, and why he had not heard from his cavalry. In the absence of detailed information concerning Union troop movements, Lee’s tactical options immediately narrowed, forcing him to radically change his plans and compelling him to operate in an information vacuum that would grow worse in the coming days. Entire volumes and countless articles have already minutely examined the question of the responsibility for Stuart’s absence.1 Rather than retreading that ground, this brief article examines the implications of Stuart’s absence on Lee’s decisionmaking process and how his tactical options were both limited and hindered during the critical period from June 25, when Stuart began his ride around the Union army, to July 2, when Stuart rejoined the Army of Northern Virginia, which was already engaged at Gettysburg.\",\"PeriodicalId\":268075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gettysburg Magazine\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gettysburg Magazine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/GET.2017.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gettysburg Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/GET.2017.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“我不知道斯图尔特怎么样了”的间谍,而不是他信任的骑兵队长j·e·b·斯图尔特少将。6月25日,斯图尔特率领三个骑兵旅离开了,此后一直杳无音信,这使李将军很想知道他在哪里,联邦军在做什么,为什么他没有收到骑兵的消息。由于缺乏有关联军部队动向的详细信息,李将军的战术选择立即缩小,迫使他从根本上改变他的计划,迫使他在信息真空的情况下作战,这种情况在接下来的日子里会变得更糟。关于斯图亚特缺席的责任问题,已经有好几卷书和数不清的文章详细地研究过了这篇简短的文章并没有重述这一观点,而是考察了斯图尔特的缺席对李将军决策过程的影响,以及他的战术选择在关键时期是如何受到限制和阻碍的,从6月25日斯图尔特开始在联邦军周围作战,到7月2日斯图尔特重新加入已经在葛底斯堡交战的北弗吉尼亚军队。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“I Cannot Think What Has Become of Stuart”: The Impact of Stuart’s Absence on Confederate Operations, June 25 to July 2, 1863
“I Cannot Think What Has Become of Stuart” spy, not from his trusted cavalry chief, Maj. Gen. J. E. B. Stuart. Stuart had ridden off with three cavalry brigades on June 25 and had not been heard from since, leaving Lee to wonder where he was, what the Federals were up to, and why he had not heard from his cavalry. In the absence of detailed information concerning Union troop movements, Lee’s tactical options immediately narrowed, forcing him to radically change his plans and compelling him to operate in an information vacuum that would grow worse in the coming days. Entire volumes and countless articles have already minutely examined the question of the responsibility for Stuart’s absence.1 Rather than retreading that ground, this brief article examines the implications of Stuart’s absence on Lee’s decisionmaking process and how his tactical options were both limited and hindered during the critical period from June 25, when Stuart began his ride around the Union army, to July 2, when Stuart rejoined the Army of Northern Virginia, which was already engaged at Gettysburg.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信