罗杰·威廉姆斯的法律话语运用:新英格兰早期的权威检验

C. Felker
{"title":"罗杰·威廉姆斯的法律话语运用:新英格兰早期的权威检验","authors":"C. Felker","doi":"10.2307/365921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The legal establishment in the seventeenth century was increasingly hostile to the use of elaborate language and rhetorical flourish; the copiousness and amplification so typical of Puritan discourse, on the other hand, served to suppress the desire to eliminate abstruse and unverifiable terms, concepts, and doctrines from the debates of the day. A firm believer that there ought to exist some sort of fundamental law (a charter) to curb the excesses of government, Roger Williams presided over a shifting sensibility about power and authority.","PeriodicalId":384496,"journal":{"name":"LIT: Colonial American Literature (Topic)","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Roger Williams's Uses of Legal Discourse: Testing Authority in Early New England\",\"authors\":\"C. Felker\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/365921\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The legal establishment in the seventeenth century was increasingly hostile to the use of elaborate language and rhetorical flourish; the copiousness and amplification so typical of Puritan discourse, on the other hand, served to suppress the desire to eliminate abstruse and unverifiable terms, concepts, and doctrines from the debates of the day. A firm believer that there ought to exist some sort of fundamental law (a charter) to curb the excesses of government, Roger Williams presided over a shifting sensibility about power and authority.\",\"PeriodicalId\":384496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LIT: Colonial American Literature (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LIT: Colonial American Literature (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/365921\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LIT: Colonial American Literature (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/365921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

17世纪的法律机构越来越反对使用繁复的语言和华丽的修辞;另一方面,清教徒话语中如此典型的丰富和扩大化,抑制了人们从当时的辩论中消除深奥和无法证实的术语、概念和教义的愿望。罗杰·威廉姆斯坚信,应该存在某种基本法律(宪章)来约束政府的过度行为,他对权力和权威的敏感性正在发生转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Roger Williams's Uses of Legal Discourse: Testing Authority in Early New England
The legal establishment in the seventeenth century was increasingly hostile to the use of elaborate language and rhetorical flourish; the copiousness and amplification so typical of Puritan discourse, on the other hand, served to suppress the desire to eliminate abstruse and unverifiable terms, concepts, and doctrines from the debates of the day. A firm believer that there ought to exist some sort of fundamental law (a charter) to curb the excesses of government, Roger Williams presided over a shifting sensibility about power and authority.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信