桡动脉导管护理管理:质量与安全

Nancy P. Hanrahan, L. Letourneau, Rachel Batty
{"title":"桡动脉导管护理管理:质量与安全","authors":"Nancy P. Hanrahan, L. Letourneau, Rachel Batty","doi":"10.12691/ajnr-10-1-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Radial arterial lines (RALs) are used to obtain precise measurement and provide continuous blood pressure monitoring of critically ill patients. Critical care nurses are the primary responsible clinician for maintaining the safety and effectiveness of radial arterial lines (RALs). Gaps exist in the practice literature about tools that help nurses stabilize the wrist joint for safe maintenance of RALs. Local Problem: The purpose of this study was to improve the quality and safety of RALs by establishing use, safety, and preferences of critical care nurses for tools that help them manage RALs. Methods/Intervention: A mix method approach provided in-depth qualitative and quantitative data in two phases: Phase I: Survey of critical care nurse management of RALs and Phase II: a Focus Group of Critical Care Nurse Experts exploring the use, safety, and perception of tools to manage RALs. Results: Nurses reported that visual inspection of the insertion site of an RAL (97.1%); adjustment of the wrist angle (98.5%) and stabilization of the wrist (88.2%) were critical areas for safe management. Nurses voiced concern about the lack of the availability of adequate tools to manage RAL. Conclusions: Too often the nurses' jury rig devices to stabilize a patient’s wrist and the nurses reported frequent adverse events such as infections, skin breakdown, and inaccurate blood pressure measurements. These outcomes are costly for hospitals and patients. Nurses reported preference for flexible/bendable armboards, but they were reported often not available. Nurses need up-to-date tools to perform best practices that keep patients safe.","PeriodicalId":210760,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Nursing Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurse Management of Radial Arterial Lines: Quality & Safety\",\"authors\":\"Nancy P. Hanrahan, L. Letourneau, Rachel Batty\",\"doi\":\"10.12691/ajnr-10-1-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Radial arterial lines (RALs) are used to obtain precise measurement and provide continuous blood pressure monitoring of critically ill patients. Critical care nurses are the primary responsible clinician for maintaining the safety and effectiveness of radial arterial lines (RALs). Gaps exist in the practice literature about tools that help nurses stabilize the wrist joint for safe maintenance of RALs. Local Problem: The purpose of this study was to improve the quality and safety of RALs by establishing use, safety, and preferences of critical care nurses for tools that help them manage RALs. Methods/Intervention: A mix method approach provided in-depth qualitative and quantitative data in two phases: Phase I: Survey of critical care nurse management of RALs and Phase II: a Focus Group of Critical Care Nurse Experts exploring the use, safety, and perception of tools to manage RALs. Results: Nurses reported that visual inspection of the insertion site of an RAL (97.1%); adjustment of the wrist angle (98.5%) and stabilization of the wrist (88.2%) were critical areas for safe management. Nurses voiced concern about the lack of the availability of adequate tools to manage RAL. Conclusions: Too often the nurses' jury rig devices to stabilize a patient’s wrist and the nurses reported frequent adverse events such as infections, skin breakdown, and inaccurate blood pressure measurements. These outcomes are costly for hospitals and patients. Nurses reported preference for flexible/bendable armboards, but they were reported often not available. Nurses need up-to-date tools to perform best practices that keep patients safe.\",\"PeriodicalId\":210760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Nursing Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Nursing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12691/ajnr-10-1-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12691/ajnr-10-1-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:桡动脉线(RALs)用于获得精确测量并为危重患者提供持续的血压监测。重症监护护士是维持桡动脉导管安全性和有效性的主要临床责任医师。关于帮助护士稳定腕关节以安全维持ral的工具的实践文献中存在空白。局部问题:本研究的目的是通过确定重症护理护士对帮助他们管理RALs的工具的使用、安全性和偏好来提高RALs的质量和安全性。方法/干预:采用混合方法,分两阶段提供深入的定性和定量数据:第一阶段:重症护理护士对RALs管理的调查;第二阶段:重症护理专家焦点小组探讨RALs管理工具的使用、安全性和感知。结果:护士报告目视检查RAL插入部位(97.1%);调整手腕角度(98.5%)和稳定手腕(88.2%)是安全管理的关键领域。护士对缺乏足够的工具来管理RAL表示关切。结论:护士的陪审团经常使用器械来稳定患者的手腕,护士经常报告不良事件,如感染、皮肤破裂和不准确的血压测量。这些结果对医院和患者来说代价高昂。护士报告更喜欢柔性/可弯曲的护臂板,但据报道通常没有。护士需要最新的工具来执行最佳实践,保证病人的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nurse Management of Radial Arterial Lines: Quality & Safety
Background: Radial arterial lines (RALs) are used to obtain precise measurement and provide continuous blood pressure monitoring of critically ill patients. Critical care nurses are the primary responsible clinician for maintaining the safety and effectiveness of radial arterial lines (RALs). Gaps exist in the practice literature about tools that help nurses stabilize the wrist joint for safe maintenance of RALs. Local Problem: The purpose of this study was to improve the quality and safety of RALs by establishing use, safety, and preferences of critical care nurses for tools that help them manage RALs. Methods/Intervention: A mix method approach provided in-depth qualitative and quantitative data in two phases: Phase I: Survey of critical care nurse management of RALs and Phase II: a Focus Group of Critical Care Nurse Experts exploring the use, safety, and perception of tools to manage RALs. Results: Nurses reported that visual inspection of the insertion site of an RAL (97.1%); adjustment of the wrist angle (98.5%) and stabilization of the wrist (88.2%) were critical areas for safe management. Nurses voiced concern about the lack of the availability of adequate tools to manage RAL. Conclusions: Too often the nurses' jury rig devices to stabilize a patient’s wrist and the nurses reported frequent adverse events such as infections, skin breakdown, and inaccurate blood pressure measurements. These outcomes are costly for hospitals and patients. Nurses reported preference for flexible/bendable armboards, but they were reported often not available. Nurses need up-to-date tools to perform best practices that keep patients safe.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信