A. Alsahaf, G. Azzopardi, B. Ducro, R. Veerkamp, N. Petkov
{"title":"用回归树集合预测猪的屠宰体重","authors":"A. Alsahaf, G. Azzopardi, B. Ducro, R. Veerkamp, N. Petkov","doi":"10.3233/978-1-61499-929-4-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Domestic pigs vary in the age at which they reach slaughter weight even under the controlled conditions of modern pig farming. Early and accurate estimates of when a pig will reach slaughter weight can lead to logistic efficiency in farms. In this study, we compare four methods in predicting the age at which a pig reaches slaughter weight (120 kg). Namely, we compare the following regression tree-based ensemble methods: random forest (RF), extremely randomized trees (ET), gradient boosted machines (GBM), and XGBoost. Data from 32979 pigs is used, comprising a combination of phenotypic features and estimated breeding values (EBV). We found that the boosting ensemble methods, GBM and XGBoost, achieve lower prediction errors than the parallel ensembles methods, RF and ET. On the other hand, RF and ET have fewer parameters to tune, and perform adequately well with default parameter settings.","PeriodicalId":276901,"journal":{"name":"Applications of Intelligent Systems","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Slaughter Weight in Pigs with Regression Tree Ensembles\",\"authors\":\"A. Alsahaf, G. Azzopardi, B. Ducro, R. Veerkamp, N. Petkov\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/978-1-61499-929-4-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Domestic pigs vary in the age at which they reach slaughter weight even under the controlled conditions of modern pig farming. Early and accurate estimates of when a pig will reach slaughter weight can lead to logistic efficiency in farms. In this study, we compare four methods in predicting the age at which a pig reaches slaughter weight (120 kg). Namely, we compare the following regression tree-based ensemble methods: random forest (RF), extremely randomized trees (ET), gradient boosted machines (GBM), and XGBoost. Data from 32979 pigs is used, comprising a combination of phenotypic features and estimated breeding values (EBV). We found that the boosting ensemble methods, GBM and XGBoost, achieve lower prediction errors than the parallel ensembles methods, RF and ET. On the other hand, RF and ET have fewer parameters to tune, and perform adequately well with default parameter settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":276901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applications of Intelligent Systems\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applications of Intelligent Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-929-4-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applications of Intelligent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-929-4-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predicting Slaughter Weight in Pigs with Regression Tree Ensembles
Domestic pigs vary in the age at which they reach slaughter weight even under the controlled conditions of modern pig farming. Early and accurate estimates of when a pig will reach slaughter weight can lead to logistic efficiency in farms. In this study, we compare four methods in predicting the age at which a pig reaches slaughter weight (120 kg). Namely, we compare the following regression tree-based ensemble methods: random forest (RF), extremely randomized trees (ET), gradient boosted machines (GBM), and XGBoost. Data from 32979 pigs is used, comprising a combination of phenotypic features and estimated breeding values (EBV). We found that the boosting ensemble methods, GBM and XGBoost, achieve lower prediction errors than the parallel ensembles methods, RF and ET. On the other hand, RF and ET have fewer parameters to tune, and perform adequately well with default parameter settings.