优化外差式和直接探测式大气遥感CO2激光雷达的分析比较*

D. Killinger, N. Menyuk
{"title":"优化外差式和直接探测式大气遥感CO2激光雷达的分析比较*","authors":"D. Killinger, N. Menyuk","doi":"10.1364/clr.1983.tha5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our recent experimental study1 of the relative technical merits of heterodyne and direct-detection CO2 DIAL for path-averaged remote sensing was carried out using LIDAR backscattered returns from topographic targets. In these studies, the average SNR's and statistical and temporal characteristics of the LIDAR returns were measured simultaneously for each detection technique. The experimental results were found to be in good agreement with a simple analysis which predicted the relative sensitivity of each detection technique for path-averaged measurements. The detection systems used in the above experiments were not optimized for either of the two detection techniques.","PeriodicalId":408663,"journal":{"name":"2nd Topical Meeting on Coherent Laser Radar: Technology and Applications","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analytical Comparison of Optimized Heterodyne and Direct-Detection CO2 Lidar for Atmospheric Remote Sensing*\",\"authors\":\"D. Killinger, N. Menyuk\",\"doi\":\"10.1364/clr.1983.tha5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our recent experimental study1 of the relative technical merits of heterodyne and direct-detection CO2 DIAL for path-averaged remote sensing was carried out using LIDAR backscattered returns from topographic targets. In these studies, the average SNR's and statistical and temporal characteristics of the LIDAR returns were measured simultaneously for each detection technique. The experimental results were found to be in good agreement with a simple analysis which predicted the relative sensitivity of each detection technique for path-averaged measurements. The detection systems used in the above experiments were not optimized for either of the two detection techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":408663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2nd Topical Meeting on Coherent Laser Radar: Technology and Applications\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2nd Topical Meeting on Coherent Laser Radar: Technology and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1364/clr.1983.tha5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2nd Topical Meeting on Coherent Laser Radar: Technology and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1364/clr.1983.tha5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们最近利用地形目标的激光雷达反向散射回波,对外差和直接探测CO2 DIAL用于路径平均遥感的相对技术优点进行了实验研究。在这些研究中,同时测量了每种探测技术的平均信噪比以及激光雷达回波的统计和时间特征。实验结果与一个简单的分析相吻合,该分析预测了每种检测技术对路径平均测量的相对灵敏度。上述实验中使用的检测系统没有针对两种检测技术中的任何一种进行优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analytical Comparison of Optimized Heterodyne and Direct-Detection CO2 Lidar for Atmospheric Remote Sensing*
Our recent experimental study1 of the relative technical merits of heterodyne and direct-detection CO2 DIAL for path-averaged remote sensing was carried out using LIDAR backscattered returns from topographic targets. In these studies, the average SNR's and statistical and temporal characteristics of the LIDAR returns were measured simultaneously for each detection technique. The experimental results were found to be in good agreement with a simple analysis which predicted the relative sensitivity of each detection technique for path-averaged measurements. The detection systems used in the above experiments were not optimized for either of the two detection techniques.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信