社会网络中的信任关系预测:以应急响应为例

Nikhita Vedula, S. Parthasarathy, V. Shalin
{"title":"社会网络中的信任关系预测:以应急响应为例","authors":"Nikhita Vedula, S. Parthasarathy, V. Shalin","doi":"10.1145/3091478.3091494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trust is a fundamental construct underpinning modern society and the social exchanges it contains. The rise of Web 2.0 technologies and the increased use of online social networks, promotes the study of trust among users. Drawing on social and psychological theory, we detect pairwise and global trust relations between users in the context of emergent real-world crisis scenarios. In such situations and scale, seeking explicit pairwise trust assessments between users is impractical. Instead, in an unsupervised manner we integrate the implicit factors of social influence exerted by each user over the network, the underlying network structural topology and the affective valence expressed by the users in the textual content they communicate. A key finding is the importance of modeling influence and affective valence in such exchanges and their role in detecting stable trust relationships. We extensively evaluate these ideas and demonstrate significant gains over competitive baselines across multiple datasets drawn from both crisis and non-crisis scenarios, including those with normative ground truth.","PeriodicalId":165747,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference","volume":"154 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Trust Relations Within a Social Network: A Case Study on Emergency Response\",\"authors\":\"Nikhita Vedula, S. Parthasarathy, V. Shalin\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3091478.3091494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Trust is a fundamental construct underpinning modern society and the social exchanges it contains. The rise of Web 2.0 technologies and the increased use of online social networks, promotes the study of trust among users. Drawing on social and psychological theory, we detect pairwise and global trust relations between users in the context of emergent real-world crisis scenarios. In such situations and scale, seeking explicit pairwise trust assessments between users is impractical. Instead, in an unsupervised manner we integrate the implicit factors of social influence exerted by each user over the network, the underlying network structural topology and the affective valence expressed by the users in the textual content they communicate. A key finding is the importance of modeling influence and affective valence in such exchanges and their role in detecting stable trust relationships. We extensively evaluate these ideas and demonstrate significant gains over competitive baselines across multiple datasets drawn from both crisis and non-crisis scenarios, including those with normative ground truth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":165747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference\",\"volume\":\"154 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3091478.3091494\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3091478.3091494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

信任是支撑现代社会及其所包含的社会交往的基本结构。Web 2.0技术的兴起和在线社交网络使用的增加,促进了对用户之间信任的研究。利用社会和心理学理论,我们在紧急的现实世界危机场景中检测用户之间的成对和全局信任关系。在这种情况和规模下,在用户之间寻求明确的两两信任评估是不切实际的。相反,我们以一种无监督的方式整合了每个用户在网络上施加的社会影响的隐含因素,潜在的网络结构拓扑和用户在他们交流的文本内容中表达的情感价。一个关键的发现是在这种交换中建模影响和情感价的重要性及其在检测稳定信任关系中的作用。我们对这些想法进行了广泛的评估,并在从危机和非危机情景中提取的多个数据集(包括具有规范基础事实的数据集)中展示了与竞争基线相比的显著收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting Trust Relations Within a Social Network: A Case Study on Emergency Response
Trust is a fundamental construct underpinning modern society and the social exchanges it contains. The rise of Web 2.0 technologies and the increased use of online social networks, promotes the study of trust among users. Drawing on social and psychological theory, we detect pairwise and global trust relations between users in the context of emergent real-world crisis scenarios. In such situations and scale, seeking explicit pairwise trust assessments between users is impractical. Instead, in an unsupervised manner we integrate the implicit factors of social influence exerted by each user over the network, the underlying network structural topology and the affective valence expressed by the users in the textual content they communicate. A key finding is the importance of modeling influence and affective valence in such exchanges and their role in detecting stable trust relationships. We extensively evaluate these ideas and demonstrate significant gains over competitive baselines across multiple datasets drawn from both crisis and non-crisis scenarios, including those with normative ground truth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信