论逻辑连接词的语用

J. Moeschler
{"title":"论逻辑连接词的语用","authors":"J. Moeschler","doi":"10.1515/9783110607963-008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the issue of connectives in natural language, adopting a formalist approach in pragmatics. The outcome is that truth-conditional connectives are limited to conjunction, disjunction and conditional, and that negation, even in its metalinguistic and non-truth-conditional usages, has representational contextual effects, as suppressing a proposition and a presupposition or strengthening a proposition. As regards discourse connectives, they exhibits a strong pragmatic property, that is, they almost all exhibit factivity. Finally, quasi-synonym connectives, as causal ones, do not differ in meaning but in the way their conceptual and procedural meanings are distributed at different layers.","PeriodicalId":244606,"journal":{"name":"Aspects of Linguistic Variation","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the pragmatics of logical connectives\",\"authors\":\"J. Moeschler\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110607963-008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses the issue of connectives in natural language, adopting a formalist approach in pragmatics. The outcome is that truth-conditional connectives are limited to conjunction, disjunction and conditional, and that negation, even in its metalinguistic and non-truth-conditional usages, has representational contextual effects, as suppressing a proposition and a presupposition or strengthening a proposition. As regards discourse connectives, they exhibits a strong pragmatic property, that is, they almost all exhibit factivity. Finally, quasi-synonym connectives, as causal ones, do not differ in meaning but in the way their conceptual and procedural meanings are distributed at different layers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":244606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aspects of Linguistic Variation\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aspects of Linguistic Variation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110607963-008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aspects of Linguistic Variation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110607963-008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文从语用学的角度出发,探讨了自然语言中的连接词问题。结果是,真-条件连接词仅限于连接、分离和条件,而否定,即使在元语言和非真-条件用法中,也具有表征语境效应,如抑制命题和前提或加强命题。就语篇连接词而言,它们表现出强烈的语用特性,即它们几乎都表现出行为性。最后,作为因果关系的准同义词连接词在意义上并无差异,只是其概念意义和程序意义在不同层次上的分布方式不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the pragmatics of logical connectives
This paper discusses the issue of connectives in natural language, adopting a formalist approach in pragmatics. The outcome is that truth-conditional connectives are limited to conjunction, disjunction and conditional, and that negation, even in its metalinguistic and non-truth-conditional usages, has representational contextual effects, as suppressing a proposition and a presupposition or strengthening a proposition. As regards discourse connectives, they exhibits a strong pragmatic property, that is, they almost all exhibit factivity. Finally, quasi-synonym connectives, as causal ones, do not differ in meaning but in the way their conceptual and procedural meanings are distributed at different layers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信