从进步法学的角度重构总统选举之争的完成

Nicholay Aprilindo, I. Handayani, A. Sulistiyono
{"title":"从进步法学的角度重构总统选举之争的完成","authors":"Nicholay Aprilindo, I. Handayani, A. Sulistiyono","doi":"10.2991/icglow-19.2019.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"- The implementation of elections must refer to the principles of honesty and justice. The occurrence of violations in a systematic and massive structure has given a dominant position. This dominant position is the main cause that influences vote acquisition. Thus, determining the existence of electoral fraud must be seen from the existence of structured and systematic actions in the form of a dominant position that results in massive vote acquisition. The dominant position is very decisive in terms of proving electoral fraud qualitatively. The massive vote acquisition is resultant. Referring to the progressive law paradigm, related to the violation of the Presidential Election which is in TSM, the approach is to ensure the existence of a causality relationship between the dominant position and illegal vote acquisition. So it is a qualitative approach. As long as it can be proven that there is a correspondence between systematically structured actions that given a dominant position, then the results of massive fraud by itself can be easily proven.","PeriodicalId":246077,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Globalization of Law and Local Wisdom (ICGLOW 2019)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconstruction of the Completion of Presidential Election Dispute by Progressive Law Approach\",\"authors\":\"Nicholay Aprilindo, I. Handayani, A. Sulistiyono\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/icglow-19.2019.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"- The implementation of elections must refer to the principles of honesty and justice. The occurrence of violations in a systematic and massive structure has given a dominant position. This dominant position is the main cause that influences vote acquisition. Thus, determining the existence of electoral fraud must be seen from the existence of structured and systematic actions in the form of a dominant position that results in massive vote acquisition. The dominant position is very decisive in terms of proving electoral fraud qualitatively. The massive vote acquisition is resultant. Referring to the progressive law paradigm, related to the violation of the Presidential Election which is in TSM, the approach is to ensure the existence of a causality relationship between the dominant position and illegal vote acquisition. So it is a qualitative approach. As long as it can be proven that there is a correspondence between systematically structured actions that given a dominant position, then the results of massive fraud by itself can be easily proven.\",\"PeriodicalId\":246077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Globalization of Law and Local Wisdom (ICGLOW 2019)\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Globalization of Law and Local Wisdom (ICGLOW 2019)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/icglow-19.2019.23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Globalization of Law and Local Wisdom (ICGLOW 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/icglow-19.2019.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

-选举的执行必须参照诚实和正义的原则。违法行为的发生具有系统性和大规模的结构,具有主导地位。这种优势地位是影响获得选票的主要原因。因此,确定选举舞弊的存在必须从存在以主导地位的形式导致大量选票获得的结构性和系统性行动来看待。在定性证明选举舞弊方面,优势地位是非常决定性的。获得大量选票是结果。参照进步法律范式,对于TSM中涉及的总统选举违规行为,其做法是确保优势地位与非法获得选票之间存在因果关系。所以这是一种定性方法。只要能够证明在给予支配地位的系统结构化行为之间存在对应关系,那么大规模欺诈本身的结果就很容易被证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reconstruction of the Completion of Presidential Election Dispute by Progressive Law Approach
- The implementation of elections must refer to the principles of honesty and justice. The occurrence of violations in a systematic and massive structure has given a dominant position. This dominant position is the main cause that influences vote acquisition. Thus, determining the existence of electoral fraud must be seen from the existence of structured and systematic actions in the form of a dominant position that results in massive vote acquisition. The dominant position is very decisive in terms of proving electoral fraud qualitatively. The massive vote acquisition is resultant. Referring to the progressive law paradigm, related to the violation of the Presidential Election which is in TSM, the approach is to ensure the existence of a causality relationship between the dominant position and illegal vote acquisition. So it is a qualitative approach. As long as it can be proven that there is a correspondence between systematically structured actions that given a dominant position, then the results of massive fraud by itself can be easily proven.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信