海带蟹的快速消费:对华盛顿州海獭的影响

Carter J Johnson, J. Hale, M. Tinker, Erin U Foster, J. Samhouri, A. Shelton, K. Laidre
{"title":"海带蟹的快速消费:对华盛顿州海獭的影响","authors":"Carter J Johnson, J. Hale, M. Tinker, Erin U Foster, J. Samhouri, A. Shelton, K. Laidre","doi":"10.1898/NWN20-07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As animal populations approach environmental carrying capacity, competition for food increases, generally leading to decreased individual energy intake rate. Energy-intake rate can therefore be used as one metric of population status relative to carrying capacity. Focal observations of Sea Otter (Enhydra lutris) foraging behavior have been used throughout their range to estimate energy-intake rates and infer population status. In Washington State, previous research has demonstrated that handling times for Kelp Crabs (Pugettia spp.) by Sea Otters are 1.5 to 2 times faster than those observed in California and British Columbia, resulting in higher energy-intake rate estimates for Sea Otters in Washington. We investigated potential causes for the difference in handling time by: (1) comparing Sea Otter handling times of Kelp Crab and non-Kelp Crab prey items in Washington, California, and British Columbia; (2) comparing the handling times of Kelp Crabs by a subset of Sea Otters in California, which are Kelp Crab specialists (2003–2012, n = 244 Kelp Crab captures) to those of Sea Otters in Washington (2015–2018, n = 541 captures) and British Columbia (2013–2017, n = 359 captures); and (3) comparing the biomass-to-width ratios of Kelp Crabs from Washington and California. We did not observe consistent differences between regions in Sea Otter handling times of non-Kelp Crab prey. Mean Sea Otter handling time of small Kelp Crabs (carapace ≤1 Sea Otter paw width) in Washington (32.7 s) was significantly faster than in British Columbia (52.0 s, P < 0.0001) and all of California (40.6 s, P < 0.0001), but was not significantly different from that of Kelp Crab-specialist Sea Otters in California (31.7 s, P = 0.313). Mean Sea Otter handling time of large Kelp Crabs (≥1 Sea Otter paw) in Washington (64.7 s) was significantly faster than in British Columbia (87.7 s, P= 0.003), in all of California (104 s, P < 0.0001), and in the subset of Kelp Crab-specialist Sea Otters in California (91.6 s, P = 0.007). Kelp Crabs in Washington had a larger biomass-to-width ratio than Kelp Crabs in California: in Washington, a Kelp Crab with a 20-mm maximum carapace width had a 3.8% greater predicted biomass than a Kelp Crab in California of the same width, and a 27.1% greater biomass for a 60-mm carapace. Our results suggest that Sea Otters in Washington are Kelp Crab specialists with behavioral differences allowing them to consume Kelp Crabs faster, a difference that may affect the inference of Sea Otter population status from energy-intake rates in Washington.","PeriodicalId":142406,"journal":{"name":"Northwestern Naturalist","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RAPID CONSUMPTION OF KELP CRAB: IMPLICATIONS FOR SEA OTTERS IN WASHINGTON STATE\",\"authors\":\"Carter J Johnson, J. Hale, M. Tinker, Erin U Foster, J. Samhouri, A. Shelton, K. Laidre\",\"doi\":\"10.1898/NWN20-07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract As animal populations approach environmental carrying capacity, competition for food increases, generally leading to decreased individual energy intake rate. Energy-intake rate can therefore be used as one metric of population status relative to carrying capacity. Focal observations of Sea Otter (Enhydra lutris) foraging behavior have been used throughout their range to estimate energy-intake rates and infer population status. In Washington State, previous research has demonstrated that handling times for Kelp Crabs (Pugettia spp.) by Sea Otters are 1.5 to 2 times faster than those observed in California and British Columbia, resulting in higher energy-intake rate estimates for Sea Otters in Washington. We investigated potential causes for the difference in handling time by: (1) comparing Sea Otter handling times of Kelp Crab and non-Kelp Crab prey items in Washington, California, and British Columbia; (2) comparing the handling times of Kelp Crabs by a subset of Sea Otters in California, which are Kelp Crab specialists (2003–2012, n = 244 Kelp Crab captures) to those of Sea Otters in Washington (2015–2018, n = 541 captures) and British Columbia (2013–2017, n = 359 captures); and (3) comparing the biomass-to-width ratios of Kelp Crabs from Washington and California. We did not observe consistent differences between regions in Sea Otter handling times of non-Kelp Crab prey. Mean Sea Otter handling time of small Kelp Crabs (carapace ≤1 Sea Otter paw width) in Washington (32.7 s) was significantly faster than in British Columbia (52.0 s, P < 0.0001) and all of California (40.6 s, P < 0.0001), but was not significantly different from that of Kelp Crab-specialist Sea Otters in California (31.7 s, P = 0.313). Mean Sea Otter handling time of large Kelp Crabs (≥1 Sea Otter paw) in Washington (64.7 s) was significantly faster than in British Columbia (87.7 s, P= 0.003), in all of California (104 s, P < 0.0001), and in the subset of Kelp Crab-specialist Sea Otters in California (91.6 s, P = 0.007). Kelp Crabs in Washington had a larger biomass-to-width ratio than Kelp Crabs in California: in Washington, a Kelp Crab with a 20-mm maximum carapace width had a 3.8% greater predicted biomass than a Kelp Crab in California of the same width, and a 27.1% greater biomass for a 60-mm carapace. Our results suggest that Sea Otters in Washington are Kelp Crab specialists with behavioral differences allowing them to consume Kelp Crabs faster, a difference that may affect the inference of Sea Otter population status from energy-intake rates in Washington.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Northwestern Naturalist\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Northwestern Naturalist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1898/NWN20-07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northwestern Naturalist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1898/NWN20-07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当动物种群接近环境承载能力时,对食物的竞争加剧,通常导致个体能量摄取率下降。因此,能量摄取率可以作为相对于承载能力的人口状况的一个度量标准。通过对海獭(Enhydra lutris)觅食行为的局部观察,可以估计其能量摄取率并推断种群状况。在华盛顿州,先前的研究表明,海獭处理海带蟹(Pugettia spp.)的时间比在加利福尼亚州和不列颠哥伦比亚省观察到的要快1.5到2倍,这导致华盛顿海獭的能量摄取率估计更高。本研究通过对华盛顿州、加利福尼亚州和不列颠哥伦比亚省海獭对海带蟹和非海带蟹猎物的处理时间进行比较,探讨了海獭处理时间差异的潜在原因;(2)比较加利福尼亚州海獭(2003-2012年,n = 244只海獭捕获海带蟹)与华盛顿州海獭(2015-2018年,n = 541只)和不列颠哥伦比亚省海獭(2013-2017年,n = 359只)对海带蟹的处理次数;(3)比较华盛顿州和加利福尼亚州海带蟹的生物量与宽度比。我们没有观察到海獭处理非海带蟹猎物的时间在区域之间的一致性差异。华盛顿州小海带蟹(甲壳≤1海獭掌宽)的平均海獭处理时间(32.7 s)显著快于不列颠哥伦比亚省(52.0 s, P < 0.0001)和加利福尼亚州(40.6 s, P < 0.0001),但与加利福尼亚州海带蟹专业海獭(31.7 s, P = 0.313)差异不显著。华盛顿州海獭处理大型海獭蟹(≥1个海獭爪)的平均时间(64.7 s)显著快于不列颠哥伦比亚省(87.7 s, P= 0.003)、加利福尼亚州(104 s, P < 0.0001)和加利福尼亚州海獭专业海獭亚群(91.6 s, P= 0.007)。华盛顿的海带蟹比加州的海带蟹具有更大的生物量与宽度比:在华盛顿,最大壳宽为20毫米的海带蟹的预测生物量比相同宽度的加州海带蟹高3.8%,60毫米的海带蟹的生物量比加州海带蟹高27.1%。我们的研究结果表明,华盛顿的海獭是海带蟹专家,它们的行为差异使它们能够更快地消耗海带蟹,这一差异可能会影响华盛顿海獭种群状况的能量摄取率推断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
RAPID CONSUMPTION OF KELP CRAB: IMPLICATIONS FOR SEA OTTERS IN WASHINGTON STATE
Abstract As animal populations approach environmental carrying capacity, competition for food increases, generally leading to decreased individual energy intake rate. Energy-intake rate can therefore be used as one metric of population status relative to carrying capacity. Focal observations of Sea Otter (Enhydra lutris) foraging behavior have been used throughout their range to estimate energy-intake rates and infer population status. In Washington State, previous research has demonstrated that handling times for Kelp Crabs (Pugettia spp.) by Sea Otters are 1.5 to 2 times faster than those observed in California and British Columbia, resulting in higher energy-intake rate estimates for Sea Otters in Washington. We investigated potential causes for the difference in handling time by: (1) comparing Sea Otter handling times of Kelp Crab and non-Kelp Crab prey items in Washington, California, and British Columbia; (2) comparing the handling times of Kelp Crabs by a subset of Sea Otters in California, which are Kelp Crab specialists (2003–2012, n = 244 Kelp Crab captures) to those of Sea Otters in Washington (2015–2018, n = 541 captures) and British Columbia (2013–2017, n = 359 captures); and (3) comparing the biomass-to-width ratios of Kelp Crabs from Washington and California. We did not observe consistent differences between regions in Sea Otter handling times of non-Kelp Crab prey. Mean Sea Otter handling time of small Kelp Crabs (carapace ≤1 Sea Otter paw width) in Washington (32.7 s) was significantly faster than in British Columbia (52.0 s, P < 0.0001) and all of California (40.6 s, P < 0.0001), but was not significantly different from that of Kelp Crab-specialist Sea Otters in California (31.7 s, P = 0.313). Mean Sea Otter handling time of large Kelp Crabs (≥1 Sea Otter paw) in Washington (64.7 s) was significantly faster than in British Columbia (87.7 s, P= 0.003), in all of California (104 s, P < 0.0001), and in the subset of Kelp Crab-specialist Sea Otters in California (91.6 s, P = 0.007). Kelp Crabs in Washington had a larger biomass-to-width ratio than Kelp Crabs in California: in Washington, a Kelp Crab with a 20-mm maximum carapace width had a 3.8% greater predicted biomass than a Kelp Crab in California of the same width, and a 27.1% greater biomass for a 60-mm carapace. Our results suggest that Sea Otters in Washington are Kelp Crab specialists with behavioral differences allowing them to consume Kelp Crabs faster, a difference that may affect the inference of Sea Otter population status from energy-intake rates in Washington.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信